Cited by 29Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSchool Health and Nursing EducationBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Measuring Quality of Delivery in a Substance Use Prevention Program

Giles, Steven, Jackson-Newsom, Julia, Pankratz, Melinda M., Hansen, William B., Ringwalt, Christopher L., Dusenbury, Linda·2008·The Journal of Primary Prevention

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an observation measure designed to capture teachers' use of interactive teaching skills within the delivery of the All Stars substance use prevention program. Coders counted the number of times teachers praised and encouraged students, accepted and used students' ideas, asked questions, self-disclosed personal anecdotes, and corrected student misbehavior. These teacher behaviors loaded on three factors: classroom management, acknowledgment, and student-centered methods. Classroom management was negatively related to student engagement. Acknowledgment was negatively related to students' normative beliefs. Student-centered methods were positively related to student idealism and normative beliefs, and marginally predicted decreases in student marijuana use. Editors' Strategic Implications: The authors provide a promising approach to studying pedagogical prevention approaches, and they also link teaching processes to student outcomes. This study of program delivery should be of general interest (i.e., not limited to substance use prevention) to practitioners and researchers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10935-008-0155-7

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A coding system and manual were created for the four target lessons, with codes for dosage and adherence.

    “We have developed a coding system and manual similar to the work of others (Forgatch et al. 2005; Giles et al. 2008; Knutson et al. 2003). Specific codes have been developed for each of the four lessons with regard to dosage and adherence.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giles, S., Jackson-Newsom, J., Pankratz, M. M., Hansen, W. B., Ringwalt, C. L., & Dusenbury, L.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University (US)
  • Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation (US)
  • Tanglewood Research (US)
Corresponding author
Giles, Steven
Venue
The Journal of Primary Prevention
Published
2008-11
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
489-501
ISSN
  • 0278-095X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6547
OpenAlex
W2087068814
Cited by
29
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA016098)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
substance use prevention, teacher behavior, classroom management, student-centered learning, student engagement, normative beliefs, cannabis use, prevention education, observational coding
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Chicago, Child, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Quality of Health Care, School Health Services, Teaching, Program Evaluation, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review