Cited by 728Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFirm Innovation and GrowthPrivate Equity and Venture Capital

Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: a validation study

Chandler, Gaylen N., Hanks, Steven H.·1993·Journal of Business Venturing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0883-9026(93)90021-v

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chandler, G. N., & Hanks, S. H.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Chandler, Gaylen N.
Venue
Journal of Business Venturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-09
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
391-408
ISSN
0883-9026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004016061
Cited by
728
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 34
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Venturing (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Private Equity and Venture Capital
Keywords
new venture performance, performance measurement, self-reported performance, subjective performance measures, business growth, business volume, content validity, inter-rater reliability, generalizability, manufacturing companies, startups, startup success factors, scale validation, disclosure rates, internal consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review