The Effects of Forest Fuel-Reduction Treatments in the United States
Open accessAbstract
The current conditions of many seasonally dry forests in the western and southern United States, especially those that once experienced low- to moderate-intensity fire regimes, leave them uncharacteristically susceptible to high-severity wildfire. Both prescribed fire and its mechanical surrogates are generally successful in meeting short-term fuel-reduction objectives such that treated stands are more resilient to high-intensity wildfire. Most available evidence suggests that these objectives are typically accomplished with few unintended consequences, since most ecosystem components (vegetation, soils, wildlife, bark beetles, carbon sequestration) exhibit very subtle effects or no measurable effects at all. Although mechanical treatments do not serve as complete surrogates for fire, their application can help mitigate costs and liability in some areas. Desired treatment effects on fire hazards are transient, which indicates that after fuel-reduction management starts, managers need to be persistent with repeated treatment, especially in the faster-growing forests in the southern United States.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
10 of 99 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
In the short term and at the stand scale, fire-surrogate forest-thinning treatments effectively mimic low-severity fire.
“The wildlife literature, which is dominated by studies on birds and small mammals, demonstrates that in the short term and at the stand scale, fire-surrogate forest-thinning treatments effectively mimic low-severity fire”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy and Fontaine 2009
In “Fire and fire-surrogate results” (page unavailable), the synthesis states that fire-surrogate treatments generate different wildlife responses from fire treatments. Its bird-study summary gives stand-level examples: some species responded to thinning but not burning, and others to burning but not thinning. The paper says thinning could be used to mimic fire effects, but does not find that it effectively does so for wildlife in the short term. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
A general pattern observed following mechanical fuel treatments is an increase in understory production and diversity similar to that seen following low-to moderate-intensity fire.
“Therefore, a general pattern observed following mechanical fuel treatments is an increase in understory production and diversity similar to that seen following low-to moderateintensity fire (Bartuszevige and Kennedy 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bartuszevige and Kennedy 2009
- Premisecitation
These habitat features may attract and sustain populations of many vertebrate species.
“which in turn may attract and sustain populations of many vertebrate species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy and Fontaine 2009
- Premisecitation
Tree mortality after prescribed fires can contribute to important wildlife habitat features such as snags and downed logs.
“Tree mortality after prescribed fires can contribute to important habitat features for wildlife, such as snags and downed logs (Kennedy and Fontaine 2009)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy and Fontaine 2009
The “Wildlife Responses to Postfire Conditions” section (page unavailable) says fire creates dead and dying trees, snags, and downed logs that provide wildlife habitat. It does not specifically establish that these features result from tree mortality after prescribed fires, rather than fires generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Fuel treatments can be used in combination across a landscape to mimic the landscape heterogeneity characteristic of low- to moderate- and mixed-severity fire regimes.
“These fuel treatments can be used in combination across a landscape to mimic the landscape heterogeneity characteristic of low-to moderate-and mixed-severity fire regimes (Collins et al. 2011, Perry et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Collins et al. 2011 source
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports considerable variation in historical forest structure across the 4,000-ha study area and suggests variable targets for restoration treatments. It does not say that combining fuel treatments across a landscape would mimic the heterogeneity of low-to-moderate- and mixed-severity fire regimes. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Perry et al. 2011 source
- Findingcitation
Low-severity fire is not a substitute for high-severity fire.
“whereas low-severity fire is not a substitute for high-severity fire (Kennedy and Fontaine 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Kennedy and Fontaine 2009
- Findingcitation
Comparing early-and late-season prescribed fires, Schwilk and colleagues (2006) reported that the levels of tree mortality were related to fire intensity rather than to seasonality and tree phenology in California mixed-conifer forests.
“Comparing early-and late-season prescribed fires, Schwilk and colleagues (2006) reported that the levels of tree mortality were related to fire intensity rather than to seasonality and tree phenology in California mixed-conifer forests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwilk et al. 2006 source
- Findingown data
Across ecosystems in which such treatments are most commonly used (i.e., forests that historically experienced low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes), fire-surrogate treatments have not been shown to produce dramatic negative impacts on plant communities.
“Across ecosystems in which such treatments are most commonly used (i.e., forests that historically experienced low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes), fire-surrogate treatments have not been shown to produce dramatic negative impacts on plant communities (table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites table 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
The mechanical fuel treatments implemented as part of the FFS Study proved more variable in their effects on understory vegetation than on stand structure.
“The mechanical fuel treatments implemented as part of the FFS Study proved more variable in their effects on understory vegetation than on stand structure (Schwilk et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwilk et al. 2009 source
- Findingcitation
The results of mechanical treatments alone are mixed regarding their ability to reduce potential fire severity.
“The results of mechanical treatments alone are mixed regarding their ability to reduce potential fire severity (Agee andSkinner 2005, Stephens et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
An important difference between prescribed-fire treatments and combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatments is the amount of residual dead material left standing after treatment, which is higher after prescribed-fire treatments.
“An important difference between prescribed-fire treatments and combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatments is the amount of residual dead material left standing after treatment, which is higher after prescribedfire treatments (Stephens et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al. 2009 source
- Findingnone given
Increases in understory vegetation richness tend to be greatest in closed-canopy forests that have the lowest understory component prior to treatment.
“Increases in understory vegetation richness tend to be greatest in closed-canopy forests that have the lowest understory component prior to treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Fettig and colleagues (2010) reported that, in the central Sierra Nevada, California, 38%, 42%, and 20% of bark-beetle-caused tree mortality occurred during the first, second, and third years following prescribed fire, respectively.
“Fettig and colleagues (2010) reported that, in the central Sierra Nevada, California, 38%, 42%, and 20% of bark-beetle-caused tree mortality occurred during the first, second, and third years following prescribed fire, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Mechanical treatment, with or without prescribed fire, produced significant reductions of 16-32 Mg of carbon per ha during the first posttreatment year.
“Mechanical treatment, with or without prescribed fire, produced significant reductions of 16-32 Mg of carbon per ha during the first posttreatment year, but this was partially balanced by an enhanced net uptake of about 12 Mg of carbon per ha during the subsequent 1-3 years (Boerner et al. 2008b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Four individual FFS Study sites exhibited significant carbon losses to prescribed fire.
“although four individual sites did exhibit significant carbon losses to prescribed fire.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The reduction was partially balanced by an enhanced net uptake of about 12 Mg of carbon per ha during the subsequent 1-3 years.
“but this was partially balanced by an enhanced net uptake of about 12 Mg of carbon per ha during the subsequent 1-3 years (Boerner et al. 2008b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
In the longer term, thinning has been shown to reduce stand susceptibility to bark beetle attack in many seasonally dry forests.
“In the longer term, thinning has been shown to reduce stand susceptibility to bark beetle attack in many seasonally dry forests (Fettig et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2007 source
- Findingreasoning
In most studies, short-term increases have been reported in bark-beetle-caused tree mortality.
“In most studies, short-term increases have been reported in bark-beetlecaused tree mortality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Breece and colleagues (2008) reported that 80% of all bark-beetle-attacked trees were colonized during the first year following the application of prescribed fire.
“However, Breece and colleagues (2008) reported that 80% of all bark-beetleattacked trees were colonized during the first year following the application of prescribed fire.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Breece et al. 2008 source
- Findingcitation
Neither FFS Study-network scale nor individual-site total soil carbon was affected significantly by any of the manipulative treatments in either sampling year.
“Similarly, neither FFS Study-network scale nor individualsite total soil carbon was affected significantly by any of the manipulative treatments in either sampling year (Boerner et al. 2008a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Research illustrates that these fuel treatments do not create conditions suitable for all species.
“Research illustrates that these fuel treatments do not create conditions suitable for all species (see the negative responses in figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites figure 3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
Western US coniferous forests responded differently to the FFS Study treatments than did eastern US deciduous, coniferous, and mixed forests in carbon storage and uptake.
“In terms of carbon storage and uptake, western US coniferous forests responded differently to the FFS Study treatments than did eastern US deciduous, coniferous, and mixed forests, which suggests that the optimal management for fire, harvesting, and carbon sequestration differs between these regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Fuel-reduction treatments that include prescribed fire, alone or in combination with mechanical treatments, generally result in short-term losses of forest-floor organic layers, resulting in greater mineral soil exposure.
