CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values

Rayfield, Bronwyn, Fortin, Marie-Josée, Fall, Andrew·2010·Landscape Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Network-based connectivity statistics are often dependent on an assumed graph-theoretic model and are often computer resource-limited as larger areas are considered.

    “Network-based representations can be analyzed to derive meaningful connectivity statistics [22]–[25], though these are often dependent on an assumed graph-theoretic model (e.g., complete graph, minimum planar graph) [19] and are often computer resource-limited as larger areas are considered [26].”

    From Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity (2014) · cites this paper as [24]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, Matthysen E (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape Urban Plan 64:233–247 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE (1993) Composition analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325 · DOI
  3. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366 · DOI
  4. Andrén H (1999) Habitat fragmentation, the random sample hypothesis and critical thresholds. Oikos 84:306–308 · DOI
  5. Beazley K, Smandych L, Snaith T, Mackinnon F, Austen-Smith Jr, P, Duinker P (2005) Biodiversity considerations in conservation system planning: map-based approach for Nova Scotia, Canada. Ecol Appl 15:2192–2208 · DOI
  6. Bélisle M (2005) Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. Ecology 86:1988–1995 · DOI
  7. Bowne DR, Bowers MA (2004) Interpatch movements in spatially structured populations: a literature review. Landscape Ecol 19:1–20 · DOI
  8. Boyce MS, McDonald LL (1999) Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. Trends Ecol Evol 14:268–272 · DOI
  9. Brooks CP (2003) A scalar analysis of landscape connectivity. Oikos 102:433–439 · DOI
  10. Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2001) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manag 59:265–278 · DOI
  11. Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2:529–536 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chardon JP, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2003) Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure: a case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landscape Ecol 18:561–573 · DOI
  13. Chetkiewicz C-LB, Cassady St. Clair C, Boyce M (2006) Corridors for conservation: integrating pattern and process. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:317–342 · DOI
  14. Clevenger AP, Wierzchowski J, Chruszcz B, Gunson K (2002) GIS-generated, expert-based models for identifying wildlife habitat linkages and planning mitigation passages. Conserv Biol 16:503–514 · DOI
  15. Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) (2006) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York
  16. Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499 · DOI · Paper page
  17. D’Eon RG, Glenn SM, Parfitt I, Fortin M-J (2002) Landscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape. Conserv Ecol 6(2):10. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss2/art10/ · DOI
  18. Drielsma M, Manion G, Ferrier S (2007) The spatial links tool: automated mapping of habitat linkages in variegated landscapes. Ecol Model 200:403–411 · DOI
  19. Driezen K, Adriaensen F, Rondinini C, Doncaster CP, Matthysen E (2007) Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: a case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecol Model 209:314–322 · DOI
  20. Epps CW, Wehausen JD, Bleich VC, Torres SG, Brashares JS (2007) Optimizing dispersal and corridor models using landscape genetics. J Appl Ecol 44:714–724 · DOI
  21. Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag 61:603–610 · DOI
  22. Fahrig L (1998) When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival? Ecol Model 105:273–292 · DOI
  23. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fahrig L (2007) Non-optimal animal movement in human-altered landscapes. Funct Ecol 21:1003–1015 · DOI
  25. Fall A, Fortin M-J, Manseau M, O’Brien D (2007) Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity. Ecosystems 10:448–461 · DOI
  26. Ferreras P (2001) Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx. Biol Conserv 100:125–136 · DOI
  27. Gonzales EK, Gergel SE (2007) Testing assumptions of cost surface analysis-a tool for invasive species management. Landscape Ecol 22:1155–1168 · DOI
  28. Goodwin BJ, Fahrig L (2002a) Effect of landscape structure on the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis. Can J Zool 80:24–35 · DOI
  29. Goodwin BJ, Fahrig L (2002b) How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity? Oikos 99:552–570 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Graham CH (2001) Factors influencing movement patterns of Keel-billed Toucans in a fragmented tropical landscape in southern Mexico. Conserv Biol 15:1789–1798 · DOI
  31. Haddad NM, Tewksbury JJ (2005) Low quality habitat corridors as movement conduits for two butterfly species. Ecol Appl 15:250–257 · DOI
  32. Halpin PN, Bunn AG (2000) Using GIS to compute a least-cost distance matrix: a comparison of terrestrial and marine ecological applications. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ESRI user conference, pp 1–19
  33. Harary F (1969) Graph theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading · DOI
