Cited by 21Youth Development and Social SupportOutdoor and Experiential EducationMentoring and Academic Development

Engagement and mentor support as drivers of social development in the project K youth development program

Chapman, Cassandra M., Deane, Kelsey L., Harré, Niki, Courtney, Matthew G. R., Moore, Julie·2017·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

Youth development programs can achieve positive social outcomes, however studies comparing the influence of different program components are rare. Structural equation modeling of longitudinal, multilevel data (N = 327) from Project K, a multi-component youth development program, assessed how experiences of engagement or support in each component affected social outcomes. Participants reported significant gains in social self-efficacy and sense of community after the program. Engagement in the outdoor adventure and support during the mentoring partnership components significantly contributed to observed social gains, while engagement in the community service component did not. Results confirm youth development programs can positively influence adolescent social development, while highlighting the importance of moving beyond "black box" investigations in order to maximize program impact and efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-017-0640-5

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mentors' rated support was related to an increase in empathy, cooperation, self-control, assertiveness, social self-efficacy, and sense of community.

    “Mentors’ rated support was also related to an increase in empathy, cooperation, self-control, assertiveness [49], social self-efficacy, and sense of community [50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chapman, C. M., Deane, K. L., Harré, N., Courtney, M. G. R., & Moore, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Chapman, Cassandra M.
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2017-01-31
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
644-655
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2585210227
Cited by
21
References
60
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Outdoor and Experiential Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
Keywords
youth development programs, adolescent social development, program engagement, mentoring, social self-efficacy, sense of community, outdoor adventure, community service
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Mentors, Social Change, Program Development, Self Efficacy, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review