Cited by 240Education Discipline and InequalityCrime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

From the school yard to the squad car: school discipline, truancy, and arrest

Monahan, Kathryn C., VanDerhei, Susan, Bechtold, Jordan, Cauffman, Elizabeth·2014·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Since the 1990's, implementation of zero tolerance policies in schools has led to increased use of school suspension and expulsion as disciplinary techniques for students with varying degrees of infractions. An unintended consequence of zero tolerance policies is that school suspension or expulsion may increase risk for contact with the juvenile justice system. In the present study, we test how forced absence from school via suspension or expulsion and chosen absence from school (truancy) are associated with the likelihood of being arrested. Using month-level data from 6,636 months from a longitudinal study of delinquent adolescents (N = 1,354; 13.5 % female; 41.5 % Black, 33.5 % Hispanic-American, 20.2 % White), we compare the likelihood of being arrested, within individuals, for months when youth were and were not suspended or expelled from school and for months when youth were and were not truant. Finally, we test if these associations were moderated by stable demographic characteristics (sex, race, age, history of problem behaviors) and time-varying contextual factors (peer delinquency, parental monitoring, and commitment to school). Being suspended or expelled from school increased the likelihood of arrest in that same month and this effect was stronger among youth who did not have a history of behavior problems and when youth associated with less delinquent peers. Truancy independently contributed to the likelihood of arrest, but this association was explained by differences in parental monitoring and school commitment. Thus, school disciplinary action places youth at risk for involvement in the juvenile justice system and this may be especially true for less risky youth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-014-0103-1

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monahan, K. C., VanDerhei, S., Bechtold, J., & Cauffman, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Monahan, Kathryn C.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2014-02-14
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
1110-1122
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2141336373
Cited by
240
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
92.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA019697)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
school suspension, school expulsion, truancy, zero tolerance policy, juvenile arrests, student discipline, juvenile justice system involvement, delinquent adolescents, peer delinquency, parental supervision, school commitment, race and gender differences
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Juvenile Delinquency, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Models, Psychological, Punishment, Risk Factors, Schools, Models, Statistical, Law Enforcement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review