Cited by 176Bone Tissue Engineering Materials3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

Low-temperature additive manufacturing of biomimic three-dimensional hydroxyapatite/collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration

Lin, Kai-Feng, He, Shu, Song, Yue, Wang, Chun-Mei, Gao, Yi, Li, Jun-Qin, Tang, Peng, Wang, Zheng +2 more·2016·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Low-temperature additive manufacturing (AM) holds promise for fabrication of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds containing bioactive molecules and/or drugs. Due to the strict technical limitations of current approaches, few materials are suitable for printing at low temperature. Here, a low-temperature robocasting method was employed to print biomimic 3D scaffolds for bone regeneration using a routine collagen-hydroxyapatite (CHA) composite material, which is too viscous to be printed via normal 3D printing methods at low temperature. The CHA scaffolds had excellent 3D structure and maintained most raw material properties after printing. Compared to nonprinted scaffolds, printed scaffolds promoted bone marrow stromal cell proliferation and improved osteogenic outcome in vitro. In a rabbit femoral condyle defect model, the interconnecting pores within the printed scaffolds facilitated cell penetration and mineralization before the scaffolds degraded and enhanced repair, compared to nonprinted CHA scaffolds. Additionally, the optimal printing parameters for 3D CHA scaffolds were investigated; 600-μm-diameter rods were optimal in terms of moderate mechanical strength and better repair outcome in vivo. This low-temperature robocasting method could enable a variety of bioactive molecules to be incorporated into printed CHA materials and provides a method of bioprinting biomaterials without compromising their natural properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.6b00815

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, K.-F., He, S., Song, Y., Wang, C.-M., Gao, Y., Li, J.-Q., Tang, P., Wang, Z., Bi, L., & Pei, G.-X.
Affiliations
  • Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an, 710032, P. R. China
  • Xijing Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Bi, Long
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2016-03-09
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
6905-6916
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2289398738
Cited by
176
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 4
FWCI
8.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371982)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Keywords
direct ink writing, hydroxyapatite/collagen composite, 3D scaffolds, bone regeneration, biomimetic scaffolds, mesenchymal stem cells, osteogenic differentiation, femoral condyle defect, scaffold porosity, printing parameters
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Marrow Cells, Bone Regeneration, Cattle, Cells, Cultured, Collagen, Femur, Male, Rabbits, Stromal Cells, Durapatite, Bone Substitutes, Biomimetic Materials, Cell Proliferation, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review