Cited by 19Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion, Society, and DevelopmentHealth, psychology, and well-being

The Coping Mechanisms and Strategies of Hypertension Patients in Ghana: The Role of Religious Faith, Beliefs and Practices

Anyan, Frederick, Knizek, Birthe Loa·2018·Journal of Religion and Health

Abstract

This qualitative study explored the role of religious faith, belief and practice systems in the coping mechanisms and strategies of essential hypertension patients in Accra, Ghana. Six participants were recruited for participation, of which five were Christians and one was a Muslim. Interviews were conducted and interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to analyze the data. Results showed that participants used their religious faith, beliefs and practices as coping resources. Participants used a deferring-collaborative style of religious coping, which seemed to have provided them with an avoidance strategy that protected the participants from conscious confrontation with their illness. Religious faith and beliefs also afforded the participants a sense of coherence that enabled the participants to manage their stress, reflect on their external and internal resources to promote effective coping and adaptive functioning in a health promoting manner. Implications of a deferring-collaborative style of religious coping and religious re-appraisal are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10943-017-0517-7

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anyan, F., & Knizek, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag (NO)
Corresponding author
Anyan, Frederick
Venue
Journal of Religion and Health
Published
2017-11-06
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1402-1412
ISSN
  • 0022-4197 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6571
OpenAlex
W2767334926
Cited by
19
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Religion and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Psychology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion, Society, and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
essential hypertension, religious coping, coping strategies, faith, religious beliefs and practices, sense of coherence, stress management, Christian patients, Muslim patients, Ghana
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Christianity, Female, Ghana, Humans, Hypertension, Interviews as Topic, Islam, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Religion and Medicine, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review