Cited by 41Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Maintenance of Parent-Implemented Discrete-Trial Instruction during Videoconferencing

Subramaniam, Shrinidhi, Brunson, Lashanna Y., Cook, James E., Larson, Nicholas A., Poe, Susannah G., St. Peter, Claire C.·2017·Journal of Behavioral Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10864-016-9258-z

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subramaniam, S., Brunson, L. Y., Cook, J. E., Larson, N. A., Poe, S. G., & St. Peter, C. C.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Education
Published
2016-07-23
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
1-26
ISSN
  • 1053-0819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3513
OpenAlex
W2503781389
Cited by
41
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Behavioral Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Maternal and Child Health Bureau (R40 MC 20444)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
discrete trial instruction, parent-mediated intervention, videoconferencing, distant supervision, autism spectrum disorder, rural households

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review