Cited by 8,189Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsPhenomenology and Existential Philosophy

Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research

James Briggs·2010·QMiP Bulletin

Abstract

Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) is an increasingly popular approach to qualitative inquiry. This handy text covers its theoretical foundations and provides a detailed guide to conducting IPA research. Extended worked examples from the authors' own studies in health, sexuality, psychological distress and identity illustrate the breadth and depth of IPA research. Each of the chapters also offers a guide to other good exemplars of IPA research in the designated area. The final section of the book considers how IPA connects with other contemporary qualitative approaches like discourse and narrative analysis and how it addresses issues to do with validity. The book is written in an accessible style and will be extremely useful to students and researchers in psychology and related disciplines in the health and social sciences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpsqmip.2010.1.10.44

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briggs, J.
Corresponding author
James Briggs
Venue
QMiP Bulletin
Published
2010-10
Volume
1
Issue
10
Pages
44-46
ISSN
  • 2044-0820 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-9598
OpenAlex
W1607118314
Cited by
8,189
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 478 · 2024: 635 · 2023: 645 · 2022: 593 · 2021: 731 · 2020: 654 · 2019: 671 · 2018: 618 · 2017: 590 · 2016: 526 · 2015: 610 · 2014: 530 · 2013: 371 · 2012: 276
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
QMiP Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Keywords
interpretative phenomenological analysis, qualitative research methodology, phenomenology, sexuality, psychological distress, identity, discourse analysis, narrative analysis, research validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review