Cited by 23Forest Management and PolicyFire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactions between societal goals and restoration of dry forest landscapes in western North America

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-014-0077-0

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Societal factors such as inadequate funding, conflicts among objectives and priority of resource values as well as limited public understanding have created significant delay in the implementation of programs to restore forest resilience to fire.

    “However, societal factors such as inadequate funding, conflicts among objectives and priority of resource values as well as limited public understanding have created significant delay in the implementation of these programs to restore forest resilience to fire (Franklin et al. 2014;Rideout et al. 2014).”

    From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Franklin et al. 2014

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Agee JK (1996) Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington, D. C.
  2. Agee JK, Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For Ecol Manage 211:83–96 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Agee JK, Bahro B, Finney MA, Omi PN, Sapsis DB, Skinner CN, Van Wagtendonk JW, Weatherspoon CP (2000) The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management. For Ecol Manage 127:55–66 · DOI
  4. Ager AA, Vaillant NM, Finney MA (2010) A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. For Ecol Manage 259:1556–1570 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ault T, Cole J, St George S (2012) The amplitude of decadal to multidecadal variability in precipitation simulated by state-of-the-art climate models. Geophys Res Lett 39:L21705 · DOI
  6. Bentz BJ, Régnière J, Fettig CJ, Hansen EM, Hayes JL, Hicke JA, Kelsey RG, Negrón JF, Seybold SJ (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60:602–613 · DOI
  7. Butler WH (2013) Collaboration at arm’s length: navigating agency engagement in landscape-scale ecological restoration collaboratives. J For 111:395–403
  8. Calkin DC, Finney MA, Ager AA, Thompson MP, Gebert KM (2011) Progress towards and barriers to implementation of a risk framework for US federal wildland fire policy and decision making. For Policy Econ 13:378–389 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Collins BM, Stephens SL (2010) Stand-replacing patches within a ‘mixed severity’ fire regime: quantitative characterization using recent fires in a long-established natural fire area. Landscape Ecol 25:927–939 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Collins BM, Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Battles J (2010) Challenges and approaches in planning fuel treatments across fire-excluded forested landscapes. J For 108:24–31 · DOI
  11. Collins BM, Everett RG, Stephens SL (2011) Impacts of fire exclusion and recent managed fire on forest structure in old growth Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forests. Ecosphere 2:1–14 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dale L (2009) The true cost of wildfire in the Western US. Western Forestry Leadership Coalition, Lakewood
  13. Franklin JF, Agee JK (2003) Forging a science-based national forest fire policy. Issues Sci Technol 20:59–66
  14. Franklin JF, Johnson KN (2012) A restoration framework for federal forests in the Pacific Northwest. J. For. 110:429–439
  15. Franklin JF, Van Pelt R (2004) Spatial aspects of structural complexity in old-growth forests. J For 102:22–28
  16. Fulé PZ, Crouse JE, Roccaforte JP, Kalies EL (2012) Do thinning and/or burning treatments in western USA ponderosa or Jeffrey pine-dominated forests help restore natural fire behavior. For Ecol Manage 269:68–81 · DOI
  17. Gaines WL, Harrod RJ, Dickinson J, Lyons AL, Halupka K (2010) Integration of Northern spotted owl habitat and fuels treatments in the eastern Cascades, Washington, USA. For Ecol Manage 260:2045–2052 · DOI
  18. Hagmann RK, Franklin JF, Johnson KN (2013) Historical structure and composition of ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests in south-central Oregon. For Ecol Manage 304:492–504 · DOI
  19. Hagmann RK, Franklin JF, Johnson KN (2014) Historical conditions in mixed-conifer forests on the eastern slopes of the northern Oregon Cascade Range, USA. For Ecol Manage 330:158–170 · DOI
