Cited by 47Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Beyond descriptive research: advancing the study of spirituality and health

Open access
Rosmarin, David H., Wachholtz, Amy, Ai, Amy·2011·Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

The past three decades have witnessed a surge in research on spirituality and health. This growing body of literature has linked many aspects of spirituality as well as religion to both positive and negative indices of human functioning. However, studies have primarily been descriptive, focusing on identifying associations between spirituality and health, rather than explanatory, focusing on identifying mechanisms underlying observed relationships. Earlier research is also limited by failure to control for salient covariates, apply prospective design, and use sophisticated measurements with well defined and empirically-validated factors. Recent research, however, is advancing the study of spirituality and health by examining not only whether religious factors are relevant to human health, but also how spirituality may functionally impact medical and psychological wellbeing and illness. This article introduces a special issue on Spirituality and Health containing 12 full-length research reports to further this welcomed, emerging trend.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10865-011-9370-4

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although a number of conceptualizations of RS have been advanced, surprisingly few studies that use RS variables explicitly use these conceptualizations.

    “Although a number of conceptualizations of RS have been advanced, surprisingly few studies that use RS variables explicitly use these conceptualizations (Rosmarin et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosmarin, D. H., Wachholtz, A., & Ai, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Rosmarin, David H.
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2011-07-13
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
409-413
ISSN
  • 0160-7715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3521
OpenAlex
W2027433168
Cited by
47
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA030397)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
spirituality, health, psychological well-being, illness, explanatory research, covariate control, prospective study design
MeSH terms
Health Status, Humans, Mental Health, Research Design, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review