  34. Hilty JA, Lidicker WZJ, Merenlender AM (2006) Corridor ecology: the science and practice of linking landscapes for biodiversity conservation. Island, Washington, DC
  35. Hufkens K, Ceulemans R, Scheunders P (2008) Estimating the ecotone width in patchy ecotones using a sigmoid wave approach. Ecol Inform 3:97–104 · DOI
  36. Johnson CJ, Gillingham MP (2004) Mapping uncertainty: sensitivity of wildlife habitat ratings to expert opinion. J Appl Ecol 41:1032–1041 · DOI
  37. Kautz R, Kawula R, Hoctor T, Comiskey J, Jansen D, Jennings D, Kasbohm J, Mazzotti F, McBride R, Richardson L, Root K (2006) How much is enough? Landscape-scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biol Conserv 130:118–133 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Keil JM, Gutwin CA (1992) Classes of graphs which approximate the complete Euclidean graph. Discret Comput Geom 7:13–28 · DOI
  39. Keitt T, Urban D, Milne BT (1997) Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Ecol Soc 1:4
  40. Knappen JP, Scheffer M, Harms B (1992) Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plan 23:1–16 · DOI
  41. LaRue MA, Nielsen CK (2008) Modelling potential dispersal corridors for cougars in midwestern North America using least-cost path methods. Ecol Model 212:372–381 · DOI
  42. Li H, Reynolds JF (1994) A simulation experiment to quantify spatial heterogeneity in categorical maps. Ecology 75:2446–2455 · DOI
  43. Magle SB, Theobald DM, Crooks KR (2009) A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landscape Ecol 24:267–280 · DOI
  44. Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Kluwer, Dordrecht
  45. Matter SF (2003) Modeling the density—area relationship in a dynamic landscape: an examination for the beetle Tetraopes tetraophthalmus and a generalized model. Ecol Model 169:103–117 · DOI
  46. Mönkkönen M, Reunanen P (1999) On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: a management perspective. Oikos 84:302–305 · DOI
  47. O’Brien D, Manseau M, Fall A, Fortin M-J (2006) Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory. Biol Conserv 130:70–83 · DOI
  48. Pinto N, Keitt TH (2009) Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach. Landscape Ecol 24:253–266 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Pressey RL, Cowling RM, Rouget M (2003) Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol Conserv 112:99–127 · DOI
  50. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99 · DOI
  51. Riitters K, Wickham J, O’Neill R, Jones B, Smith E (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conserv Ecol 4: 3. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art3/ · DOI
  52. Rouget M, Cowling RM, Lombard AT, Knight AT, Kerley GIH (2006) Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv Biol 20:549–561 · DOI
  53. Schadt S, Knauer F, Kaczensky P, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Trepl L (2002) Rule-based assessment of suitable habitat and patch connectivity for the Eurasian lynx. Ecol Appl 12:1469–1483 · DOI
  54. Stevens VM, Polus E, Wesselingh RA, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2004) Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistance in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Landscape Ecol 19:829–842 · DOI
  55. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Theobald DM (2006) Exploring the functional connectivity of landscapes using landscape networks. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 416–443 · DOI
  57. Tischendorf L (2001) Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landscape Ecol 16:235–254 · DOI
  58. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000a) How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecol 15:633–641 · DOI
  59. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000b) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos 90:7–19 · DOI
  60. Tischendorf L, Bender DJ, Fahrig L (2003) Evaluation of patch isolation metrics in mosaic landscapes for specialist vs. generalist dispersers. Landscape Ecol 18:41–50 · DOI
  61. Treml EA, Halpin PN, Urban DL, Pratson LF (2008) Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation. Landscape Ecol 23:19–36 · DOI
  62. Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218 · DOI
  63. Urban D, Minor ES, Treml EA, Schick RS (2009) Graph models of habitat mosaics. Ecol Lett 12:260–273 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Verbeylen G, De Bruyn L, Adriaensen F, Matthysen E (2003) Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecol 18:791–805 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Walker W, Craighead FL (1997) Analyzing wildlife movement corridors in Montana using GIS. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ESRI user conference, pp 1–18
  66. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397 · DOI · Paper page
  67. With KA, Gardner RH, Turner MG (1997) Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78:151–169 · DOI
  68. With KA, Cadaret SJ, Davis C (1999) Movement responses to patch structure in experimental fractal landscapes. Ecology 80:1340–1353 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rayfield, B., Fortin, M.-J., & Fall, A.
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-12-10
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
519-532
ISSN
  • 0921-2973
  • 1572-9761
DOI
10.1007/s10980-009-9436-7
Cited by
229
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review