Cited by 305Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkplace Health and Well-being

What is psychological well-being, really? a grassroots approach from the organizational sciences.

Dagenais-Desmarais, Véronique, Savoie, André·2012·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-011-9285-3

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A.
Affiliations
Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2011-07-16
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
659-684
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W2073985365
Cited by
305
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Université de Sherbrooke
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
employee well-being, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, thriving at work, perceived competence, perceived recognition, psychological distress, positive and negative affect, life satisfaction, instrument development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review