  20. Hammer RB, Radeloff VC, Fried JS, Fried JS, Stewart SI (2007) Wildland–urban interface housing growth during the 1990s in California, Oregon, and Washington. Int J Wildland Fire 16:255–265 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Hessburg PF, Agee JK (2003) An environmental narrative of inland northwest United States forests, 1800–2000. For Ecol Manage 178:23–59 · DOI
  22. Hessburg PF, Agee JK, Franklin JF (2005) Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. For Ecol Manage 211:117–139 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Holden Z, Morgan P, Rollins M, Kavanagh K (2007) Effects of multiple fires on ponderosa pine on stand structure in two southwestern wilderness areas. Fire Ecol 3(2):18–33 · DOI
  24. Hood SM (2010) Mitigating old tree mortality in long-unburned, fire-dependent forests: a synthesis. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-238 · DOI
  25. Kane VR, Lutz JA, Roberts SL, Smith DF, McGaughey RJ, Povak NA, Brooks ML (2013) Landscape-scale effects of fire severity on mixed-conifer and red fir forest structure in Yosemite National Park. For Ecol Manage 287:17–31 · DOI
  26. Kennedy MC, Johnson MC (2014) Fuel treatment prescriptions alter spatial patterns of fire severity in the wildland-urban interface during the Wallow Fire, Arizona, USA. For Ecol Manage 318:122–132 · DOI
  27. Larson AJ, Churchill D (2012) Tree spatial patterns in fire-frequent forests of western North America, including mechanisms of pattern formation and implications for designing fuel reduction and restoration treatments. For Ecol Manage 267:74–92 · DOI
  28. Larson AJ, Belote RT, Cansler CA, Parks SA, Dietz M (2013) Latent resilience in Ponderosa Pine Forest: effects of resumed frequent fire. Ecol, Appl · DOI
  29. Lawler JJ, Tear TH, Pyke C, Shaw MR, Gonzalez P, Kareiva P, Hansen L, Hannah L, Klausmeyer K, Aldous A, Bienz C, Pearsall Sl (2010) Resource management in a changing and uncertain climate. Front Ecol Environ 8:35–43 · DOI
  30. Littell JS, Oneil EE, McKenzie D, Hicke JA, Lutz JA, Norheim RA, Elsner MM (2010) Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington State, USA. Clim Change 49:1–30 · DOI
  31. Merschel AG, Spies TA, Heyerdahl EK (2014) Mixed-conifer forests of central Oregon: Effects of logging and fire exclusion vary with environment. Ecol Appl. doi: 10.1890/13-1585.1 · DOI
  32. Mueller JM, Swaffar W, Nielsen EA, Springer AE, Lopez SM (2013) Estimating the value of watershed services following forest restoration. Water Resour Res 49:1–9 · DOI
  33. North M (2012) Managing Sierra Nevada forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-237. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany. p. 184. Notes · DOI
  34. North M, Stine P, O’Hara K, Zielinski W, Stephens S (2009) An ecosystem management strategy for Sierran mixed-conifer forest. PSW-GTR-220. Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany · DOI · Paper page
  35. North M, Collins BM, Stephens S (2012) Using fire to increase the scale, benefits, and future maintenance of fuels treatments. J For 110:392–401
  36. Noss RF, Franklin JF, Baker WL, Schoennagel T, Moyle PB (2006b) Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Front Ecol Environ 4:481–487 · DOI
  37. Parks SA, Miller C, Nelson CR, Holden ZA (2014) Previous fires moderate burn severity of subsequent wildland fires in two large western US wilderness areas. Ecosystems 17:29–42 · DOI
  38. Perry DA, Jing H, Youngblood A, Oetter DR (2004) Forest structure and fire susceptibility in volcanic landscapes of the eastern High Cascades, Oregon. Conserv Biol 18:913–926 · DOI
  39. Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Hawbaker TJ, Gimmi U, Pidgeon AM, Flather CH, Hammer RB, Helmers DP (2010) Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:940–945 · DOI
  40. Romme WH, Despain DG (1989) Historical perspective on the Yellowstone fires of 1988. Bioscience 39:695–699 · DOI
  41. Ryan KC, Knapp EE, Varner JM (2013) Prescribed fire in North American forests and woodlands: history, current practice, and challenges. Front Ecol Environ 11:e15–e24 · DOI
  42. Safford H, Stevens J, Merriam K, Meyer MD, Latimer AM (2012) Fuel treatment effectiveness in California yellow pine and mixed conifer forests. For Ecol Manage 274:17–28 · DOI
  43. Savage M, Swetnam TW (1990) Early 19th-century fire decline following sheep pasturing in a Navajo ponderosa pine forest. Ecology 71:2374–2378 · DOI
