CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportCrime Patterns and Interventions

Relational dynamics in formal youth mentoring programmes: A longitudinal investigation into the association between relationship satisfaction and youth outcomes?

Open access
Silke, Charlotte, Brady, Bernadine, Dolan, Pat·2019·Children and Youth Services Review
DOI 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.020

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A critical limitation of some studies is that few included control groups or used reports from the same informant on the quality of the relationship or the level of functioning, thus possibly creating shared method variance.

    “Nevertheless, a critical limitation of some of these studies is that few included control groups or used reports from the same informant (usually the mentees) on the quality of the relationship or the level of functioning, thus possibly creating shared method variance (e.g., [52,53,54,61,64]).”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [61]

  • Mentees' perceptions of support and help from their mentors, happiness, and mentor satisfaction were positively associated with the mentees' academic, social, and emotional outcomes in BBBS in Ireland.

    “Mentees’ perceptions of support and help from their mentors, happiness, and mentor satisfaction were positively associated with the mentees’ academic outcomes (e.g., liking school, scholastic efficacy, grades, education plans), social outcomes (e.g., social acceptance, parental trust, social support from parents, siblings, and other adults), and emotional outcomes (e.g., hope) in BBBS in Ireland [”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Silke, C., Brady, B., & Dolan, P.
Affiliations
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Silke, Charlotte
ORCID
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
104
Pages
104343
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.05.020
OpenAlex
W2946363031
Cited by
16
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Galway Research Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Children's Research Network
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
youth mentoring, mentoring relationship quality, relational dynamics, program evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review