“Fuel-reduction treatments that include prescribed fire, alone or in combination with mechanical treatments, generally result in short-term losses of forest-floor organic layers, resulting in greater mineral soil exposure (figure 2; Boerner et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
- Findingown data
At the FFS Study-network scale, total ecosystem carbon was not significantly affected by prescribed fire.
“At the FFS Study-network scale, total ecosystem carbon was not significantly affected by prescribed fire, although four individual sites did exhibit significant carbon losses to prescribed fire.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Additional analyses demonstrate that low-to moderate-severity surface fire (and presumably its thinning surrogate) does not mimic the early successional habitat conditions created by high-intensity, patchy, stand-replacing fires.
“Additional analyses demonstrate that low-to moderate-severity surface fire (and presumably its thinning surrogate) does not mimic the early successional habitat conditions created by high-intensity, patchy, standreplacing fires.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
There were no significant network-scale effects of the manipulative treatments on either extractable calcium or extractable potassium.
“Within-and among-site variability in extractable base cation content was even more variable than was soil pH, with the result that there were no significant network-scale effects of the manipulative treatments on either extractable calcium or extractable potassium (Boerner et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
- Findingcitation
Fettig and McKelvey (2010) reported large increases in bark-beetle-caused tree mortality on unburned split plots relative to adjacent burned split plots 3-5 years after the application of prescribed fire at Black Mountain Experimental Forest, California.
“For example, Fettig and McKelvey (2010) reported large increases in bark-beetlecaused tree mortality on unburned split plots relative to adjacent burned split plots 3-5 years after the application of prescribed fire at Black Mountain Experimental Forest, California.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig and McKelvey 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Changes in dead-wood carbon and soil organic carbon stocks were highly variable.
“although changes in these two carbon stocks were highly variable (Boerner et al. 2008b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Much of the volume to be removed may be in the boles of trees with a 15-20-cm diameter at breast height or larger.
“Although fuel reduction is focused primarily on small trees and down woody materials, which are expensive to collect or treat, much of the volume to be removed may be in the boles of trees with a 15-20-cm diameter at breast height or larger.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Treatment rates beyond 2% of the landscape per year, based on optimized treatment placement, yielded little added benefit.
“Their findings indicated that treatment rates beyond 2% of the landscape per year, based on optimized treatment placement, yielded little added benefit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Finney et al. 2007 source
- Findingnone given
Initial changes in mineral soil exposure, pH, and exchangeable cations tend to disappear after only a few years.
“initial changes tend to disappear after only a few years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Prior to FFS Study treatments, total carbon storage across the network averaged 185 Mg C/ha.
“Prior to the application of the FFS Study treatments, the total carbon storage across the network averaged 185 megagrams (Mg) of carbon per ha”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Mineral soil exposure, pH, and exchangeable cations respond to treatment in the short term.
“Although mineral soil exposure, pH, and exchangeable cations respond to treatment in the short term, initial changes tend to disappear after only a few years.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Western US forest sites averaged 171 Mg C/ha.
“the western US forest sites averaged 171 Mg of carbon per ha”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Increases in understory species richness are especially in fire-adapted plants and plants favored by more xeric forest-floor conditions.
“especially that of fire-adapted plants and those plants that are favored by more xeric forestfloor conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwilk et al. 2009 source
- Findingcitation
Overall understory species richness increases with treatment disturbance.
“overall understory species richness also increases (Schwilk et al. 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwilk et al. 2009 source
- Findingcitation
Eastern sites averaged 196 Mg C/ha.
“and the eastern sites averaged 196 Mg of carbon per ha (Boerner et al. 2008b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Other soil variables, including bulk density, soil carbon, dead-wood carbon, and soil nitrogen, exhibit extremely subtle responses to treatment.
“Other soil variables, including bulk density, soil carbon, dead-wood carbon, and soil nitrogen exhibit extremely subtle responses to treatment (Boerner et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
- Findingcitation
Numbers of exotic plants tend to increase with levels of treatment disturbance.
“Although the numbers of exotic plants tend to increase with levels of treatment disturbance, overall understory species richness also increases (Schwilk et al. 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwilk et al. 2009 source
- Findingcitation
Not all fuel treatments are being applied in high-priority forest types in the western United States.
“Current research has shown that not all fuel treatments are being applied in high-priority forest types in the western United”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schoennagel and Nelson 2010 source
- Premisecitation
Retaining larger dominant and codominant trees in the residual stands also increases a forest's resistance to fire.
“Retaining larger dominant and codominant trees in the residual stands also increases a forest's resistance to fire (Agee and Skinner 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Agee and Skinner 2005 source
- Interpretationcitation
Our analysis supports the assertion that a lack of treatment or passive management perpetuates the potential for extensive high fire severity in forests that once burned frequently with low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes.
“Our analysis supports the assertion that a lack of treatment or passive management (Stephens and Ruth 2005) perpetuates the potential for extensive high fire severity in forests that once burned frequently with low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens and Ruth 2005 source
- Premisecitation
The potential for passive crown fires (initiated by the torching of a small group of trees) is reduced most efficiently by the reduction of surface fuels followed by a reduction of ladder fuels.
“The potential for passive crown fires (initiated by the torching of a small group of trees) is reduced most efficiently by the reduction of surface fuels followed by a reduction of ladder fuels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al. 2009 source
- Premisecitation
There is increased recognition that most low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes in US forests included some patchy high-severity fire.
“There is increased recognition that most low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes in US forests included some patchy high-severity fire (Hessburg et al. 2007, Beaty and Taylor 2008, Perry et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
The effectiveness of mechanical thinning for reducing passive and active crown fire potential is largely dependent on the type of harvest system used-particularly, whether the harvest system leaves logging debris within treated stands.
“The effectiveness of mechanical thinning for reducing passive and active crown fire potential is largely dependent on the type of harvest system used-particularly, whether the harvest system leaves logging debris within treated stands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Mechanical fuel treatments alone fail to mimic fire in systems containing species with fire-cued recruitment.
“Mechanical fuel treatments alone fail to mimic fire in systems containing species with fire-cued recruitment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Reducing surface fuels by prescribed fire is a very effective treatment for reducing the potential for passive crown fires.
“Reducing surface fuels by prescribed fire is a very effective treatment for reducing the potential for passive crown fires.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al. 2009 source
- Interpretationreasoning
We expect that several fire-only treatments (two or three during a 10-20-year period) would be needed to achieve the management objective of reducing potential fire behavior and effects in the forests studied.
“We expect that several fire-only treatments (two or three during a 10-20-year period) would be needed to achieve the management objective of reducing potential fire behavior and effects in the forests studied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Conversely, thinning from above, or overstory removal of dominant and codominant trees, decreases fire resistance.
“Conversely, thinning from above, or overstory removal of dominant and codominant trees, decreases fire resistance (Stephens and Moghaddas 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens and Moghaddas 2005 source
- Interpretationnone given
Bark beetles may attack and kill trees that were injured by fire but that would otherwise have survived.
“Bark beetles may attack and kill trees that were injured by fire but that would otherwise have survived.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This similarity in the responses of birds and small mammals to thinning and low-severity prescribed fire suggests that, at the stand scale and in the short term (0-4 years), thinning may adequately mimic low-severity fire in terms of its effects on these taxa.
“This similarity in the responses of birds and small mammals to thinning and low-severity prescribed fire suggests that, at the stand scale and in the short term (0-4 years), thinning may adequately mimic low-severity fire in terms of its effects on these taxa.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Overall, the network-wide effects of the FFS Study treatments on soil properties appear to have been modest and transient.
“Overall, the network-wide effects of the FFS Study treatments on soil properties appear to have been modest and transient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many wildlife species depend on fire-maintained habitats or pyrogenic structures, such as the snags, shrubs, and bare ground created by fires of varying severity.
“Since then, a large body of work has been developed, particularly in the last 10-15 years (Kennedy and Fontaine 2009), which has shown that many wildlife species depend on fire-maintained habitats or pyrogenic structures, such as the snags, shrubs, and bare ground created by fires of varying severity (Hutto 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hutto 2008 source
- Premisecitation
Reductions in vegetation carbon from modest mechanical fuel treatments are considerably smaller than those expected from commercial harvesting.
“The reductions in carbon in vegetation produced by modest mechanical fuel treatments are considerably smaller than those that one would expect from commercial harvesting practices (North et al. 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites North et al. 2009 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Optimal management for fire, harvesting, and carbon sequestration differs between western and eastern US regions.
“which suggests that the optimal management for fire, harvesting, and carbon sequestration differs between these regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The contrast reflects the lower intensity of fires used for ecosystem restoration and fuel reduction.
