Cited by 9Innovations in Medical EducationPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEmpathy and Medical Education

Physician Communication Coaching: How Psychologists can Elevate Skills and Support Resident Education, Professionalism, and Well-being

Open access
Shamaskin-Garroway, Andrea, DeCaporale-Ryan, Lauren, Bell, Keisha, McDaniel, Susan·2022·Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

Abstract

Many factors influence resident physician communication, including rigorous training demands that can contribute to professionalism issues or burnout. The University of Rochester Physician Communication Coaching program launched for attendings in 2011, and expanded to residency programs within 11 clinical departments of our institution. In this model, psychologists serve as coaches, drawing on their expertise in communication skills, behavior change, and wellness promotion. These coaches conduct real-time observation of patient encounters, coding communication with an expanded Cambridge-Calgary Patient-Centered Observational Checklist. Residents receive a written report with individualized feedback. From 2013 to 2020, 279 residents were coached. Since 2018, residents have been formally surveyed for feedback (n = 70 surveys completed; 61% response rate), with 97% rating the experience Very Helpful or Helpful. Of the 70 completed surveys, 54 (77%) included qualitative feedback that has also been positive. Due to the feasibility and growing demand for communication coaching from other residency and fellowship programs, in 2018 two authors (SM and LD-R) developed a 2-year, part-time program to train communication coaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10880-021-09808-x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being outside of specialty is a factor in coach selection.

    “| Coach selection | Outside of specialty | [63,147,156] | |”

    From Coaching in undergraduate and graduate medical education: a scoping review of success factors, barriers, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Introduction (‘Psychologists as Communication Coaches’; page unavailable) says the program uses psychologists and psychology fellows as coaches in clinical residency programs, consistent with coaches working outside residents’ medical specialties. It lists training and professional experience as coach qualifications, but does not say that being outside a resident’s specialty is a factor in coach selection. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Institute of Medicine Crossing the quality chasm: A new health care system for the 21st century 2001 National Academy Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shamaskin-Garroway, A., DeCaporale-Ryan, L., Bell, K., & McDaniel, S.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Published
2021-08-07
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
608-615
ISSN
  • 1068-9583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3572
OpenAlex
W3187233783
Cited by
9
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
resident education, professionalism, burnout, patient-centered communication, personalized feedback, coach training programs, physician well-being
MeSH terms
Professionalism, Mentoring, Communication, Education, Medical, Graduate, Humans, Internship and Residency, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review