Cited by 546Attachment and Relationship DynamicsIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Intimacy‐Anger and Insecure Attachment as Precursors of Abuse in Intimate Relationships1

Dutton, Donald G., Saunders, Keith, Starzomski, Andrew, Bartholomew, Kim·1994·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

One hundred and twenty men referred for treatment for wife assault and forty demographic controls completed self‐report questionnaires assessing attachment patterns, anger, jealousy, Borderline Personality Organization, and trauma symptoms. This constellation, with the exception of attachment, has been found to represent a profile related significantly to the frequency of both verbal and physical abuse. In the present study, attachment was found to correlate significantly with these other measures. A measure of secure attachment correlated significantly, but negatively, with the constellation measures. A measure of fearful attachment correlated significantly and positively. A preoccupied attachment pattern correlated with the other measures less strongly than did the fearful measure. A dismissing measure was not correlated with any constellation measures. The role of attachment anger is discussed; it is suggested that fearful attachment could also be described as angry attachment. The concept of intimacy anger is introduced from early studies in attachment and applied to the explanation of assaultiveness in adult relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01554.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four studies that compared clinical groups of IPV perpetrators with control groups of non-perpetrators showed that attachment anxiety or fearful attachment make the difference between the two groups, and that IPV has a negative correlation (r = −0.30) with the attachment dimension of closeness.

    “Four studies that confronted clinical groups of IPV perpetrators with control groups of non-perpetrators showed that attachment anxiety or fearful attachment make the difference between the two groups (Dutton et al., 1994, 1996; Dutton, 1995) and that IPV has a negative correlation (r = −0.30) with the attachment dimension of closeness (Lawson, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dutton, D. G., Saunders, K., Starzomski, A., & Bartholomew, K.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Dutton, Donald G.
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-08
Volume
24
Issue
15
Pages
1367-1386
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2062640807
Cited by
546
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 34
FWCI
18.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
intimate partner violence, wife assault, insecure attachment, fearful attachment, preoccupied attachment, dismissing attachment, anger, jealousy, borderline personality organization, trauma symptoms, intimate relationships, secure attachment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review