The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graph models of habitat mosaics
Abstract
Graph theory is a body of mathematics dealing with problems of connectivity, flow, and routing in networks ranging from social groups to computer networks. Recently, network applications have erupted in many fields, and graph models are now being applied in landscape ecology and conservation biology, particularly for applications couched in metapopulation theory. In these applications, graph nodes represent habitat patches or local populations and links indicate functional connections among populations (i.e. via dispersal). Graphs are models of more complicated real systems, and so it is appropriate to review these applications from the perspective of modelling in general. Here we review recent applications of network theory to habitat patches in landscape mosaics. We consider (1) the conceptual model underlying these applications; (2) formalization and implementation of the graph model; (3) model parameterization; (4) model testing, insights, and predictions available through graph analyses; and (5) potential implications for conservation biology and related applications. In general, and for a variety of ecological systems, we find the graph model a remarkably robust framework for applications concerned with habitat connectivity. We close with suggestions for further work on the parameterization and validation of graph models, and point to some promising analytic insights.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A large and growing number of studies employ network-based connectivity models representing a landscape as high-quality habitat nodes with links connecting pairs of nodes if movement is possible between them.
“A large and growing number of studies employ network-based connectivity models, in which a landscape is represented as a set of high-quality habitat nodes, with links connecting pairs of nodes if movement is possible between them [12]–[17].”
From Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity (2014) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534
Borgatti, S. P. (2005) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008 · Cited by 3,191
Barabási, A.-L., & Bonabeau, E. (2003) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60 · Cited by 2,494
USING CIRCUIT THEORY TO MODEL CONNECTIVITY IN ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION
McRae, B. H., Dickson, B. G., Keitt, T. H., & Shah, V. B. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1861.1 · Cited by 2,244
McRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 80
- 10.1007/s10980-007-9132-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00942.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/04-0923 · DOI
- Best B., 2008, ConnMod: connectivity modeling toolbox
- 10.1007/s10980-006-9015-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01556726 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10588-006-7084-x · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.11511.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1935620 · DOI
- 10.1006/jema.2000.0373 · DOI
- 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00125131 · DOI
- Chartrand G., 1977, Introductory Graph Theory
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110050 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.002 · DOI
- Crooks K.R., 2006, Conservation Connectivity: Maintaining Connections for Nature, 10.1017/CBO9780511754821 · DOI
- 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
- D’Eon R.G., 2002, Landscape connectivity as a function of scale and organism vagility in a real forested landscape, Conserv. Ecol., 6, 10
- 10.1007/b97276 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01386390 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2064:VILSEE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1890/07-1419.1 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03530.x · DOI
- 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0820:ADSLHR]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10021-007-9038-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecocom.2003.10.002 · DOI
- Freeman L.C., 2004, The Development of Social Network Analysis – A Study in the Sociology of Science
- Gardner R.H., 2003, Models in Ecosystem Science, 184
- 10.1073/pnas.122653799 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10980-006-9073-3 · DOI
- 10.2307/2265659 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00548.x · DOI
- 10.1038/35008063 · DOI
- Harrison S., 1994, Large‐Scale Ecology and Conservation Biology, 111
- 10.5670/oceanog.2007.30 · DOI
- 10.1007/0-387-21563-8_7 · DOI
- 10.5751/ES-00015-010104 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02115 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1367943003001100 · DOI
- Legendre P., 1998, Numerical Ecology
- 10.1093/besa/15.3.237 · DOI
- MacArthur R.H., 1967, The Theory of Island Biogeography
- Margosian M.L., Connectivity of the American agricultural landscape: asessing the national risk of crop pest and disease spread, Bioscience
- 10.2193/2006-380 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0706568104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00386.x · DOI
- 10.1890/06-1073.1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00871.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.12.032 · DOI
- Minor E.S., The role of landscape connectivity in assembling exotic plant communities: a network analysis, Ecology
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.016128 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3027989 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00369.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.014 · DOI
- 10.1890/02-0706 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/07-0507.1 · DOI
- 10.2307/3544422 · DOI
- Pinto N., 2008, Beyond the least‐cost path: two graph theory methods that assess corridor redundancy, Landscape Ecol.
- 10.1086/284880 · DOI
- Rayfield B., 2008, Paper presented at 23rd Annual Landscape Ecology Symposium
- 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10666-005-4697-2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01383.x · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203211595 · DOI
- 10.1038/35065725 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511754821.019 · DOI
- Thompson F.R., 2002, Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Birds in Western Landscapes: Contrasts with Paradigms from the Eastern United States, 8
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10980-007-9138-y · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511613654.016 · DOI
- 10.1890/04-0918 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Urban D.L., 1986, Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates, 273
- 10.1007/1-4020-4663-4_13 · DOI
- 10.1515/9780691188331 · DOI
- 10.1038/30918 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3565577 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Howey, M. C. L. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.024 · Cited by 168
Pelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158
The effect of map boundary on estimates of landscape resistance to animal movement
Koen, E. L., Garroway, C. J., Wilson, P. J., & Bowman, J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011785 · Cited by 148
Designer Ecosystems: Incorporating Design Approaches into Applied Ecology
Ross, M. R. V., Bernhardt, E. S., Doyle, M. W., & Heffernan, J. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-121012-100957 · Cited by 52
Modeling Marronage: GIS Heuristics of Refuge Affordances in Colonial St. Croix
Kohut, L. E., Wernke, S. A., & Dunnavant, J. (2025) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-024-09680-7 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Urban, D. L., Minor, E. S., Treml, E. A., & Schick, R. S.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 260-273
- ISSN
- 1461-023X
- 1461-0248
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review