Cited by 52Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMedical Practices and RehabilitationStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Intelligent Robotics Incorporating Machine Learning Algorithms for Improving Functional Capacity Evaluation and Occupational Rehabilitation

Fong, Jason, Ocampo, Renz, Gross, Douglas P., Tavakoli, Mahdi·2020·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

Introduction Occupational rehabilitation often involves functional capacity evaluations (FCE) that use simulated work tasks to assess work ability. Currently, there exists no single, streamlined solution to simulate all or a large number of standard work tasks. Such a system would improve FCE and functional rehabilitation through simulating reaching maneuvers and more dexterous functional tasks that are typical of workplace activities. This paper reviews efforts to develop robotic FCE solutions that incorporate machine learning algorithms. Methods We reviewed the literature regarding rehabilitation robotics, with an emphasis on novel techniques incorporating robotics and machine learning into FCE. Results Rehabilitation robotics aims to improve the assessment and rehabilitation of injured workers by providing methods for easily simulating workplace tasks using intelligent robotic systems. Machine learning-based approaches combine the benefits of robotic systems with the expertise and experience of human therapists. These innovations have the potential to improve the quantification of function as well as learn the haptic interactions provided by therapists to assist patients during assessment and rehabilitation. This is done by allowing a robot to learn based on a therapist's motions ("demonstrations") what the desired workplace activity ("task") is and how to recreate it for a worker with an injury ("patient"). Through Telerehabilitation and internet connectivity, these robot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10926-020-09888-w

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Robotics with integrated machine learning algorithms can improve the assessment of functional abilities in functional capacity evaluations.

    “Although this type of research is still in its infancy, robotics with integrated machine learning algorithms can improve the assessment of functional abilities [67].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fong, J., Ocampo, R., Gross, D. P., & Tavakoli, M.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Gross, Douglas P.
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2020-04-06
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
362-370
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W3014246233
Cited by
52
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
rehabilitation robotics, functional capacity assessment, vocational rehabilitation, machine learning, reaching task, task simulation, injured workers, telerehabilitation, haptic interaction, imitation learning
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Humans, Rehabilitation, Robotics, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review