“reflecting the lower intensity of fires used for ecosystem restoration and fuel reduction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Dead-wood carbon stocks will approach pretreatment magnitudes within 2 years after treatment, except in the combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatment.
“Furthermore, Boerner and colleagues' (2008b) results suggest that dead-wood carbon stocks will approach pretreatment magnitudes within 2 years after treatment, except in the combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Chipping of sub- and unmerchantable trees increased plots' risk of bark beetle attack in the short term through production of large amounts of attractive monoterpenes.
“and colleagues (2006) observed a similar effect for mechanical fuel treatments involving chipping of sub-and unmerchantable trees, whereby chipping increased the plots' risk of bark beetle attack in the short term through the production of large amounts of attractive monoterpenes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2006 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Forest-floor carbon stocks are likely to be rebuilt to pretreatment levels shortly after prescribed fire, with or without mechanical treatment.
“and therefore, forest-floor carbon stocks are likely to be rebuilt to pretreatment levels shortly after a prescribed fire, with or without mechanical treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Tree volatiles released during harvest operations and the application of prescribed fire are known to influence the physiology and behavior of bark beetles and the colonization rates of trees by bark beetles.
“Furthermore, tree volatiles released during harvest operations and the application of prescribed fire are known to influence the physiology and behavior of bark beetles and the colonization rates of trees by bark beetles (Fettig et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2006 source
- Premisecitation
The superficial Oi layer is the forest-floor carbon pool most susceptible to loss from fire.
“and is also the pool most susceptible to loss from fire (Page-Dumroese et al. 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Page-Dumroese et al. 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The forest-floor carbon pool returns rapidly to prefire conditions unless vegetative biomass is reduced for extended periods.
“Hall and colleagues' (2006) results suggest, however, that this carbon pool returns rapidly to prefire conditions unless vegetative biomass is reduced for extended periods of time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hall et al. 2006 source
- Premisecitation
The superficial Oi layer of the forest floor is among the most dynamic forest carbon pools.
“The superficial (O i ) layer of the forest floor is among the most dynamic of forest carbon pools (Yanai et al. 2003)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yanai et al. 2003 source
- Premisecitation
Results contrast with stand-replacing wildfires, in which deadwood carbon can continue to accumulate for decades.
“These results contrast strongly with those of studies of stand-replacing wildfires, in which deadwood carbon can continue to accumulate for decades (Hall et al. 2006)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hall et al. 2006 source
- Interpretationcitation
Fuel-reduction treatments may influence the amount and distribution of bark-beetle-caused tree mortality at various spatial and temporal scales.
“Fuel-reduction treatments may influence the amount and distribution of bark-beetle-caused tree mortality at various spatial and temporal scales (e.g., Fettig andMcKelvey 2010, Fettig et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fettig and McKelvey 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Fettig et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
In crown-fire systems, the lessons learned concerning vegetative responses from other forest types may be misleading.
“In these crown-fire systems, the lessons learned concerning vegetative responses from other forest types may be misleading (Schoennagel et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schoennagel et al. 2004 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Management strategies for carbon storage will differ between western and eastern US forests.
“The greater loss of forest-floor and, to a lesser extent, dead-wood carbon in western US forests, as well as their slower rate of recovery from disturbance, suggests that management strategies for carbon storage will differ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Probability of bark beetle attack on pines did not differ for early- and late-season prescribed fires.
“Schwilk and colleagues (2006) found that the probability of bark beetle attack (several species) on pines did not differ for early-and late-season prescribed fires, whereas the probability of attack on firs (Abies spp.) was greater following early-season burns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwilk et al. 2006 source
- Premisecitation
Studies of conventional mechanized treatment systems have shown that it is most efficient to handle trees and their residues as few times as possible.
“Studies of various conventional mechanized treatment systems have shown that it is most efficient to handle trees and their residues as few times as possible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Both prescribed fire and its mechanical surrogates are generally successful in meeting short-term fuel-reduction objectives.
“When they are applied, both prescribed fire and its mechanical surrogates are generally successful in meeting short-term fuel-reduction objectives”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In the longer term, chipping treatment decreased bark beetle hazard through increased growing space allocated to each residual tree by reducing stand density through thinning.
“In the longer term, however, this treatment decreased the hazard through an increase in the amount of growing space allocated to each residual tree by reducing stand density through thinning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2006 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The economics of biomass utilization are strongly influenced by the proximity of conversion facilities to the forest.
“As a result, the economics of biomass utilization are strongly influenced by the proximity of conversion facilities to the forest (Hartsough et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartsough et al. 2008 source
- Rests on an assumption: It is substantially more expensive per megajoule-kilometer to transport woody biomass by truck than to move coal, oil, or natural gas by rail, ship, or pipeline.
- Premisecitation
Whole-tree harvesting is especially less expensive when it is desirable to remove logging debris from the site.
“especially when it is desirable for fuel-reduction objectives to remove logging debris (activity fuels) from the site.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartsough et al. 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Probability of bark beetle attack on firs was greater following early-season burns.
“whereas the probability of attack on firs (Abies spp.) was greater following early-season burns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schwilk et al. 2006 source
- Interpretationreasoning
The value of these materials may more than cover the costs of their removal.
“and the value may more than cover the costs of their removal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In the longer term, thinning effects on tree vigor and microclimate reduce stand susceptibility to bark beetle attack.
“In the longer term, thinning effects (e.g., on tree vigor and microclimate) have been shown to reduce stand susceptibility to bark beetle attack (Fettig et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2007 source
- Interpretationcitation
Net financial results for similar stands may vary dramatically depending on treatment prescription and markets.
“The net financial results for similar stands may vary dramatically, depending on the treatment prescription and markets (Hartsough 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartsough 2003 source
- Interpretationnone given
Mechanical treatments can help mitigate costs and liability in some areas such as the wildland-urban-area interface.
“their application can help mitigate costs and liability in some areas, such as the wildland-urban-area interface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatment is quite effective in reducing fire hazards, especially where adjacent residential or other property does not increase the costs of fire management.
“The combined mechanical and prescribedfire treatment is quite effective in reducing fire hazards, especially where adjacent residential or other property does not increase the costs of fire management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
These materials have commercial value to sawmills and other conventional processing facilities.
“These materials have commercial value to sawmills and other conventional processing facilities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Mechanical treatments cannot serve as complete surrogates for fire.
“Although mechanical treatments cannot serve as complete surrogates for fire”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Whole-tree harvesting systems are usually less expensive than cut-to-length harvesting.
“For example, whole-tree harvesting systems are usually less expensive than cut-to-length harvesting (Hartsough et al. 1997)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartsough et al. 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
When bark beetles contribute to short-term increases in tree mortality, the results may not be entirely negative.
“Finally, when bark beetles contribute to short-term increases in the levels of tree mortality, the results of this increase may not be entirely negative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Mechanical treatments are generally more expensive than prescribed fire.
“with mechanical treatments generally being more expensive than prescribed fire (Hartsough et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartsough et al. 2008 source
- Premisenone given
Mechanical treatments are the only means of rapidly and predictably removing trees that form ladder fuels.
“Although mechanical treatments are the only means of rapidly and predictably removing trees that form ladder fuels”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
There may be fewer meaningful differences in tree mortality attributable to bark beetle attack between early- and late-season burns than previously thought.
“Although more research is needed, it appears that there may be fewer meaningful differences in the levels of tree mortality attributable to bark beetle attack observed between early-and late-season burns than was previously thought (Fettig et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Both prescribed fire and its mechanical surrogates change stand structure and fuel beds such that treated stands are more resistant and resilient to high-intensity wildfire.
“and in changing stand structure and fuel beds such that treated stands are more resistant and resilient to high-intensity wildfire.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Mechanical treatment of smaller material can produce material to be utilized in place of nonrenewable fuel sources.
“and it can produce material to be utilized in place of nonrenewable fuel sources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Costs of fuel reduction (ignoring revenues from materials removed) may range from $100 to several thousand dollars per ha.
“The costs of fuel reduction (ignoring any revenues from the materials removed) may range from $100 to several thousand dollars per ha”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartsough et al. 2008 source
- Interpretationreasoning
Implementing optimized fuel-reduction treatments in appropriate forest types will allow more of the forest to survive when it burns during wildfires.
“Implementing optimized fuel-reduction treatments in appropriate forest types will allow more of the forest to survive when it burns during wildfires.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Similar results were found in Western Australia forests and shrublands that were repeatedly burned over 30 years.
