The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An update on environmental mastitis: Challenging perceptions
Open accessAbstract
Environmental mastitis is the most common and costly form of mastitis in modern dairy herds where contagious transmission of intramammary pathogens is controlled through implementation of standard mastitis prevention programmes. Environmental mastitis can be caused by a wide range of bacterial species, and binary classification of species as contagious or environmental is misleading, particularly for Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus uberis and other streptococcal species, including Streptococcus agalactiae. Bovine faeces, the indoor environment and used pasture are major sources of mastitis pathogens, including Escherichia coli and S. uberis. A faeco-oral transmission cycle may perpetuate and amplify the presence of such pathogens, including Klebsiella pneumoniae and S. agalactiae. Because of societal pressure to reduce reliance on antimicrobials as tools for mastitis control, management of environmental mastitis will increasingly need to be based on prevention. This requires a reduction in environmental exposure through bedding, pasture and pre-milking management and enhancement of the host response to bacterial challenge. Efficacious vaccines are available to reduce the impact of coliform mastitis, but vaccine development for gram-positive mastitis has not progressed beyond the "promising" stage for decades. Improved diagnostic tools to identify causative agents and transmission patterns may contribute to targeted use of antimicrobials and intervention measures. The most important tool for improved uptake of known mastitis prevention measures is communication. Development of better technical or biological tools for management of environmental mastitis must be accompanied by development of appropriate incentives and communication strategies for farmers and veterinarians, who may be confronted with government-mandated antimicrobial use targets if voluntary reduction is not implemented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2016) · Cited by 2,888
Holt, K. E., Wertheim, H., Zadoks, R. N., Baker, S., Whitehouse, C. A., Dance, D., Jenney, A., Connor, T. R., Hsu, L. Y., Severin, J., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1501049112 · Cited by 1,236
Self-citationThe World Health Organization Global Action Plan for antimicrobial resistance
Mendelson, M., & Matsoso, M. P. (2015) · South African Medical Journal · doi:10.7196/samj.9644 · Cited by 1,155
Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds
Seegers, H. H., Fourichon, C., & Beaudeau, F. (2003) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003027 · Cited by 1,014
Severity of E. coli mastitis is mainly determined by cow factors
Burvenich, C., Van Merris, V., Mehrzad, J., Diez-Fraile, A., & Duchateau, L. (2003) · Veterinary Research · doi:10.1051/vetres:2003023 · Cited by 596
Invited review: Changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare
Barkema, H. W., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Kastelic, J. P., Lam, T. J. G. M., Luby, C., Roy, J.-P., LeBlanc, S. J., Keefe, G. P., & Kelton, D. F. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9377 · Cited by 595
Mastitis detection: current trends and future perspectives
Viguier, C., Arora, S., Gilmartin, N., Welbeck, K., & O’Kennedy, R. (2009) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.05.004 · Cited by 520
Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Lam, T. J. G. M., Beiboer, M. L., Wilmink, H., Benedictus, G., & Brand, A. (1998) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75591-2 · Cited by 486
Environmental Mastitis: Cause, Prevalence, Prevention
Smith, K. L., Todhunter, D. A., & Schoenberger, P. S. (1985) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(85)80993-0 · Cited by 475
Molecular Epidemiology of Mastitis Pathogens of Dairy Cattle and Comparative Relevance to Humans
Zadoks, R. N., Middleton, J. R., McDougall, S., Katholm, J., & Schukken, Y. H. (2011) · Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia · doi:10.1007/s10911-011-9236-y · Cited by 438
Self-citation
Cited by
Advances in therapeutic and managemental approaches of bovine mastitis: a comprehensive review
Sharun, K., Dhama, K., Tiwari, R., Gugjoo, M. B., Iqbal Yatoo, M., Patel, S. K., Pathak, M., Karthik, K., Khurana, S. K., Singh, R., et al. (2021) · Veterinary Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01652176.2021.1882713 · Cited by 359
Epidemiology and Classification of Mastitis
Cobirka, M., Tancin, V., & Slama, P. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10122212 · Cited by 309
miR-223: An Effective Regulator of Immune Cell Differentiation and Inflammation
Jiao, P., Wang, X.-P., Luoreng, Z.-M., Yang, J., Jia, L., Ma, Y., & Wei, D.-W. (2021) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.59876 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Klaas, I. C., & Zadoks, R. N.
- Venue
- Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-10-30
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 166-185
- ISSN
- 1865-1674 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766811201
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 23.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An update on environmental mastitis: Challenging perceptions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/tbed.12704
- The paper
- Klaas, I. C., & Zadoks, R. N. (2018). An update on environmental mastitis: Challenging perceptions. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.