Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche

Schwartz, Michael K., Copeland, Jeffrey P., Anderson, Neil J., Squires, John R., Inman, Robert M., McKelvey, Kevin S., Pilgrim, Kristy L., Waits, Lisette P., Cushman, Samuel A.·2009·Ecology

Abstract

Wolverines (Gulo gulo) are one of the rarest carnivores in the contiguous United States. Effective population sizes in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, where most of the wolverines in the contiguous United States exist, were calculated to be 35 (credible limits, 28–52) suggesting low abundance. Landscape features that influence wolverine population substructure and gene flow are largely unknown. Recent work has identified strong associations between areas with persistent spring snow and wolverine presence and range. We tested whether a dispersal model in which wolverines prefer to disperse through areas characterized by persistent spring snow cover produced least‐cost paths among all individuals that correlated with genetic distance among individuals. Models simulating large preferences for dispersing within areas characterized by persistent spring snow explained the data better than a model based on Euclidean distance. Partial Mantel tests separating Euclidean distance from spring snow‐cover‐based effects indicated that Euclidean distance was not significant in describing patterns of genetic distance. Because these models indicated that successful dispersal paths followed areas characterized by spring snow cover, we used these understandings to derive empirically based least‐cost corridor maps in the U.S. Rocky Mountains. These corridor maps largely explain previously published population subdivision patterns based on mitochondrial DNA and indicate that natural colonization of the southern Rocky Mountains by wolverines will be difficult but not impossible.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/08-1287.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some methods work by connecting source and destination sites, which may not be appropriate for all types of questions.

    “Finally, some methods work by connecting source and destination sites (McRae et al. 2008;Schwartz et al. 2009), which may not be appropriate for all types of questions (Ferrarini 2013).”
  • Schwartz et al. (2009) placed nodes within wolverine (Gulo gulo) breeding habitat and merged multiple least cost paths.

    “Schwartz et al. (2009) placed nodes within wolverine (Gulo gulo) breeding habitat and merged multiple least cost paths.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Allendorf F. W., 2006, Conservation and the genetics of populations
  2. 10.2193/2006-548 · DOI
  3. Banci V., 1994, Wolverine., The scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores in the western United States, 99
  4. 10.1038/368455a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1023/B:LAND.0000018357.45262.b9 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00203.x · DOI
  7. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01969.x · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s10592-006-9126-9 · DOI
  9. Copeland J. P., 1996, Biology of the wolverine in central Idaho
  10. 10.2193/2006-559 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01111.x · DOI
  13. Dallas J. F., 1998, Microsatellite primers for the Eurasian otter., Molecular Ecology, 7, 1247
  14. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00515.x · DOI
  15. Duffy A., 1998, Four polymorphic microsatellites in wolverine, Gulo gulo., Animal Genetics, 29, 63
  16. 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00102-V · DOI
  17. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00701_2.x · DOI
  18. 10.2307/1381300 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040025 · DOI
  20. 10.18637/jss.v022.i07 · DOI
  21. Gude P. H., 2007 Biodiversity consequences of alternative future land use scenarios in Greater Yellowstone., Ecological Applications, 17, 1004, 10.1890/05-1108 · DOI
  22. 10.1534/genetics.104.033803 · DOI
  23. Hall D. K., 2006, MODIS/Terra snow cover daily L3 global 500m grid V004, April 24–May 21, 2000–2006
  24. 10.1139/z81-181 · DOI
  25. Inman R. M., 2007, Wolverine space use in Greater Yellowstone., Greater Yellowstone Wolverine Program, Cumulative Report, 1
  26. Inman R. M., 2004, Wolverine makes extensive movements in Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem., Northwest Science, 78, 261
  27. 10.2193/2007-099 · DOI
  28. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01222.x · DOI
  29. 10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<1141:COPACP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  30. 10.2193/2007-094 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/3801996 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1073/pnas.0706568104 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.3955/046.083.0207 · DOI
  35. 10.1175/BAMS-86-1-39 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90014-4 · DOI
  37. Pasitschniak-Arts M., 1995, Gulo gulo., Mammalian Species, 499, 1
  38. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00689.x · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00843.x · DOI
  41. Raymond M., 1996, Genepop (Version 3.1d): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism., Journal of Heredity, 86, 248, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573 · DOI
  42. 10.1017/S0016672301004906 · DOI
  43. 10.2193/2007-026 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10592-008-9622-1 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1998.tb00040.x · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb05279.x · DOI
  47. Smouse P. E., 1999, Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure., Heredity, 82, 561, 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180 · DOI
  48. 10.2193/2007-053 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01997.x · DOI
  50. 10.1644/BER-121.1 · DOI
  51. 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1326:TEOOGI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  52. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)., 2008, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding on a petition to list the North American wolverine as endangered or threatened., Federal Register, 73, 12929
  53. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01184.x · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03670.x · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2007.02061.x · DOI
  56. 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0186:GVOWGG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1152:TEOWAG]2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, M. K., Copeland, J. P., Anderson, N. J., Squires, J. R., Inman, R. M., McKelvey, K. S., Pilgrim, K. L., Waits, L. P., & Cushman, S. A.
Venue
Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11
Volume
90
Issue
11
Pages
3222-3232
ISSN
  • 0012-9658
  • 1939-9170
Cited by
167
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review