The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results
Open accessAbstract
The 2014 release of a new set of purchasing power parity conversion factors (PPPs) for 2011 has prompted a revision of the international poverty line. In order to preserve the integrity of the goalposts for international targets such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the World Bank's twin goals, the new poverty line was chosen so as to preserve the definition and real purchasing power of the earlier $1.25 line (in 2005 PPPs) in poor countries. Using the new 2011 PPPs, the new line equals $1.90 per person per day. The higher value of the line in US dollars reflects the fact that the new PPPs yield a relatively lower purchasing power of that currency vis-à-vis those of most poor countries. Because the line was designed to preserve real purchasing power in poor countries, the revisions lead to relatively small changes in global poverty incidence: from 14.5 percent in the old method to 14.1 percent in the new method for 2011.In 2012, the new reference year for the global count, we find 12.7 percent of the world's population, or 897 million people, are living in extreme poverty. There are changes in the regional composition of poverty, but they are also relatively small. This paper documents the detailed methodological decisions taken in the process of updating both the poverty line and the consumption and income distributions at the country level, including issues of inter-temporal and spatial price adjustments. It also describes various caveats, limitations, perils and pitfalls of the approach taken.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buhmann, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G., & Smeeding, T. M. (1988) · Review of Income and Wealth · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4991.1988.tb00564.x · Cited by 1,200
The Developing World is Poorer than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight Against Poverty
Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2010) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1577 · Cited by 1,062
Self-citationOn a Class of Poverty Measures
Kakwani, N. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911106 · Cited by 759
Lanjouw, P., & Ravallion, M. (1995) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2235108 · Cited by 666
World development report 1990 : poverty
Ribe, H. C., Ahmad, E., van der Gaag, J., Ayres, R. L., Fields, G. S., Squire, L., Suridberg, M., Walton, M. F., & van de Walle, D. (1990) · Cited by 644
Introduction to Survey Quality
Biemer, P. P., & Lyberg, L. E. (2003) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471458740 · Cited by 615
When is growth pro-poor? Evidence from a panel of countries
Kraay, A. (2006) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.004 · Cited by 605
How Have the World's Poorest Fared since the Early 1980s?
Chen, S. (2004) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/lkh020 · Cited by 574
Self-citationIntroduction to Survey Quality
(2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s786 · Cited by 541
THE BANGLADESH DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Osmani, S. R., Sen, B., & FINDLAY, C. C. (2009) · Cited by 516
Cited by
Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: a global analysis
Hirvonen, K., Bai, Y., Headey, D., & Masters, W. A. (2020) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30447-4 · Cited by 675
Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study
Wagstaff, A., Flores, G., Smitz, M.-F., Hsu, J., Chepynoga, K., & Eozenou, P. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30486-2 · Cited by 421
Zhao, Y., Oldenburg, B., Mahal, A., Lin, Y., Tang, S., & Liu, X. (2020) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.13344 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferreira, F. H. G., Chen, S., Dabalen, A., Dikhanov, Y., Hamadeh, N., Jolliffe, D., Narayan, A., Prydz, E. B., Revenga, A., Sangraula, P., Serajuddin, U., & Yoshida, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Economic Inequality
- Published
- 2016-04-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 141-172
- ISSN
- 1569-1721 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8701
- OpenAlex
- W1878837303
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 109.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10888-016-9326-6
- The paper
- Ferreira, F. H. G., Chen, S., Dabalen, A., Dikhanov, Y., Hamadeh, N., Jolliffe, D., Narayan, A., Prydz, E. B., Revenga, A., Sangraula, P., Serajuddin, U., & Yoshida, N. (2016). A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results. The Journal of Economic Inequality. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-016-9326-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.