CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,342

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model

Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J.P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., Matthysen, E.·2003·Landscape and Urban Planning
DOI 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00242-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00242-6

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several authors have alluded to the idea that artificial boundaries might influence the results of least cost path and landscape resistance models, but no one has directly addressed the issue.

    “Several authors have alluded to the idea that artificial boundaries might influence the results of least cost path and landscape resistance models [2], [11], [15]–[18], but to our knowledge, no one has directly addressed the issue.”

    From The effect of map boundary on estimates of landscape resistance to animal movement (2010) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Adriaensen, F., Chardon, P., Gulinck, H., De Blust, G., Verhagen, R., Matthysen, E., 2000. Kwantitatieve evaluatie van de verbindingsfunctie van landschappelijke elementen aan de hand van connectiviteitsmodellen. Eindverslag van VLINA project 97/01. Studie uitgevoerd voor rekening van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap binnen het kader van het Vlaams Impulsprogramma Natuurontwikkeling in opdracht van de Vlaamse minister bevoegd voor natuurbehoud, Brussel. pp. 138 (in Dutch).
  2. Bélisle, M., St. Clair, C.C., 2001. Cumulative effects of barriers on the movements of forest birds. Cons. Ecol. 5 (2), 9 (online, URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art9). · DOI
  3. Brooker, L., Brooker, M., Cale, P., 1999. Animal dispersal in fragmented habitat: measuring habitat connectivity, corridor use and dispersal mortality. Cons. Ecol. 3, 4 (online, URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art4). · DOI
  4. Bunn, 2000, Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory, J. Environ. Manage., 59, 265, 10.1006/jema.2000.0373 · DOI
  5. Desrochers, 1997, Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period, Cons. Biol., 11, 1204, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96187.x · DOI
  6. Ehrlich, 1986, Non-adaptive hilltopping behavior in male checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas editha), Am. Nat., 127, 477, 10.1086/284496 · DOI
  7. Ferreras, 2001, Landscape structure and asymmetrical inter-patch connectivity in a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx, Biol. Cons., 100, 125, 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00213-5 · DOI
  8. Fry, G.L.A., Robson, W.J., 1994. The effects of field margins on butterfly movement. In: Boatman, N. (Ed.), Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation. BCPC Monograph 58, BCPC Publications, Farnham, Surrey, UK, pp. 111–116. · DOI
  9. Graham, 2001, Factors influencing movement patterns of keel-billed toucans in a fragmented tropical landscape in southern Mexico, Cons. Biol., 15, 1789, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00070.x · DOI
  10. Gulinck, 1993, Satellite images for detection of changes in rural landscapes: a landscape ecological perspective, EARSeL Adv. Remote Sensing, 2, 84
  11. Gustafson, 1996, The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization, Ecology, 77, 94, 10.2307/2265659 · DOI
  12. Halpin, N.P., Bunn, A.G., 2000. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ESRI User Conference on Using GIS to Compute a Least-Cost Distance Matrix: A Comparison of Terrestrial and Marine Ecological Applications. San Diego, CA, pp. 1–19.
  13. Hanski, 1994, A practical model of metapopulation dynamics, J. Anim. Ecol., 63, 151, 10.2307/5591 · DOI
  14. Hanski, 1999, Habitat connectivity, habitat continuity, and metapopulations in dynamic landscapes, Oikos, 87, 209, 10.2307/3546736 · DOI
  15. Harms, B.W., Opdam, P., Forman, 1989. Woods as habitat patches for birds: application in landscape planning in The Netherlands. In: Zonneveld, I.S., Forman, R.T.T. (Eds.), Changing landscapes. An Ecological Perspective. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 73–96. · DOI
  16. Harris, L.D., 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. · DOI
  17. Knaapen, 1992, Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning, Land Urban Plan., 23, 1, 10.1016/0169-2046(92)90060-D · DOI
  18. Lovejoy, T.E., Bierregaard Jr., R.O., Rylands, A.B., Malcolm, J.R., Quintela, C.E., Harper, L.H., Brown Jr., K.S., Powell, A.H., Powell, G.V.N., Schubart, H.O.R., Hays, M.B., 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In: M.E. Soulé (Ed.), Conservation Biology—The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA, pp. 257–285.
  19. Michels, 2001, Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modelling of the effective geographical distance, Mol. Ecol., 10, 1929, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01340.x · DOI
  20. Moilanen, 2001, On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology, Oikos, 95, 147, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950116.x · DOI
  21. O’Neill, J., Dyer, S., Wasel, S., 2000. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ESRI International User Conference on Using GPS and GIS Analysis to Investigate the Effect of Industrial Development on an Endangered Species, San Diego, CA, pp. 1–12.
  22. Ricketts, 2001, The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes, Am. Nat., 158, 87, 10.1086/320863 · DOI
  23. Schadt, 2002, Rule-based assessment of suitable habitat and patch connectivity for Eurasian Lynx in Germany, Ecol. Appl., 12, 1469, 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[1469:RBAOSH]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  24. Taylor, 1993, Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure, Oikos, 68, 571, 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Tischendorf, 2000, On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity, Oikos, 90, 7, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x · DOI
  26. Tischendorf, 2001, On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. A reply, Oikos, 95, 152, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950117.x · DOI
  27. Van Apeldoorn, 1998, Applying ecological knowledge in landscape planning: a simulation model as a tool to evaluate scenarios for the badger in The Netherlands, Land Urban Plan., 41, 57, 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00058-3 · DOI
  28. Verboom, 1990, Effects of habitat fragmentation on the red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris L., Land Ecol., 4, 171, 10.1007/BF00132859 · DOI
  29. Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., Verbeylen, G., Matthysen, E., 1998. Relationschip between patch connectivity and the occurence of the European red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris, in forest fragments within heterogeneuos landscapes. In: Dover, J.W., Bunce, R.G.H. (Eds.), Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology. Preston, pp. 205–220.
  30. Vos, 1998, Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog Rana arvalis, J. Appl. Ecol., 35, 44, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00284.x · DOI
  31. Walker, R., Craighead, L., 1997. In: Proceedings of the ESRI European User Conference on Analyzing Wildlife Movement Corridors in Montana Using GIS, Copenhagen, 1997, pp. 1–18.
  32. Whitcomb, R.F., Robbins, C.S., Lynch, J.F., Whitcomb, B.L., Klimkiewicz, M.K., Bystrak, D., 1981. Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. In: Burgess, R.L., Sharpe, D.M. (Eds.), Forest Island Dynamics in Man-Dominated Landscapes. Springer, Berlin. · DOI
  33. Wiens, J.A., 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In: Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E. (Eds.), Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, London, p. 512. · DOI
  34. Wiens, 1997, Patchy landscapes and animal movements: do beetles percolate?, Oikos, 78, 257, 10.2307/3546292 · DOI
  35. Xu, 1994, Improving cost-path tracing in a raster data format, Comp. Geosci., 20, 1455, 10.1016/0098-3004(94)90105-8 · DOI
  36. Xu, 1995, Improving simulation accuracy of spread phenomena in a raster-based Geographic Information System, Int. J. Geo. Inf. Syst., 9, 153, 10.1080/02693799508902031 · DOI
  37. Zollner, 2000, Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes, Land Ecol., 15, 523, 10.1023/A:1008154532512 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., & Matthysen, E.
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
233-247
ISSN
0169-2046
DOI
10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00242-6
Cited by
1,342
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review