Cited by 162Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesInnovation and Knowledge ManagementPrivate Equity and Venture Capital

How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: a systematic review against the background of management theories

Open access
Eveleens, Chris P., van Rijnsoever, Frank J., Niesten, Eva M. M. I.·2017·The Journal of Technology Transfer

Abstract

The literature on how network-based incubation influences the performance of technology-based start-ups has recently grown considerably and provided valuable insights. However, at the same time this literature has become quite fragmented, inconsistently conceptualised, and theoretically underdeveloped. Therefore, this article uses three management theories to structure the literature, improve the theoretical underpinning and develop an agenda for further research. The management theories are the resource-based view, knowledge-based view, organisational learning, and social capital theory. We find that the network-based incubation literature has convincingly shown that network-based incubation provides start-ups with resources, capabilities, knowledge, learning and social capital. However, the influence of these intermediary benefits on start-up performance is ambiguous. There is a considerable opportunity to advance the network-based incubation literature with contemporary insights from management theories. We propose an agenda for further research on network-based incubation that leads to a fine-grained model of the mechanisms and impact of network-based incubation that goes beyond taken for granted assumptions about the positive impact of network-based incubation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10961-016-9510-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Eveleens, C. P., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & Niesten, E. M. M. I.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Eveleens, Chris P.
Venue
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2016-10-04
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
676-713
ISSN
  • 0892-9912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7047
OpenAlex
W2529741665
Cited by
162
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Technology Transfer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
EIT Climate KIC
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Private Equity and Venture Capital
Keywords
new venture performance, technology startups, resource-based view, knowledge-based view, organizational learning, social capital theory, management theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review