Cited by 43Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Disorganization and Individual Psychotherapy for Schizophrenia: A Case Report of Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy

Hamm, Jay A., Firmin, Ruth L.·2016·Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10879-016-9326-7

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamm, J. A., & Firmin, R. L.
Affiliations
  • Eskenazi Health (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Hamm, Jay A.
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
Published
2016-03-02
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
227-234
ISSN
  • 0022-0116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3564
OpenAlex
W2292324420
Cited by
43
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
schizophrenia, disorganization, formal thought disorder, Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy, merit, individual psychotherapy, disorganized speech, integrative psychotherapy, speech coherence, insight therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review