Cited by 209Intimate Partner and Family ViolencePsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCrime Patterns and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“I didn't do it, but if I did I had a good reason”: minimization, denial, and attributions of blame among male and female domestic violence offenders

Henning, Kris, Jones, Angela R., Holdford, Robert·2005·Journal of Family Violence

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-005-3647-8

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Crowne, D., and Marlowe, D. (1964). The Approval Motive: Studies in Adaptive Dependence, Wiley, New York.
  2. Greenfeld, L., Rand, M., Craven, D., Klaus, P., Perkins, C., Ringel, C., Warchol, G., Matson, C., and Fox, J. A. (1998). Violence by Intimates: Analysis of Data on Crimes by Current or Former Spouses, Boyfriends and Girlfriends (NCJ 167237), US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
  3. Hamberger, K., and Arnold, J. (1990). The impact of mandatory arrest on domestic violence perpetrator counseling services. Fam. Violence Bull. 6: 11–12.
  4. Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. W., and Eaves, D. (1995). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide, 2nd edn., Institute on Family Violence, Vancouver, Canada, British Columbia.
  5. Miller, F. G., and Lazowski, L. E. (1999). The SASSI manual, 2nd edn., The SASSI Institute, Springville, IN.
  6. tate of California (1999). Report on arrest for domestic violence in California, 1998 (Office of the Attorney General). Crim. Just. Stat. Cent. Rep. Ser. 1(3): 1–20.
  7. Swan, S. (2000). Women Who Fight Back: Women’s Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships, or: In Search of the Female Batterer. In Paper presented at the Family Violence and Sexual Assault Institute, San Diego, CA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Henning, K., Jones, A. R., & Holdford, R.
Affiliations
  • Portland State University (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Henning, Kris
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2005-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
131-139
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W2049150655
Cited by
209
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
intimate partner violence, perpetrators of domestic violence, women offenders, blame attribution, denial, social desirability bias, gender differences, recidivism, treatment non-adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review