The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Epidemiology of Mastitis Pathogens of Dairy Cattle and Comparative Relevance to Humans
Open accessAbstract
Mastitis, inflammation of the mammary gland, can be caused by a wide range of organisms, including gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, mycoplasmas and algae. Many microbial species that are common causes of bovine mastitis, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus aureus also occur as commensals or pathogens of humans whereas other causative species, such as Streptococcus uberis, Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. dysgalactiae or Staphylococcus chromogenes, are almost exclusively found in animals. A wide range of molecular typing methods have been used in the past two decades to investigate the epidemiology of bovine mastitis at the subspecies level. These include comparative typing methods that are based on electrophoretic banding patterns, library typing methods that are based on the sequence of selected genes, virulence gene arrays and whole genome sequencing projects. The strain distribution of mastitis pathogens has been investigated within individual animals and across animals, herds, countries and host species, with consideration of the mammary gland, other animal or human body sites, and environmental sources. Molecular epidemiological studies have contributed considerably to our understanding of sources, transmission routes, and prognosis for many bovine mastitis pathogens and to our understanding of mechanisms of host-adaptation and disease causation. In this review, we summarize knowledge gleaned from two decades of molecular epidemiological studies of mastitis pathogens in dairy cattle and discuss aspects of comparative relevance to human medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moazzez, A. (2007) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.9.881 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Advances in therapeutic and managemental approaches of bovine mastitis: a comprehensive review
Sharun, K., Dhama, K., Tiwari, R., Gugjoo, M. B., Iqbal Yatoo, M., Patel, S. K., Pathak, M., Karthik, K., Khurana, S. K., Singh, R., et al. (2021) · Veterinary Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01652176.2021.1882713 · Cited by 359
Cook, R., Hooton, S., Trivedi, U., King, L., Dodd, C. E. R., Hobman, J. L., Stekel, D. J., Jones, M. A., & Millard, A. D. (2021) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-021-01010-3 · Cited by 319
Epidemiology and Classification of Mastitis
Cobirka, M., Tancin, V., & Slama, P. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122212 · Cited by 309
An update on environmental mastitis: Challenging perceptions
Klaas, I. C., & Zadoks, R. N. (2018) · Transboundary and Emerging Diseases · doi:10.1111/tbed.12704 · Cited by 287
Self-citationCamargo, A. C., Costa, E. A., Fusieger, A., Freitas, R. D., Nero, L. A., & Carvalho, A. F. D. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109803 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Zadoks, R. N., Middleton, J. R., McDougall, S., Katholm, J., & Schukken, Y. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia
- Published
- 2011-10-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-372
- ISSN
- 1083-3021 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7039
- OpenAlex
- W1986791998
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Epidemiology of Mastitis Pathogens of Dairy Cattle and Comparative Relevance to Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10911-011-9236-y
- The paper
- Zadoks, R. N., Middleton, J. R., McDougall, S., Katholm, J., & Schukken, Y. H. (2011). Molecular Epidemiology of Mastitis Pathogens of Dairy Cattle and Comparative Relevance to Humans. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10911-011-9236-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.