Cited by 96Child Abuse and TraumaAttachment and Relationship DynamicsIntimate Partner and Family Violence

The Relationship Between Childhood Physical Abuse and Adult Attachment Styles

Unger, Jo Ann M., De Luca, Rayleen V.·2014·Journal of Family Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10896-014-9588-3

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unger, J. A. M., & De Luca, R. V.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Corresponding author
Unger, Jo Ann M.
Venue
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2014-03-23
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
223-234
ISSN
  • 0885-7482 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2851
OpenAlex
W2132546172
Cited by
95
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Violence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
child physical abuse, adult attachment styles, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, insecure attachment, social support, intimate relationships, protective factors, history of child abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review