“similar results were found in Western Australia forests and shrublands that were repeatedly burned over 30 years (Wittkuhn et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wittkuhn et al. 2011 source
- Interpretationcitation
Designing more fire-resistant stands and landscapes will likely create forests that are more resistant and resilient to the changes imposed on them by climate change.
“Designing more fire-resistant stands and landscapes will likely create forests that are more resistant and resilient to the changes imposed on them by climate change.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Other ecosystems adapted to different fire regimes would probably exhibit different responses to fuel treatments.
“other ecosystems adapted to different fire regimes would probably exhibit different responses to fuel treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 40
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWhen responses of the same species were compared between mechanical thinning and low-severity fire, 42% of the birds (n = 31) and 54% of the small mammals (n = 13) showed no change in response.
“When responses of the same species were compared between mechanical thinning and low-severity fire (reported in Fontaine and Kennedy 2012), 42% of the birds (n = 31) and 54% of the small mammals (n = 13) showed no change in response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Fontaine and Kennedy 2012 source
The ‘Fire surrogates and low/moderate-severity prescribed fire’ section reports that species often responded similarly to thinning and low/moderate-severity fire. Table 3 gives 47% with no difference among 45 species pooled across taxa, not the claimed separate figures of 42% of 31 birds and 54% of 13 small mammals. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAssociated costs including loss of forest products, other values and resources, and personal property may total several thousand dollars per ha for large fires.
“In addition, associated costs, including the loss of forest products, other values and resources, and personal property, may total several thousand dollars per ha for large fires (e.g., Lynch 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Lynch 2004 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe US Department of Energy and the US Department of Agriculture estimate that over 50 million oven-dry metric tons of smaller material could be recovered in fuel treatments across the United States for biomass energy.
“The US Department of Energy and the US Department of Agriculture estimate that over 50 million oven-dry metric tons of smaller material could be recovered in fuel treatments across the United States for biomass energy (Perlack et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Perlack et al. 2005 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCosts of wildfire suppression in the United States from 1994 to 2004 averaged over $400 per ha burned.
“The costs of wildfire suppression in the United States from 1994 to 2004 averaged over $400 per ha burned (Perlack et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Perlack et al. 2005 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBurning in the spring results in the fewest significant changes to stand and fuel structures, and spring burning results in greater retention of large woody debris, which could be desirable in some cases, including the retention of microhabitat features required by many wildlife species.
“Burning in the spring results in the fewest significant changes to stand and fuel structures, and spring burning results in greater retention of large woody debris, which could be desirable in some cases, including the retention of microhabitat features required by many wildlife species (Knapp et al. 2009, Fettig et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Knapp et al. 2009 source
- cites Fettig et al. 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationBoth prescribed-fire and mechanical fuel treatments can increase the abundance of exotic species, and this increase is generally greatest with combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatments.
“Both prescribed-fire and mechanical fuel treatments can increase the abundance of exotic species, and this increase is generally greatest with combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatments (e.g., Bartuszevige andKennedy 2009, Schwilk et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bartuszevige and Kennedy 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schwilk et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHowever, the rates of tree mortality are generally low (less than 5% of trees) and are concentrated in smaller-diameter trees for most bark beetle species.
“However, the rates of tree mortality are generally low (less than 5% of trees) and are concentrated in smaller-diameter trees for most bark beetle species (figure 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites figure 4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe amount of carbon stored in vegetation was not significantly affected by prescribed fire but decreased by about 30 Mg per ha as the result of mechanical or combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatment.
“The amount of carbon stored in vegetation was not significantly affected by prescribed fire but decreased by about 30 Mg per ha as the result of mechanical or combined mechanical and prescribed-fire treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe soils underlying the 12-site FFS Study network were very diverse and included six soil orders and more than 50 named soil series.
“The soils underlying the 12-site FFS Study network were very diverse and included six soil orders and more than 50 named soil series.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAt the network scale, soil pH was significantly higher in soils of the combined mechanical and fire treatment than in untreated control soils during the first posttreatment year but not during the later sampling year.
“Despite this variability, at the network scale, soil pH was significantly higher in soils of the combined mechanical and fire treatment than in untreated control soils during the first posttreatment year but not during the later sampling year (figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCombined mechanical thinning and low-severity fire led to an increased positive response in birds (47%) but a decrease in small mammals (28%).
“Combined mechanical thinning and low-severity fire led to an increased positive response in birds (47%) but a decrease in small mammals (28%; figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites figure 3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNeither dead-wood carbon nor soil organic carbon was significantly affected by the FFS Study treatments.
“Neither dead-wood carbon nor soil organic carbon was significantly affected by the FFS Study treatments, although changes in these two carbon stocks were highly variable (Boerner et al. 2008b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAlthough considerable mineral soil exposure may be observed in skid trails and other areas of intensive vehicle activity during mechanical treatments, such treatments typically had an impact on less than 2% of the forest floor, and therefore had little effect on soil exposure.
“Although considerable mineral soil exposure may be observed in skid trails and other areas of intensive vehicle activity during mechanical treatments, such treatments typically had an impact on less than 2% of the forest floor, and therefore had little effect on soil exposure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither prescribed fire alone nor the mechanical treatment alone had a significant effect on soil pH at the FFS Study-network scale during either sampling year.
“Neither prescribed fire alone nor the mechanical treatment alone had a significant effect on soil pH at the FFS Study-network scale during either sampling year (figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the FFS Study-network scale, total inorganic nitrogen increased significantly during the first posttreatment year after all manipulative treatments, but this effect did not persist to the later sampling year.
“At the FFS Study-network scale, total inorganic nitrogen increased significantly during the first posttreatment year after all manipulative treatments, but this effect did not persist to the later sampling year (figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSoil bulk density (as a measure of soil compaction) was not affected significantly by any of the fuel-reduction treatments at the FFS Study-network scale, a result that is consistent with other studies.
“Soil bulk density (as a measure of soil compaction) was not affected significantly by any of the fuel-reduction treatments at the FFS Study-network scale, a result that is consistent with other studies (e.g., Moehring et al. 1966).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Moehring et al. 1966
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe amount of forest-floor carbon storage was reduced by about 1-7 Mg per ha by fire or combined mechanical and fire treatment but was unaffected by mechanical treatment alone.
“In contrast, the amount of forest-floor carbon storage was reduced by about 1-7 Mg per ha by fire or combined mechanical and fire treatment but was unaffected by mechanical treatment alone (Boerner et al. 2008b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThirty percent to 36% of the birds responded positively to low-severity fire and mechanical thinning, with smaller negative responses of 21% and 18%, respectively.
“Thirty percent to 36% of the birds responded positively to low-severity fire and mechanical thinning, with smaller negative responses of 21% and 18%, respectively (figure 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites figure 3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSoil organic carbon content was not significantly affected by any of the treatments during the first posttreatment year and was only marginally reduced by prescribed fire alone during the later sampling year.
“Soil organic carbon content was not significantly affected by any of the treatments during the first posttreatment year and was only marginally reduced by prescribed fire alone during the later sampling year (figure 2; Boerner et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn the FFS Study, product values exceeded total costs of treatment by averages of nearly $3000 per ha on some western sites but were less than the costs in other locations.
“In the FFS Study, for example, product values exceeded the total costs of treatment by averages of nearly $3000 per ha on some western sites but were less than the costs in other locations (Hartsough et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartsough et al. 2008 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThis figure includes both the maintenance of previously treated units and the installation of new treatments.
“This figure includes both the maintenance of previously treated units and the installation of new treatments”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Finney et al. 2007 source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenOverall responses by bark beetles tend to be relatively short lived and concentrated in the smaller-diameter classes.
“the overall responses by bark beetles tend to be relatively short lived and concentrated in the smaller-diameter classes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationOf this total, 45% was in vegetation, 38% in soil organic matter, 10% in the forest floor, and 7% in dead wood.
“of which 45% was in vegetation, 38% in soil organic matter, 10% in the forest floor, and 7% in dead wood”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boerner et al. 2008b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSurveys along the perimeter of chipped plots revealed large numbers of recently attacked trees in untreated areas that did not benefit from thinning but suffered risk similar to high monoterpenes beneath the forest canopy.
“Surveys along the perimeter of chipped plots revealed large numbers of recently attacked trees in untreated areas that did not benefit from the positive effects of thinning but that suffered a level of risk similar to that associated with high levels of monoterpenes beneath the forest canopy (Fettig et al. 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fettig et al. 2006 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenBark beetles often take advantage of fire-damaged trees, particularly in the western United States.
