Cited by 561Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEmpathy and Medical EducationPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Communication skills training for physicians improves patient satisfaction

Open access
Boissy, Adrienne, Windover, Amy K., Bokar, Dan, Karafa, Matthew, Neuendorf, Katie, Frankel, Richard M., Merlino, James, Rothberg, Michael B.·2016·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Skilled physician communication is a key component of patient experience. Large-scale studies of exposure to communication skills training and its impact on patient satisfaction have not been conducted.Objective We aimed to examine the impact of experiential relationship-centered physician communication skills training on patient satisfaction and physician experience.Design This was an observational study.Setting The study was conducted at a large, multispecialty academic medical center.Participants Participants included 1537 attending physicians who participated in, and 1951 physicians who did not participate in, communication skills training between 1 August 2013 and 30 April 2014.Intervention An 8-h block of interactive didactics, live or video skill demonstrations, and small group and large group skills practice sessions using a relationship-centered model.Main measures Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CGCAHPS), Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), self-efficacy, and post course satisfaction.Key results Following the course, adjusted overall CGCAHPS scores for physician communication were higher for intervention physicians than for controls (92.09 vs. 91.09, p < 0.03). No significant interactions were noted between physician specialty or baseline CGCAHPS and improvement following the course. Significant improvement in the post-course HCAHPS Respect domain adjusted mean was seen in intervention versus control groups (91.08 vs. 88.79, p = 0.02) and smaller, non-statistically significant improvements were also seen for adjusted HCAHPS communication scores (83.95 vs. 82.73, p = 0.22). Physicians reported high course satisfaction and showed significant improvement in empathy (116.4 ± 12.7 vs. 124 ± 11.9, p < 0.001) and burnout, including all measures of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Less depersonalization and greater personal accomplishment were sustained for at least 3 months.Conclusions System-wide relationship-centered communication skills training improved patient satisfaction scores, improved physician empathy, self-efficacy, and reduced physician burnout. Further research is necessary to examine longer-term sustainability of such interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-016-3597-2

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has shown that communication workshops with simulations, role-plays, interactive practices, discussions, feedbacks, or self-debrief may be more useful in improving skills and reducing burnout than traditional lecture-based teaching.

    “Research has shown that communication workshops with simulations of real-life clinical situations through role-plays, interactive practices, discussions, feedbacks, or self-debrief may be more useful in improving skills [5,22] and reducing burnout in HCP than traditional lecture-based teaching [2,14].”

    From The efficacy of applying the Interpersonal Effectiveness skills of dialectical behavior therapy into communication skills workshop for clinical nurses (2023) · cites this paper as [5]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boissy, A., Windover, A. K., Bokar, D., Karafa, M., Neuendorf, K., Frankel, R. M., Merlino, J., & Rothberg, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Press Ganey (US)
Corresponding author
Boissy, Adrienne
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2016-02-26
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
755-761
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2280048680
Cited by
561
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 10
FWCI
82.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
patient satisfaction, relationship-centered care, empathy, physician burnout, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, self-efficacy, HCAHPS, physician-patient communication
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Burnout, Professional, Communication, Empathy, Female, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Case-Control Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review