Cited by 14Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Janus faces of amyloid proteins in neuroinflammation

Open access
Steinman, Lawrence, Rothbard, Jonathan B., Kurnellas, Michael P.·2014·Journal of Clinical Immunology

Abstract

Amyloid forming molecules are generally considered harmful. In Alzheimer's Disease two amyloid molecules Aβ A4 and tau vie for consideration as the main pathogenic culprit. But molecules obey the laws of chemistry and defy the way we categorize them as humans with our well-known proclivities to bias in our reasoning. We have been exploring the brains of multiple sclerosis patients to identify molecules that are associated with protection from inflammation and degeneration. In 2001 we noted that aB crystallin (cryab) was the most abundant transcript found in MS lesions, but not in healthy brains. Cryab can reverse paralysis and attenuate inflammation in several models of inflammation including experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), and various models of ischemia. Cryab is an amyloid forming molecule. We have identified a core structure common to many amyloids including amyloid protein Aβ A4, tau, amylin, prion protein, serum amyloid protein P, and cryab. The core hexapeptide structure is highly immune suppressive and can reverse paralysis in EAE when administered systemically. Administration of this amyloid forming hexapeptide quickly lowers inflammatory cytokines in plasma like IL-6 and IL-2. The hexapeptide bind a set of proinflammatory mediators in plasma, including acute phase reactants and complement components. The beneficial properties of amyloid forming hexapeptides provide a potential new therapeutic direction. These experiments indicate that amyloid forming molecules have Janus faces, providing unexpected benefit for neuroinflammatory conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10875-014-0034-3

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aβ has a physiological role in innate immunity.

    “these studies highlight a physiological role for Aβ in innate immunity”

    From The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [143]

    The Abstract reports that Aβ-derived peptides reduce inflammatory markers in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and suggests that amyloid-forming proteins may contain inflammation in MS lesions. It does not establish a physiological role for Aβ in innate immunity; that extends the paper’s findings and its tentative account of a role in lesions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8]Grant JL Bou Ghosn EE Axtell RC Herges K Kuipers HF Woodling NS Unexpected therapeutic benefit from peripheral administration of amyloid-β in Th1- and Th17-versions of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Sci Transl Med 2012 4 145ra105 PMC3677069 22855462
  2. [14]Weinger JG Davies P Acker CM Brosnan CF Tsiperson V Bayewitz A J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2012 71 5 422 33 22487860 PMC3627392

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steinman, L., Rothbard, J. B., & Kurnellas, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Steinman, Lawrence
Venue
Journal of Clinical Immunology
Published
2014-04-08
Volume
34
Issue
S1
Pages
61-63
ISSN
  • 0271-9142 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2592
OpenAlex
W2045457048
Cited by
14
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Immunology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI007290)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
amyloid proteins, neuroinflammation, amyloid-beta, tau protein, alphaB-crystallin, multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, hexapeptide, immunosuppression, complement system, acute phase proteins, neuroprotection, Alzheimer's disease, amylin, prion protein, serum amyloid P component, inflammatory cytokines
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Interleukin-6, Neurogenic Inflammation, Mice, Amyloidogenic Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review