“Although bark beetles often take advantage of fire-damaged trees-particularly in the western United States”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConversely, late-growing-season or dormant-season prescribed fires are likely to be of greater intensity and to entail greater fuel consumption and have been reported by some authors to result in greater amounts of tree mortality than early-season prescribed fires.
“Conversely, late-growing-season or dormant-season prescribed fires are likely to be of greater intensity and to entail greater fuel consumption and have been reported by some authors to result in greater amounts of tree mortality than early-season prescribed fires (e.g., Thies et al. 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Thies et al. 2005 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBoth prescribed fire and its mechanical surrogates are generally successful in meeting short-term fuel-reduction objectives such that treated stands are more resilient to high-intensity wildfire.
“Both prescribed fire and its mechanical surrogates are generally successful in meeting short-term fuel-reduction objectives such that treated stands are more resilient to high-intensity wildfire.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCurrent conditions of many seasonally dry forests in the western and southern United States, especially those that once experienced low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes, leave them uncharacteristically susceptible to high-severity wildfire.
“The current conditions of many seasonally dry forests in the western and southern United States, especially those that once experienced low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes, leave them uncharacteristically susceptible to high-severity wildfire.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe potential for active crown fires (fire spreading in crown and surface fuels simultaneously) is reduced most effectively by a combination of mechanical and prescribed-fire treatments, because these treatments can target ladder and surface fuels and intermediate-size trees.
“The potential for active crown fires (fire spreading in crown and surface fuels simultaneously) is reduced most effectively by a combination of mechanical and prescribed-fire treatments, because these treatments can target ladder and surface fuels and intermediate-size trees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al. 2009 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMechanical treatments may disturb or add to organic material on the forest floor and may lack the heat required to kill fire-sensitive tree and shrub species or to cue seed germination in some fire-dependent species.
“Such treatments may disturb or add to organic material on the forest floor and may lack the heat required to kill fire-sensitive tree and shrub species or to cue seed germination in some fire-dependent species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMechanical fuel treatments can be successful surrogates for fire in modifying forest structure but are variable in their effects on understory plant communities because of large differences among treatments and the variation in understory vegetation composition and productivity among forest types.
“Mechanical fuel treatments can be successful surrogates for fire in modifying forest structure but are variable in their effects on understory plant communities because of large differences among treatments and the variation in understory vegetation composition and productivity among forest types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLow-to moderate-intensity fires reduced the quantity and continuity of fuels and discouraged the establishment of fire-intolerant species.
“Low-to moderateintensity fires reduced the quantity and continuity of fuels and discouraged the establishment of fire-intolerant species (Agee and Skinner 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Agee and Skinner 2005 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMost available evidence suggests that these objectives are typically accomplished with few unintended consequences, since most ecosystem components (vegetation, soils, wildlife, bark beetles, carbon sequestration) exhibit very subtle effects or no measurable effects at all.
“Most available evidence suggests that these objectives are typically accomplished with few unintended consequences, since most ecosystem components (vegetation, soils, wildlife, bark beetles, carbon sequestration) exhibit very subtle effects or no measurable effects at all.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEarly-growing-season burns occur at the beginning of the annual growth period, when plants are most susceptible to heat damage and when carbohydrate reserves are at their lowest levels.
“Early-growing-season burns occur at the beginning of the annual growth period, when plants are most susceptible to heat damage and when carbohydrate reserves are at their lowest levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFire suppression, the preferential harvest of large-diameter trees, and land conversion over the past 150 years have changed fuel conditions over millions of hectares of forests such that recent wildfires have tended to be larger and more severe, and this trend may continue in some forests as climates continue to warm.
“Yet fire suppression, the preferential harvest of large-diameter trees, and land conversion over the past 150 years have changed fuel conditions over millions of hectares (ha) of forests (Stephens and Ruth 2005) such that recent wildfires have tended to be larger and more severe, and this trend may continue in some forests as climates continue to warm (McKenzie et al. 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDesired treatment effects on fire hazards are transient, which indicates that after fuel-reduction management starts, managers need to be persistent with repeated treatment, especially in the faster-growing forests in the southern United States.
“Desired treatment effects on fire hazards are transient, which indicates that after fuel-reduction management starts, managers need to be persistent with repeated treatment, especially in the faster-growing forests in the southern United States.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrescribed fire alone can greatly increase the wind speed needed to initiate a passive crown fire, which effectively reduces stand vulnerability to torching and the transition to active crown fire.
“However, prescribed fire alone can greatly increase the wind speed needed to initiate a passive crown fire, which effectively reduces stand vulnerability to torching and the transition to active crown fire (Stephens et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al. 2009 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough mechanical treatments do not serve as complete surrogates for fire, their application can help mitigate costs and liability in some areas.
“Although mechanical treatments do not serve as complete surrogates for fire, their application can help mitigate costs and liability in some areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhole-tree-removal systems are one of the most effective mechanical systems and may be preferred where wood-chip or biomass markets are available.
“In this regard, whole-tree-removal systems are one of the most effective mechanical systems and may be preferred where wood-chip or biomass markets are available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis material, killed by the fire, will eventually fall to the ground and can exacerbate fire effects when the site burns again.
“This material, killed by the fire, will eventually fall to the ground and can exacerbate fire effects when the site burns again.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningGiven the scale of the FFS Study and the results from previous research, we expect similar minimal effects on soils properties when areas are treated with fire or mechanical fuel treatments in forests that historically experienced frequent, low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes.
“Given the scale of the FFS Study and the results from previous research, we expect similar minimal effects on soils properties when areas are treated with fire or mechanical fuel treatments in forests that historically experienced frequent, low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 12-site FFS Study network and other cited studies are representative of seasonally dry forests in the western and southern United States that historically experienced low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe literature indicates that the FFS Study is the most comprehensive study conducted on the effects of fuels treatments on soils, and we therefore rely most heavily on that study in this synthesis.
“The literature indicates that the FFS Study is the most comprehensive study conducted on the effects of fuels treatments on soils, and we therefore rely most heavily on that study in this synthesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningTherefore, the results suggest that the use of thinning in lieu of prescribed fire may be warranted for birds and small mammals, particularly in areas in which the implementation of prescribed fire is problematic.
“Therefore, the results suggest that the use of thinning in lieu of prescribed fire may be warranted for birds and small mammals, particularly in areas in which the implementation of prescribed fire is problematic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenBark beetles are recognized as important tree-mortality agents in the coniferous forests of the southern and western United States.
“Bark beetles are recognized as important tree-mortality agents in the coniferous forests of the southern and western United States.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMechanical treatment of smaller material cannot escape to cause damage to neighboring property.
“Mechanical treatment of smaller material has two obvious advantages over prescribed fire: It cannot escape to cause damage to neighboring property”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHeath et al. (2003) estimated total carbon in US forested ecosystems averaged approximately 203 Mg C/ha.
“In contrast, Heath and colleagues (2003) estimated that the total amount of carbon in US forested ecosystems averaged approximately 203 Mg of carbon per ha”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heath et al. 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKey factors affecting treatment costs include amount and type of material to be treated, terrain and weather conditions, and size of treatment unit and its proximity to residential or other developments.
“The key factors affecting treatment costs include the amount and type of material to be treated, terrain and weather conditions, and the size of the treatment unit and its proximity to residential or other developments (Fight and Barbour 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fight and Barbour 2005
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrescribed fire is an effective and relatively inexpensive way of reducing surface fuels and ladder fuels.
“prescribed fire is an effective and relatively inexpensive way of reducing surface fuels and ladder fuels (Agee and Skinner 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Agee and Skinner 2005 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationSome managers may need additional information on local fire regimes to help prioritize restoration activities.
“which suggests that some managers may need additional information on local fire regimes to help prioritize restoration activities (Schoennagel and Nelson 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schoennagel and Nelson 2010 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationMost available evidence suggests that fuel-reduction objectives are typically accomplished with few unintended consequences because most ecosystem components exhibit very subtle effects or no measurable effects at all.
“Most available evidence suggests that fuel-reduction objectives are typically accomplished with few unintended consequences, because most ecosystem components (vegetation, soils, wildlife, bark beetles, carbon sequestration) exhibit very subtle effects or no measurable effects at all”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wittkuhn et al. 2011 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe results presented in this article are for forests that once burned frequently with low- to moderate-intensity fire regimes.