  44. Schoennagel T, Veblen TT, Romme WH (2004) The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests. Bioscience 54:661–676 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Schultz CA, Jedd T, Beam RD (2012) The Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program: a history and overview of the first projects. J For 110:381–391
  46. Schwilk DW, Keeley JE, Knapp EE, McIver J, Bailey JD, Fettig CJ, Fiedler CE, Harrod RJ, Moghaddas JJ, Outcalt KW (2009) The national Fire and Fire Surrogate study: effects of fuel reduction methods on forest vegetation structure and fuels. Ecol Appl 19:285–304 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Sneeuwjagt R, Kline T, Stephens S (2013) Opportunities for improved fire use and management in California: lessons from Western Australia. Fire Ecol 9:14–25 · DOI
  48. Stephens SL, McIver JD, Boerner RE, Fettig CJ, Fontaine JB, Hartsough BR, Kennedy PL, Schwilk DW (2012) The effects of forest fuel-reduction treatments in the United States. Bioscience 62:549–560 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Stine PA, Spies TA, Hessburg PF, Kramer MG, Fettig CJ, Hansen AJ, Lehmkuhl JF, O’Hara KL, Polivka KM, Singleton PH, Charnley S, Merschel A (2013) The ecology and management of moist mixed-conifer forests in eastern Oregon and Washington, a synthesis of the relevant science and implications for future land management. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland · DOI
  50. Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Brennan TJ (2011a) Comparing the role of fuel breaks across southern California national forests. For Ecol Manage 261:2038–2048 · DOI
  51. Syphard AD, Keeley JE, Brennan TJ (2011b) Factors affecting fuel break effectiveness in the control of large fires on the Los Padres National Forest, California. Int J Wildland Fire 20:764–775 · DOI
  52. Taylor AH (2010) Fire disturbance and forest structure in an old-growth Pinus ponderosa forest, southern Cascades, USA. J Veg Sci 21:561–572 · DOI
  53. Toman E, Stidham M, Shindler B, McCaffrey S (2011) Reducing fuels in the wildland–urban interface: community perceptions of agency fuels treatments. Int J Wildland Fire 20:340–349 · DOI
  54. USFS (2010) Draft Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Restoration Strategy: a process for guiding restoration projects within the context of ecosystem management. USDA Forest Service, Wenatchee
  55. Van Pelt R (2008) Identifying old trees and forests in eastern Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia
  56. van Wagtendonk JW (2007) The history and evolution of wildland fire use. Fire Ecol 3:3–17 · DOI
  57. Weaver H (1943) Fire as an ecological and silvicultural factor in the Ponderosa-Pine Region of the pacific slope. J For 41:7–15
  58. Williams J (2013) Exploring the onset of high-impact mega-fires through a forest land management prism. For Ecol Manage 294:4–10 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Williams MA, Baker WL (2014) High-severity fire corroborated in historical dry forests of the western United States: response to Fulé et al. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:831–835 · DOI
  60. Williams MA, Baker WL (2012) Spatially extensive reconstructions show variable-severity fire and heterogeneous structure in historical western United States dry forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:1042–1052 · DOI
  61. Wimberly MC, Liu Z (2014) Interactions of climate, fire, and management in future forests of the Pacific Northwest. For Ecol Manage 327:270–279 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Franklin, J. F., Hagmann, R. K., & Urgenson, L. S.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Franklin, Jerry F.
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Published
2014-08-13
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1645-1655
ISSN
  • 0921-2973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9761
OpenAlex
W2077123879
Cited by
23
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Landscape Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
dry forest restoration, fuel treatment, social goals, ecosystem services, stakeholder trust, fire risk, restoration funding, smoke management, biodiversity habitat, watershed protection, recreation, timber, western North America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review