Cited by 12Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationDisability Education and Employment

Enabling work: occupational therapy interventions for persons with occupational injuries and diseases: a scoping review

Blas, Alexa Jane T., Beltran, Kenneth Matthew B., Martinez, Pauline Gail V., Yao, Daryl Patrick G.·2018·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Purpose This review aims to map the scope of published research on occupational therapy (OT) interventions and pertinent work and work-related outcomes for persons with occupational injuries and diseases. Methods The scoping review adapted Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Six electronic databases were searched. Ancestral search was also done on five systematic reviews. The search was conducted from September 2015 to October 2015. Interventions and outcomes were coded using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation to plot trends. Results Forty-six articles were included in the review. The top five intervention approaches included: acquiring skills (12.27%), health services, systems, and policies (10.43%), products and technology for employment (9.20%), handling stress and other psychological demands (7.98%), and apprenticeship (6.74%). The top five outcomes targeted included: remunerative employment (15.71%); sensation of pain (10.99%); emotional functions (5.76%); handling stress and other psychological demands (5.76%); economic self-sufficiency (4.71%); muscle endurance functions (4.71%); exercise tolerance functions (4.71%); undertaking multiple tasks (4.19%); acquiring, keeping, and terminating a job (4.19%); and looking after one's health (4.19%). Conclusion The trend in interventions show the use of activities and environment facilitators which are attuned to the conceptual nature of OT. Furthermore, the trend in outcomes show that there is substantial evidence that supports the use of OT to target work. This review may provide a platform for collaboration with other professionals and also help identify research directions to strengthen the evidence base for OT in work-related practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10926-017-9732-z

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blas, A. J. T., Beltran, K. M. B., Martinez, P. G. V., & Yao, D. P. G.
Affiliations
University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Corresponding author
  • Blas, Alexa Jane T.
  • Yao, Daryl Patrick G.
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2017-09-08
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
201-214
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W2754776748
Cited by
12
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
occupational therapy intervention, occupational injuries, occupational diseases, return to work, vocational rehabilitation, work-related outcomes, pain, stress management, apprenticeship, skill acquisition, assistive technology, economic self-reliance
MeSH terms
Humans, Occupational Diseases, Occupational Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Occupational Injuries, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review