“The results presented in this article are for forests that once burned frequently with low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBoth maintenance of previously treated units and installation of new treatments are critical for a successful strategy.
“both of which are critical for a successful strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The 12-site FFS Study network and other cited studies are representative of seasonally dry forests in the western and southern United States that historically experienced low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes.
“Given the scale of the FFS Study and the results from previous research, we expect similar minimal effects on soils properties when areas are treated with fire or mechanical fuel treatments in forests that historically experienced frequent, low-to moderate-intensity fire regimes.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The seasonality of fire interacts with vegetative species' phenologies.
“It is reasonable to assume that the seasonality of fire might interact with vegetative species' phenologies, but experimental results have been mixed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The historical fire season is a meaningful baseline for assessing the risks of prescribed fire.
“One of the primary concerns with prescribed fire as a management tool is its application outside of the historical fire season (Knapp et al. 2009).”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is substantially more expensive per megajoule-kilometer to transport woody biomass by truck than to move coal, oil, or natural gas by rail, ship, or pipeline.
“It is substantially more expensive (per megajoule-kilometer) to transport woody biomass by truck than it is to move coal, oil, or natural gas by rail, ship, or pipeline.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Well-recognized tools and tactics are available for increasing the resilience of fire-frequent forests to disturbances.
“Well-recognized tools and tactics are available for increasing the resilience of FF forests to disturbances (Stephens et al. 2012, Collins et al. 2014).”
From Drought, Tree Mortality, and Wildfire in Forests Adapted to Frequent Fire (2018) · cites this paper as Stephens et al. 2012
Cites
Perlack, R. D. (2005) · doi:10.2172/885984 · Cited by 2,087 · see citing works
CLIMATE CHANGE AND FORESTS OF THE FUTURE: MANAGING IN THE FACE OF UNCERTAINTY
Millar, C. I., Stephenson, N. L., & Stephens, S. L. (2007) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/06-1715.1 · Cited by 2,009 · see citing works
Self-citationBasic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments
Agee, J. K., & Skinner, C. N. (2005) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.034 · Cited by 1,397 · see citing works
Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: meta analysis
Johnson, D. W., & Curtis, P. S. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00282-6 · Cited by 1,353 · see citing works
US Department of Energy (USDOE), W., Perlack, R., USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), O. O. S. T. B. T. O. (., Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), O. R., USDA, Wright, L., Turhollow, A., Graham, R., Stokes, B., & Erbach, D. (2005) · doi:10.2172/1216415 · Cited by 1,327 · see citing works
The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests
SCHOENNAGEL, T., VEBLEN, T. T., & ROMME, W. H. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0661:tioffa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 776 · see citing works
Miller, J. D., Safford, H. D., Crimmins, M., & Thode, A. E. (2009) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9201-9 · Cited by 747 · see citing works
Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation
McKENZIE, D., GEDALOF, Z., PETERSON, D. L., & MOTE, P. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00492.x · Cited by 666 · see citing works
FEDERAL FOREST‐FIRE POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES
Stephens, S. L., & Ruth, L. W. (2005) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/04-0545 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Self-citationFettig, C. J., Klepzig, K. D., Billings, R. F., Munson, A. S., Nebeker, T. E., Negrón, J. F., & Nowak, J. T. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.011 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Self-citationStephens, S. L., Moghaddas, J. J., Edminster, C., Fiedler, C. E., Haase, S., Harrington, M., Keeley, J. E., Knapp, E. E., McIver, J. D., Metlen, K., et al. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1755.1 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Fire Regime and Habitat on Tree Dynamics in North Florida Longleaf Pine Savannas
Glitzenstein, J. S., Platt, W., & Streng, D. R. (1995) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2963498 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Soil carbon dynamics after forest harvest: An ecosystem paradigm reconsidered
Yanai, R. D., Currie, W. S., & Goodale, C. L. (2003) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-002-0206-5 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
The ecology of mixed severity fire regimes in Washington, Oregon, and northern California
Perry, D. A., Hessburg, P. F., Skinner, C. N., Spies, T. A., Stephens, S. L., Taylor, A. H., Franklin, J. F., McComb, B., & Riegel, G. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.004 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Self-citationInteractions Among Wildland Fires in a Long-Established Sierra Nevada Natural Fire Area
Collins, B. M., Miller, J. D., Thode, A. E., Kelly, M., van Wagtendonk, J. W., & Stephens, S. L. (2008) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9211-7 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwilk, D. W., Keeley, J. E., Knapp, E. E., McIver, J., Bailey, J. D., Fettig, C. J., Fiedler, C. E., Harrod, R. J., Moghaddas, J. J., Outcalt, K. W., et al. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1747.1 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Self-citationEcological effects of prescribed fire season: a literature review and synthesis for managers
Knapp, E. E., Estes, B. L., & Skinner, C. N. (2009) · doi:10.2737/psw-gtr-224 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires
Finney, M. A., Seli, R. C., McHugh, C. W., Ager, A. A., Bahro, B., & Agee, J. K. (2007) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf06064 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Effects of Wildfire on Soils and Watershed Processes
Ice, G. G., Neary, D. G., & Adams, P. W. (2004) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/102.6.16 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Prescribed-fire effects on fine-root and tree mortality in old-growth ponderosa pine
Swezy, D. M., & Agee, J. K. (1991) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x91-086 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Brose, P. H., & Lear, D. H. V. (1998) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x97-218 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Collins, B. M., Everett, R. G., & Stephens, S. L. (2011) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es11-00026.1 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Self-citationSoil mineral nitrogen changes following prescribed burning in ponderosa pine
Covington, W. W., & Sackett, S. S. (1992) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/0378-1127(92)90011-w · Cited by 236 · see citing works
The ecological importance of severe wildfires: Some like it hot
Hutto, R. L. (2008) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-0895.1 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Fontaine, J. B., & Kennedy, P. L. (2012) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/12-0009.1 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citationHessburg, P. F., Salter, R. B., & James, K. M. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9098-2 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Beaty, R. M., & Taylor, A. H. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.044 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Impacts of fire and fire surrogate treatments on forest soil properties: A meta-analytical approach
Boerner, R. E. J., Huang, J., & Hart, S. C. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/07-1767.1 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationRitchie, M. W., Skinner, C. N., & Hamilton, T. A. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.044 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
League, K., & Veblen, T. T. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.030 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed‐conifer carbon stocks and emissions
North, M., Hurteau, M., & Innes, J. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-1173.1 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Collins, B. M., & Stephens, S. L. (2010) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9470-5 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Self-citationFontaine, J. B., Donato, D., Robinson, W. D., Law, B., & Kauffman, J. (2009) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.030 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationToward reference conditions: wildfire effects on flora in an old-growth ponderosa pine forest
Laughlin, D. C., Bakker, J. D., Stoddard, M. T., Daniels, M. L., Springer, J. D., Gildar, C. N., Green, A. M., & Covington, W. W. (2004) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.034 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Effects of an Intense Prescribed Forest Fire: Is It Ecological Restoration?
