The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relative significance of habitat patches within the total matrix of landscape connectivity is modelled through network graphs and habitat availability indices (e.g. IIC and NL).
“The relative significance of habitat patches within the total matrix of landscape connectivity is modelled through network graphs and habitat availability indices (e.g. Integral Index of Connectivity (IIC) and Number of Links (NL)) (Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006; Saura & Rubio 2010).”
From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006
Their program, Conefor Sensinode, was developed to establish the relative significance of habitat zones or patches for the entire functionally connected landscape.
“Their program, Conefor Sensinode, was developed to establish the relative significance of habitat zones or patches for the entire functionally connected landscape.”
From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006
Pascual-Hortal and Saura (2006) recommend employing the Integral Index of Connectivity (IIC) to establish a baseline for connectivity.
“Pascual-Hortal and Saura (Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006, p. 962) recommend employing the Integral Index of Connectivity (IIC) to establish a baseline for connectivity.”
From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006, p. 962
The relative significance of habitat patches within the total matrix of landscape connectivity is modelled through network graphs and habitat availability indices.
“The relative significance of habitat patches within the total matrix of landscape connectivity is modelled through network graphs and habitat availability indices (e.g. Integral Index of Connectivity (IIC) and Number of Links (NL)) (Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006; Saura & Rubio 2010).”
From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006
The NL index of connectivity provides a comparative benchmark for the recommended IIC index because Pascual-Hortal and Saura's investigations determine that it has the advantage of remaining the most stable index when facing changes.
“The NL index of connectivity provides a comparative benchmark for the recommended IIC index, as Pascual-Hortal and Saura’s investigations determine that it has the advantage of remaining the most stable index when facing changes (Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006, p. 963).”
From Exploratory GIS: modelling past land use and occupancy with functional connectivity, willandra lakes region world heritage area, NSW, australia (2022) · cites this paper as Pascual-Hortal & Saura 2006, p. 963
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- A.G. Bunn, 2000, J. Environ. Manag., 59, 265, 10.1006/jema.2000.0373 · DOI
- J.M. Calabrese, 2004, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2, 529, 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- C. Grashof-Bokdam, 1997, J. Veg. Sci., 8, 21, 10.2307/3237238 · DOI
- J.A.G. Jaeger, 2000, Landsc. Ecol., 15, 115, 10.1023/A:1008129329289 · DOI
- A.R. Johnson, 1992, Landsc. Ecol., 7, 63, 10.1007/BF02573958 · DOI
- F. Jordan, 2003, Landsc. Ecol., 18, 83, 10.1023/A:1022958003528 · DOI
- T.H. Keitt, 1997, Conserv. Ecol. [online], 1, 4, 10.5751/ES-00015-010104 · DOI
- H.B. Li, 2004, Landsc. Ecol., 19, 389, 10.1023/B:LAND.0000030441.15628.d6 · DOI
- A. Moilanen, 2002, Ecology, 83, 1131, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:SCMISE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- H.R. Pulliam, 1988, Am. Nat., 132, 652, 10.1086/284880 · DOI
- C. Ricotta, 2000, Commun. Ecol., 1, 89, 10.1556/ComEc.1.2000.1.12 · DOI
- P. Schippers, 1996, Ecography, 19, 97, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb00160.x · DOI
- N.H. Schumaker, 1996, Ecology, 77, 1210, 10.2307/2265590 · DOI · Paper page
- V.M. Stevens, 2004, Landsc. Ecol., 19, 829, 10.1007/s10980-004-0166-6 · DOI
- P.D. Taylor, 1993, Oikos, 3, 571, 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
- L. Tischendorf, 2000a, Landsc. Ecol., 15, 633, 10.1023/A:1008177324187 · DOI
- L. Tischendorf, 2000b, Oikos, 90, 7, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x · DOI
- D. Urban, 2001, Ecology, 82, 1205, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- G. Verbeylen, 2003, Landsc. Ecol., 18, 791, 10.1023/B:LAND.0000014492.50765.05 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
USING CIRCUIT THEORY TO MODEL CONNECTIVITY IN ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION
McRae, B. H., Dickson, B. G., Keitt, T. H., & Shah, V. B. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1861.1 · Cited by 2,244
Thomas, K. (2022) · Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology · doi:10.5334/jcaa.98 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Pascual-Hortal, L., & Saura, S.
- Venue
- Landscape Ecology
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 959-967
- ISSN
- 0921-2973
- 1572-9761
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
