Cited by 697Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychosocial Factors Impacting Youth

Characteristics of adolescents who report very high life satisfaction

Gilman, Rich, Huebner, E. Scott·2006·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-006-9036-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2006-05-12
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
293-301
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2078826677
Cited by
697
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 32
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth
Keywords
life satisfaction, adolescents, adaptive behavior, social stress, attitudes toward teachers, interpersonal functioning, school functioning, psychological symptoms, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review