Fulé, P. Z., Cocke, A. E., Heinlein, T. A., & Covington, W. W. (2004) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1061-2971.2004.00283.x · Cited by 123 · see citing works
A meta-analysis of bird responses to uniform partial harvesting across North America
VANDERWEL, M. C., MALCOLM, J. R., & MILLS, S. C. (2007) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00756.x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Fire Management of California Shrubland Landscapes
Keeley, J. E. (2002) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-001-0034-y · Cited by 118 · see citing works
EIVAZI, F., & Bayan, M. R. (1996) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x26-204 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Schwilk, D. W., Knapp, E. E., Ferrenberg, S. M., Keeley, J. E., & Caprio, A. C. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.036 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Self-citationHartsough, B. R., Abrams, S., Barbour, R. J., Drews, E. S., McIver, J. D., Moghaddas, J. J., Schwilk, D. W., & Stephens, S. L. (2008) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2008.02.001 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationBreece, C. R., Kolb, T. E., Dickson, B. G., McMillin, J. D., & Clancy, K. M. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.08.026 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Stephens, S. L., & Moghaddas, J. J. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.007 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationPopulation viability analysis and fire return intervals for an endemic Florida scrub mint
Menges, E. S., Ascencio, P. F. Q., Weekley, C. W., et al. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.002 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
The Potential of U.S. forest soils to sequester carbon and mitigate the greenhouse effect
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-5236 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Potential fire behavior is reduced following forest restoration treatments
Fulé, P. Z., McHugh, C. W., Heinlein, T. A., et al. (2001) · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Soil Nitrogen Changes Associated with Slash Pile Burning in Pinyon-Juniper Woodlands
Covington, W. W., DeBano, L. F., & Huntsberger, T. G. (1991) · Forest Science · doi:10.1093/forestscience/37.1.347 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Effects of fire on spotted owl site occupancy in a late-successional forest
Roberts, S. L., van Wagtendonk, J. W., Miles, A. K., & Kelt, D. A. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.002 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Schoennagel, T., & Nelson, C. R. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/090199 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Boerner, R. E. J., Huang, J., & Hart, S. C. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.021 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationFettig, C. J., McMillin, J. D., Anhold, J. A., Hamud, S. M., Borys, R. R., Dabney, C. P., & Seybold, S. J. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.018 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationLitter and dead wood dynamics in ponderosa pine forests along a 160-year chronosequence
Hall, S. A., Burke, I. C., & Hobbs, N. T. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2344:ladwdi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Season of prescribed burn in ponderosa pine forests in eastern Oregon: Impact on pine mortality
Thies, W. G., Westlind, D. J., & Loewen, M. (2005) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf04051 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Economics of harvesting to maintain high structural diversity and resulting damage to residual trees
Hartsough, B. (2003) · Western Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.1093/wjaf/18.2.133 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationCarbon Trends in U.S. Forestlands: A Context for the Role of Soils in Forest Carbon Sequestration
Heath, L. S., Smith, J. E., & Birdsey, R. A. (2002) · The Potential of U.S. FOREST SOILS to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect · doi:10.1201/9781420032277-3 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Fettig, C. J., McKelvey, S. R., Cluck, D. R., Smith, S. L., & Otrosina, W. J. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.019 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationWittkuhn, R. S., McCaw, L., Wills, A. J., Robinson, R., Andersen, A. N., Van Heurck, P., Farr, J., Liddelow, G., & Cranfield, R. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.10.037 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Gopher tortoise response to habitat management by prescribed burning
YAGER, L. Y., HEISE, C. D., EPPERSON, D. M., & HINDERLITER, M. G. (2007) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/2006-337 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
What do forest fires really cost?
Lynch, D. L. (2004) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.1093/jof/102.6.42 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Brose, P. H., & Lear, D. H. V. (1998) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-28-3-331 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Perchemlides, K. A., Muir, P. S., & Hosten, P. E. (2008) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.2111/07-026r1.1 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
(2009) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation(1966) · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Manual felling time and productivity in southern pine forests
Lortz, D., Kluender, R. A., McCoy, W. D., Stokes, B. J., & Klepac, J. F. (1997) · Forest Products Journal · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Fettig, C. J., & McKelvey, S. R. (2010) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0602026 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationSmall Parcel Fuel Reduction with a Low-Investment, High-Mobility Operation
DeLasaux, M. J., Hartsough, B. R., Spinelli, R., et al. (2009) · Western Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.1093/wjaf/24.4.205 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationBoerner, R. E. J., Huang, J., & Hart, S. C. (2008) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x08-144 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationFire and Fire-Suppression Impacts on Forest-Soil Carbon
Page-Dumroese, D., Jurgensen, M. F., & Harvey, A. E. (2002) · The Potential of U.S. FOREST SOILS to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect · doi:10.1201/9781420032277-13 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Financial analysis of fuel treatments.
Fight, Roger, D., & Barbour, R. J. (2023) · doi:10.2737/pnw-gtr-662 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
(2009) · Lincoln (University of Nebraska) · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationRoise, J. P., Hannum, L. C., & Catts, G. P. (2009) · doi:10.13031/2013.28860 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hartsough, 1997, Comparison of mechanized systems for thinning ponderosa pine and mixed conifer stands, Forest Products Journal, 47, 59
- Stoddard, 1931, The Bobwhite Quail: Its Habits, Preservation, and Increase
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning to coexist with wildfire
Moritz, M. A., Batllori, E., Bradstock, R. A., Gill, A. M., Handmer, J., Hessburg, P. F., Leonard, J., McCaffrey, S., Odion, D. C., Schoennagel, T., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13946 · Cited by 1,169 · see citing works
Managing forests and fire in changing climates
Stephens, S. L., Agee, J. K., Fulé, P. Z., North, M. P., Romme, W. H., Swetnam, T. W., & Turner, M. G. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240294 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Self-citationObserved and anticipated impacts of drought on forest insects and diseases in the United States
Kolb, T. E., Fettig, C. J., Ayres, M. P., Bentz, B. J., Hicke, J. A., Mathiasen, R., Stewart, J. E., & Weed, A. S. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.051 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
“…scientific support that proactive thinning in dense conifer forests of the western and southeastern U.S. reduces the severity of future bark beetle infestations (Fettig et al., 2007, 2014b; Nowak et al., 2015) and wildfires (Stephens et al., 2012; McIver et al., 2013) (but see Six et al., 2014).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDrought, Tree Mortality, and Wildfire in Forests Adapted to Frequent Fire
Stephens, S. L., Collins, B. M., Fettig, C. J., Finney, M. A., Hoffman, C. M., Knapp, E. E., North, M. P., Safford, H., & Wayman, R. B. (2018) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/bix146 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Self-citationTemperate and boreal forest mega‐fires: characteristics and challenges
Stephens, S. L., Burrows, N., Buyantuev, A., Gray, R. W., Keane, R. E., Kubian, R., Liu, S., Seijo, F., Shu, L., Tolhurst, K. G., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/120332 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
“…the incorporation of larger scale (10 000–30 000 ha) management processes – including prescribed burning programs, strategic mechanical fuel treatments, combinations of strategic mechanical and fire treatments, or by allowing wildfires to burn under certain conditions (Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe fire frequency‐severity relationship and the legacy of fire suppression in California forests
Steel, Z. L., Safford, H. D., & Viers, J. H. (2015) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es14-00224.1 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
“…continue to warm and science shows that fuel reduction has strong positive effects on forest resilience to severe wildfire and the environmental effects of fuel treatments in mixed conifer forests are mostly neutral to beneficial (Safford et al. 2012, Stephens et al. 2012, Martinson and Omi 2013).”
BackgroundAdapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions
Prichard, S. J., Hessburg, P. F., Hagmann, R. K., Povak, N. A., Dobrowski, S. Z., Hurteau, M. D., Kane, V. R., Keane, R. E., Kobziar, L. N., Kolden, C. A., et al. (2021) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2433 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
“treatment followed by regular maintenance burning (Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialTree mortality following drought in the central and southern Sierra Nevada, California, U.S.
Fettig, C. J., Mortenson, L. A., Bulaon, B. M., & Foulk, P. B. (2018) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.006 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Self-citationAdams, M. A. (2013) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.039 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Kalies, E. L., & Kent, L. L. Y. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.021 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
The worldwide “wildfire” problem
Gill, A. M., Stephens, S. L., & Cary, G. J. (2012) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/10-2213.1 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Self-citationFire and tree death: understanding and improving modeling of fire-induced tree mortality
Hood, S. M., Varner, J. M., van Mantgem, P. J., & Cansler, C. A. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae934 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
“Forest structure influences fuel arrangement, local moisture, and fire-atmosphere interactions, thereby also influencing fire behavior that causes direct injury to trees (Agee and Skinner 2005, Stephens et al 2012).”
BackgroundJones, M. W., Kelley, D. I., Burton, C., Giuseppe, F. D., Barbosa, M. L. F., Brambleby, E., Hartley, A. J., Lombardi, A., Mataveli, G., McNorton, J., et al. (2024) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Tamm Review: Shifting global fire regimes: Lessons from reburns and research needs
Prichard, S. J., Stevens‐Rumann, C. S., & Hessburg, P. F. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.035 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
“…severity in ponderosa pine and semi-arid mixed conifer forests by reducing the intensity and often the spread of subsequent wildfires except under the most extreme fire weather conditions (Agee and Skinner, 2005; Reinhardt et al., 2008; Fulé et al., 2012; Jain et al., 2012; Stephens et al., 2012).”
