Cited by 358University-Industry-Government Innovation ModelsHuman Resources and WorkforceRegional Development and Innovation

Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems

Open access
Gunasekara, Chrys·2006·The Journal of Technology Transfer

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10961-005-5016-4

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HEIs play a crucial role in technology innovation and its diffusion through creating knowledge, providing talent, and translating research into innovations.

    “Higher education institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in technology innovation and its diffusion through creating knowledge, providing talent, and translating research into innovations [7].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Braczyk, H, Cooke, P & Heidenreich, M (eds) 1998, Regional Innovation Systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, UCL Press, London.
  2. Camagni, R (ed.) 1991, Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, Belhaven, London.
  3. Castells, M & Hall, P 1994, Technopolis of the World -The Making of Twenty-First Century Industrial Complexes, Routledge, London.
  4. Edquist, C (ed.) 1997a, Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, London.
  5. ----1997b, 'Systems of innovation approaches -their emergence and characteristics', in C Edquist (ed.), Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, Pinter, London and Washington DC.
  6. Etzkowitz, H & Leydesdorff, L 1997, 'Introduction: Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy', in H Etzkowitz & L Leydesdorff (eds), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London and Washington, pp. 1-8.
  7. Freeman, C 1995, 'The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective', Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 19, pp. 5-24.
  8. Goddard, J 1999, 'Universities and Regional Development: An Overview', in Z Klich (ed.), Universities and Regional Engagement, Southern Cross University Press, Lismore, pp. 33-46.
  9. Guston, DH 2000, 'Retiring the social contract for science', Issues in Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 32-6.
  10. Hart, DM 1988, Forged Consensus: Science, Technology and Economic Policy in the United States, 1921-1953, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  11. Hassink, R 2001, 'Towards regionally embedded innovation support systems in South Korea? Case studies from Kyongbuk-Taegu and Kyonggi', Urban Studies, vol. 38, pp. 1373-95.
  12. Holland, BA 1999, 'From Murky to Meaningful: The Role of Mission in Institutional Change', in RG Bringle, R Games & EA Malloy (eds), Colleges and Universities as Citizens, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 48-73.
  13. ----2001, 'Toward a definition and characterization of the engaged university', Metropolitan Universities, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 20-9.
  14. Krugman, P 1997, 'Good news from Ireland:A geographical perspective', in A Gray (ed.), International Perspectives on the Irish Economy, Indecon, Dublin.
  15. Lawton Smith, H, Keeble, D, Lawson, C, Moore, B & Wilkinson, F 1998, 'Contrasting Regional Innovation Systems in Oxford and Cambridge', in J De La Mothe & G Pacquet (eds), Local and Regional systems of Innovation, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht/London.
  16. Lawson, C 1997, Territorial clustering and high technology innovation:from industrial districts to innovative milieux, Working Paper 54, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  17. Lundvall, B 1992, 'Introduction', in B Lundvall (ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London.
  18. Morgan, K & Nauwelaers, C 1999, 'A Regional Perspective on Innovation:From Theory to Strategy', in K Morgan & C Nauwelaers (eds), Regional Innovation Strategies:The Challenge for Less-Favoured Regions, The Stationery Office, London, pp. 1-18. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) 1997, National Systems of Innovation, OECD, Paris.
  19. Putnam, R 1993, 'The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life', American Prospect, vol. 13, pp. 35-42.
  20. ----1994, Regional advantage:Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,MA.
  21. Smith, BLR 1990, American Science Policy Since World War II, The Brookings Intitution, Washington, D.C. Sternberg, R 2000a, 'University-Industry Relationships in Germany and Their Regional Consequences', in Z Acs (ed.), Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change, Pinter, London and New York, pp. 89-122.
  22. Sutz, J 1997, 'The New Role of theUniversity in the Productive Sector', in H Etzkowitz & L Leydesdorff (eds), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London and Washington, pp. 11-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunasekara, C.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Gunasekara, Chrys
Venue
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2005-11-30
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
101-113
ISSN
  • 0892-9912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7047
OpenAlex
W1559493171
Cited by
358
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 21
FWCI
21.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Technology Transfer (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • QUT Business School
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Human Resources and Workforce
  • Social Sciences › Development › Regional Development and Innovation
Keywords
role of universities, regional innovation systems, triple helix model, university-industry-government relations, university engagement, regional innovation, conceptual framework, Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review