Scale dependent inference in landscape genetics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Circuit theory connectivity models are generally seen to be robust to coarsening of input data, which can enable computation across very large areas at coarse pixel resolution.
“Circuit theory connectivity models are generally seen to be robust to coarsening of input data [53], which can enable computation across very large areas at coarse pixel resolution [28], [57].”
From Applying circuit theory for corridor expansion and management at regional scales: tiling, pinch points, and omnidirectional connectivity (2014) · cites this paper as [53]
Cites
McRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 46
- Balkenhol N, Gugerli F, Cushman SA, Waits LP, Coulon A, Arntzen JW, Holderegger R, Wagner HH, Arens P, Campagne P, Dale VH, Nicieza AG, Smulders MJM, Tedesco E, Wang H, Wasserman TN (2009) Identifying future research needs in landscape genetics: where to from here? Landscape Ecol 24:455–463 · DOI
- Bowcock AM, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic micorsatellites. Nature 368:455–457 · DOI
- Corry RC, Nassauer JI (2005) Limitations of using landscape pattern indices to evaluate the ecological consequences of alternative plans and designs. Landscape Urban Plan 72:265–280 · DOI
- Coulon A, Cosson JF, Angibault JM, Cargnelutti B, Galan M, Morellet N, Petit E, Aulagnier S, Hewison AJM (2004) Landscape connectivity influences gene flow in a roe deer population inhabiting a fragmented landscape: an individual-based approach. Mol Ecol 13:2841–2850. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02253.x · DOI
- Cushman SA (2006) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol Conserv 128:231–240. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.031 · DOI
- Cushman SA, Landguth EL (in press) Spurious correlations and inference in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol · DOI
- Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene-flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple models with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499 · DOI
- Cushman SA, McGarigal K, Neel M (2008a) Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality, and consistency. Ecol Indic 8:691–703 · DOI
- Cushman SA, McKelvey K, Flather C, McGarigal K (2008b) Testing the use of forest communities to evaluate biological diversity. Frontiers Ecol Environ 6:13–17 · DOI
- Cushman SA, McGarial K, Gutzwiller K, Evans J (2009) The gradient paradigm: a conceptual and analytical framework for landscape ecology, chap 5. In: Cushman SA, Huettman F (eds) Spatial complexity, informatics and wildlife conservation. Springer, Tokyo
- Dupanloup I, Schneider S, Excoffier L (2001) A simulated annealing approach to define genetic structure of populations. Mol Ecol 58:2021–2036
- Epperson BK, McRae B, Scribner K, Cushman SA, Rosenberg MS, Fortin M-J, James PMA, Murphy M, Manel S, Legendre L, Dale MRT (in press) Utility of computer simulations in landscape genetics. Mol Ecol · DOI
- Francois O, Ancelet S, Guillot G (2006) Bayesian clustering using hidden Markov random fields in spatial population genetics. Genetics 174:805–816 · DOI
- Hargis CD, Bissonette JA, David JL (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecol 13:167–186 · DOI
- Hess G, Bay JM (1997) Generating confidence intervals for composition-based landscape indexes. Landscape Ecol 12:309–320 · DOI
- Holderegger R, Wagner HH (2008) Landscape genetics. Bioscience 58:199–207 · DOI
- Landguth EL, Cushman SA (2010) CDPOP: an individual-based, cost-distance spatial population genetics model. Mol Ecol Resour 10:156–161 · DOI
- Lausch A, Herzog F (2002) Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecol Indic 2:3–15 · DOI
- Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967 · DOI
- Li H, Wu J (2004) Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecol 19:389–399 · DOI
- Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 18:189–197 · DOI
- Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220
- McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2005) The gradient concept of landscape structure. In: Wiens J, Moss M (eds) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 112–119 · DOI
- McRae BH, Beier P (2007) Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19885–19890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706568104 · DOI · Paper page
- Neel MC, Cushman SA, McGarigal K (2004) Behavior and stability of landscape metrics across controlled gradients of landscape structure. Landscape Ecol 19:435–455 · DOI
- Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Peter D (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959 · DOI
- Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecol 10:23–39 · DOI
- Saura S, Martinez-Millan J (2001) Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 67:1027–1036
- Schwartz MK, Copeland JP, Anderson NJ, Squires JR, Inman RM, McKelvey KS, Pilgrim KL, Waits LP, Cushman SA (2009) Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche. Ecology 90:3222–3232 · DOI · Paper page
- Segelbarcher G, Cushman SA, Epperson BK, Fortin M-J, Francois O, Hardy OJ, Holderegger R, Manel S (2010) Applications of landscape genetics in conservation biology: concepts and challenges. Conserv Genet. doi: 10.1007/s10592-009-0044-5 · DOI
- Shao G, Liu D, Zhao G (2001) Relationships of image classification accuracy and variation of landscape statistics. Can J Remote Sens 27:33–43 · DOI
- Shen W, Wu J, Ren H (2003) Effects of changing spatial extent on landscape pattern analysis. Acta Ecol Sin 23:2219–2231
- Smouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst Zool 35:627–632 · DOI
- Storfer A, Murphy MA, Evans JS, Goldberg CS, Robinson S, Spear SF, Dezzani R, Delmelle E, Vierling L, Waits LP (2007) Putting the ‘‘landscape’’ in landscape genetics. Heredity 98:128–142 · DOI
- Thompson CM, McGarigal K (2002) The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York (USA). Landscape Ecol 17:569–586 · DOI
- Tischendor L (2001) Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landscape Ecol 16:235–254 · DOI
- Turner MG, O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT (1989) Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol 3:153–162 · DOI
- Wickham JD, Ritters KH (1995) Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. Int J Remote Sens 16:3585–3594 · DOI
- Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Riitters KH, Wade T, Jones KB (1997) Sensitivity of selected landscape pattern metrics to land-cover misclassification and differences in land-cover composition. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 63:397–402
- Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385–397 · DOI
- Wu J (2004) Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern analysis: scaling relations. Landscape Ecol 19:125–138 · DOI
- Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecol 17:355–365 · DOI
- Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439–466 · DOI
- Wu J, Jelinski DE, Luck M, Tueller PT (2000) Multiscale analysis of landscape heterogeneity: scale variance and pattern metrics. Geogr Inf Syst 6:6–19
- Wu J, Shen W, Sun W, Tueller PT (2002) Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol 17:761–782 · DOI
- Zhao W, Fu B, Chen L (2003) The effects of grain change on landscape indices. Quat Sci 23:326–333
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation
Unnithan Kumar, S., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20370-w · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Cushman, S. A., & Landguth, E. L.
- Venue
- Landscape Ecology
- Published
- 2010-03-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 967-979
- ISSN
- 0921-2973
- 1572-9761
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review