Cited by 17Infant Development and Preterm CareDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The relationship between perinatal risk factors and sensory processing difficulties in preschool children

Franci Crepeau-Hobson, M.·2009·Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10882-009-9144-x

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Franci Crepeau-Hobson, M.
Venue
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities
Published
2009-06-24
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
315-328
ISSN
  • 1056-263X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3580
OpenAlex
W2011774442
Cited by
17
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
perinatal risk factors, sensory processing difficulties, preschool children, Short Sensory Profile, pregnancy complications, childbirth complications, maternal health, developmental disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review