Cited by 58Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeuroscience and Music PerceptionDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

A Comparison of Ambient Casino Sound and Music: Effects on Dissociation and on Perceptions of Elapsed Time While Playing Slot Machines

Noseworthy, Theodore J., Finlay, Karen·2009·Journal of Gambling Studies

Abstract

This research examined the effects of a casino's auditory character on estimates of elapsed time while gambling. More specifically, this study varied whether the sound heard while gambling was ambient casino sound alone or ambient casino sound accompanied by music. The tempo and volume of both the music and ambient sound were varied to manipulate temporal engagement and introspection. One hundred and sixty (males = 91) individuals played slot machines in groups of 5-8, after which they provided estimates of elapsed time. The findings showed that the typical ambient casino auditive environment, which characterizes the majority of gaming venues, promotes understated estimates of elapsed duration of play. In contrast, when music is introduced into the ambient casino environment, it appears to provide a cue of interval from which players can more accurately reconstruct elapsed duration of play. This is particularly the case when the tempo of the music is slow and the volume is high. Moreover, the confidence with which time estimates are held (as reflected by latency of response) is higher in an auditive environment with music than in an environment that is comprised of ambient casino sounds alone. Implications for casino management are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10899-009-9136-x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noseworthy, T. J., & Finlay, K.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Noseworthy, Theodore J.
Venue
Journal of Gambling Studies
Published
2009-07-07
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
331-342
ISSN
  • 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3602
OpenAlex
W2052386729
Cited by
57
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
slot machines, gambling, time perception, dissociation, music tempo, music volume, self-reflection, response latency, casino management
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aged, Cues, Female, Gambling, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Music, Ontario, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Environment, Time Perception, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review