The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wolverine gene flow across a narrow climatic niche
Abstract
Wolverines (Gulo gulo) are one of the rarest carnivores in the contiguous United States. Effective population sizes in Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming, where most of the wolverines in the contiguous United States exist, were calculated to be 35 (credible limits, 28–52) suggesting low abundance. Landscape features that influence wolverine population substructure and gene flow are largely unknown. Recent work has identified strong associations between areas with persistent spring snow and wolverine presence and range. We tested whether a dispersal model in which wolverines prefer to disperse through areas characterized by persistent spring snow cover produced least‐cost paths among all individuals that correlated with genetic distance among individuals. Models simulating large preferences for dispersing within areas characterized by persistent spring snow explained the data better than a model based on Euclidean distance. Partial Mantel tests separating Euclidean distance from spring snow‐cover‐based effects indicated that Euclidean distance was not significant in describing patterns of genetic distance. Because these models indicated that successful dispersal paths followed areas characterized by spring snow cover, we used these understandings to derive empirically based least‐cost corridor maps in the U.S. Rocky Mountains. These corridor maps largely explain previously published population subdivision patterns based on mitochondrial DNA and indicate that natural colonization of the southern Rocky Mountains by wolverines will be difficult but not impossible.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some methods work by connecting source and destination sites, which may not be appropriate for all types of questions.
“Finally, some methods work by connecting source and destination sites (McRae et al. 2008;Schwartz et al. 2009), which may not be appropriate for all types of questions (Ferrarini 2013).”
From Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps (2014) · cites this paper as Schwartz et al. 2009
Schwartz et al. (2009) placed nodes within wolverine (Gulo gulo) breeding habitat and merged multiple least cost paths.
“Schwartz et al. (2009) placed nodes within wolverine (Gulo gulo) breeding habitat and merged multiple least cost paths.”
From Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps (2014) · cites this paper as Schwartz et al. (2009)
Citations
Cites
McRae, B. H. (2006) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00500.x · Cited by 1,081
Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population
COULON, A., GUILLOT, G., COSSON, J. ‐., ANGIBAULT, J. M. A., AULAGNIER, S., CARGNELUTTI, B., GALAN, M., & HEWISON, A. J. M. (2006) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2006.02861.x · Cited by 310
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- Allendorf F. W., 2006, Conservation and the genetics of populations
- 10.2193/2006-548 · DOI
- Banci V., 1994, Wolverine., The scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores in the western United States, 99
- 10.1038/368455a0 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:LAND.0000018357.45262.b9 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00203.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01969.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s10592-006-9126-9 · DOI
- Copeland J. P., 1996, Biology of the wolverine in central Idaho
- 10.2193/2006-559 · DOI
- 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01111.x · DOI
- Dallas J. F., 1998, Microsatellite primers for the Eurasian otter., Molecular Ecology, 7, 1247
- 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00515.x · DOI
- Duffy A., 1998, Four polymorphic microsatellites in wolverine, Gulo gulo., Animal Genetics, 29, 63
- 10.1016/0006-3207(94)00102-V · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00701_2.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1381300 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040025 · DOI
- 10.18637/jss.v022.i07 · DOI
- Gude P. H., 2007 Biodiversity consequences of alternative future land use scenarios in Greater Yellowstone., Ecological Applications, 17, 1004, 10.1890/05-1108 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.104.033803 · DOI
- Hall D. K., 2006, MODIS/Terra snow cover daily L3 global 500m grid V004, April 24–May 21, 2000–2006
- 10.1139/z81-181 · DOI
- Inman R. M., 2007, Wolverine space use in Greater Yellowstone., Greater Yellowstone Wolverine Program, Cumulative Report, 1
- Inman R. M., 2004, Wolverine makes extensive movements in Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem., Northwest Science, 78, 261
- 10.2193/2007-099 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01222.x · DOI
- 10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<1141:COPACP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.2193/2007-094 · DOI
- 10.2307/3801996 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0706568104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3955/046.083.0207 · DOI
- 10.1175/BAMS-86-1-39 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90014-4 · DOI
- Pasitschniak-Arts M., 1995, Gulo gulo., Mammalian Species, 499, 1
- 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00689.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00843.x · DOI
- Raymond M., 1996, Genepop (Version 3.1d): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism., Journal of Heredity, 86, 248, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0016672301004906 · DOI
- 10.2193/2007-026 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10592-008-9622-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-1795.1998.tb00040.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb05279.x · DOI
- Smouse P. E., 1999, Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure., Heredity, 82, 561, 10.1038/sj.hdy.6885180 · DOI
- 10.2193/2007-053 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01997.x · DOI
- 10.1644/BER-121.1 · DOI
- 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1326:TEOOGI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)., 2008, Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12-month finding on a petition to list the North American wolverine as endangered or threatened., Federal Register, 73, 12929
- 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01184.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03670.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2007.02061.x · DOI
- 10.1644/1545-1542(2000)081<0186:GVOWGG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[1152:TEOWAG]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps
Koen, E. L., Bowman, J., Sadowski, C., & Walpole, A. A. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12197 · Cited by 293
Pelletier, D., Clark, M., Anderson, M. G., Rayfield, B., Wulder, M. A., & Cardille, J. A. (2014) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084135 · Cited by 158
The effect of map boundary on estimates of landscape resistance to animal movement
Koen, E. L., Garroway, C. J., Wilson, P. J., & Bowman, J. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011785 · Cited by 148
Lok, S., Lau, T. N. H., Trost, B., Tong, A. H. Y., Wintle, R. F., Engstrom, M. D., Stacy, E., Waits, L. P., Scrafford, M., & Scherer, S. W. (2022) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkac138 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schwartz, M. K., Copeland, J. P., Anderson, N. J., Squires, J. R., Inman, R. M., McKelvey, K. S., Pilgrim, K. L., Waits, L. P., & Cushman, S. A.
- Venue
- Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3222-3232
- ISSN
- 0012-9658
- 1939-9170
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review