BackgroundLand Management Practices Associated with House Loss in Wildfires
Gibbons, P., van Bommel, L., Gill, A. M., Cary, G. J., Driscoll, D. A., Bradstock, R. A., Knight, E., Moritz, M. A., Stephens, S. L., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029212 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationHessburg, P. F., Spies, T. A., Perry, D. A., Skinner, C. N., Taylor, A. H., Brown, P. M., Stephens, S. L., Larson, A. J., Churchill, D. J., Povak, N. A., et al. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.034 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citation<scp>U.S.</scp> federal fire and forest policy: emphasizing resilience in dry forests
Stephens, S. L., Collins, B. M., Biber, E., & Fulé, P. Z. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1584 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“…are accomplished with few November 2016 v Volume 7(11) v Article e0158410 v www.esajournals.org unintended resource impacts, as most ecosystem components (vegetation, soils, song birds, small mammals, bark beetles) exhibit very subtle changes or no measurable effects at all (Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFontaine, J. B., & Kennedy, P. L. (2012) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/12-0009.1 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“Understanding the consequences of combined fire and fire surrogate treatments is of high management interest, given the greater effectiveness of thinning followed by prescribed fire in reducing hazard vs. thinning or prescribed fire alone (Stephens et al. 2009; Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRecent Tree Mortality in the Western United States from Bark Beetles and Forest Fires
Hicke, J. A., Meddens, A. J. H., & Kolden, C. A. (2015) · Forest Science · doi:10.5849/forsci.15-086 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
“Changes include extensive forest thinning, reintroduction of fire through prescription, and reduced suppression of wildfires in remote areas to restore ecological processes (Stephens and Ruth 2005, Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundZald, H. S. J., & Dunn, C. J. (2018) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1710 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
“…mechanical thinning and prescribed burning have been the dominant land management response for mitigating these conditions (Agee and Skinner 2005, Stephens et al. 2012), although there is an increasing recognition of the need to manage wildfires more holistically to meet social and ecological…”
BackgroundClimate change, fire management, and ecological services in the southwestern US
Hurteau, M. D., Bradford, J. B., Fulé, P. Z., Taylor, A. H., & Martin, K. L. (2013) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.007 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“indicates that forest thinning coupled with prescribed burning is the most effective means of reducing high-severity fire risk (Fulé et al., 2012; Safford et al., 2009; Stephens et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInteractions among the Mountain Pine Beetle, Fires, and Fuels
Jenkins, M. J., Runyon, J. B., Fettig, C. J., Page, W. G., & Bentz, B. (2014) · Forest Science · doi:10.5849/forsci.13-017 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationOdion, D. C., Hanson, C. T., Arsenault, A., Baker, W. L., DellaSala, D. A., Hutto, R. L., Klenner, W., Moritz, M. A., Sherriff, R. L., Veblen, T. T., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087852 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“, [6– 9,11,13,15,17,28]), that fire exclusion has greatly increased the prevalence of severe fire in ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests.”
BackgroundDavis, K. T., Peeler, J. L., Fargione, J., Haugo, R. D., Metlen, K. L., Robles, M. D., & Woolley, T. J. (2024) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.121885 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“1; Prichard et al., 2010; Stephens et al., 2012).”
ResultClimate change impacts on fire regimes and key ecosystem services in Rocky Mountain forests
Rocca, M. E., Brown, P. M., MacDonald, L. H., & Carrico, C. M. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.005 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Barriers and enablers for prescribed burns for wildfire management in California
Miller, R. K., Field, C. B., & Mach, K. J. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0451-7 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Resistance and Resilience: A Conceptual Framework for Silviculture
DeRose, R. J., & Long, J. N. (2014) · Forest Science · doi:10.5849/forsci.13-507 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Abrupt, climate-induced increase in wildfires in British Columbia since the mid-2000s
Parisien, M., Barber, Q. E., Bourbonnais, M., Daniels, L. D., Flannigan, M., Gray, R. W., Hoffman, K. M., Jain, P., Stephens, S. L., Taylor, S. W., et al. (2023) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00977-1 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationNorth, M. P., Brough, A., Long, J. W., Collins, B. M., Bowden, P., Yasuda, D. A., Miller, J. D., & Sugihara, N. G. (2014) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.5849/jof.14-058 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
“113(❚):000–000 http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-058 moderate severity frequent fire regimes can be achieved with treatments that include fire (North et al. 2009, Fule et al. 2012, Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialEffects of Climate Change on Invasive Species
Finch, D. M., Butler, J., Runyon, J. B., Fettig, C. J., Kilkenny, F. F., Jose, S., Frankel, S. J., Cushman, S. A., Cobb, R. C., Dukes, J. S., et al. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45367-1_4 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Self-citationFuel treatments and landform modify landscape patterns of burn severity in an extreme fire event
Prichard, S. J., & Kennedy, M. C. (2013) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/13-0343.1 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“In contrast, treatments may need to be repeated frequently (2–10 years) in more productive ecosystems with flammable shrub and/or understory tree layers that could be released by thinning and prescribed burn treatments (Finney et al. 2005, Battaglia et al. 2008, Stephens et al. 2012a).”
BackgroundPrichard, S. J., Povak, N. A., Kennedy, M. C., & Peterson, D. W. (2020) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2104 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments and Air Quality (FIREX‐AQ)
Warneke, C., Schwarz, J. P., Dibb, J. E., Калашникова, О. В., Frost, G. J., Al‐Saad, J., Brown, S. S. S., Brewer, W. A., Soja, A. J., Seidel, F. C., et al. (2022) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2022jd037758 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Hood, S. M., Baker, S., & Sala, A. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1363 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“Many studies have reported the effects of fuel treatments in reducing potential high-severity fire (reviewed in Fulé et al. 2012, Stephens et al. 2012 b ), and the effects of forest management on bark beetle attack patterns also have been widely studied (reviewed in Fettig et al. 2007, 2014 b ).”
BackgroundEvaluating alternative fuel treatment strategies to reduce wildfire losses in a Mediterranean area
Salis, M., Laconi, M., Ager, A. A., Alcasena, F., Arca, B., Lozano, O. M., de Oliveira, A. F., & Spano, D. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.03.009 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
García-Llamas, P., Suárez‐Seoane, S., Taboada, Á., Fernández–Manso, A., Quintano, C., Fernández‐García, V., Fernández‐Guisuraga, J. M., Marcos, E., & Calvo, L. (2018) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.10.051 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Ryan, K. C., & Opperman, T. S. (2013) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.003 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
“The recent increase in the scope and complexity of wildland fire management is attributable to three factors: recent climate trends, the influx of homes and infrastructure into wildlands, and land management practices that have contributed to the increasing mass and continuity of hazardous fuels (Keane et al., 2002a;…”
BackgroundMcIver, J. D., Stephens, S. L., Agee, J. K., Barbour, J., Boerner, R. E. J., Edminster, C. B., Erickson, K. L., Farris, K. L., Fettig, C. J., Fiedler, C. E., et al. (2012) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf11130 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationChanging climates, changing forests: A western North American perspective
Fettig, C. J., Reid, M. L., Bentz, B. J., Sevanto, S., Spittlehouse, D. L., & Wang, T. (2013) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.5849/jof.12-085 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationMishra, M., Guria, R., Baraj, B., Nanda, A. P., Santos, C. A. G., da Silva, R. M., & Laksono, F. A. T. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171713 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Fire behavior in masticated fuels: A review
Kreye, J. K., Brewer, N. W., Morgan, P., Varner, J. M., Smith, A. M. S., Hoffman, C. M., & Ottmar, R. D. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.035 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
“, in press), an observation also made in western sites (Reiner et al., 2009; Knapp et al., 2011; Stephens et al., 2012).”
BackgroundFuel treatment longevity in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest
Stephens, S. L., Collins, B. M., & Roller, G. B. (2012) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.030 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationManagement Strategies for Bark Beetles in Conifer Forests
Fettig, C. J., & Hilszczański, J. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417156-5.00014-9 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationMiller, J. D., Collins, B. M., Lutz, J. A., Stephens, S. L., van Wagtendonk, J. W., & Yasuda, D. A. (2012) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1890/es12-00158.1 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“Retention of forests with conditions indicative of a late successional stage of forest development is desirable to maintain wildlife habitat, biological diversity, carbon sequestration, and other ecosystem values (Binkley et al. 2007, Luyssaert et al. 2008, Stephens et al. 2012a).”
BackgroundSelf-citationFifty years of wildland fire science in Canada
Coogan, S. C. P., Daniels, L. D., Boychuk, D., Burton, P. J., Flannigan, M., Gauthier, S., Kafka, V. G., Park, J. S., & Wotton, B. M. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2020-0314 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Tague, C., Moritz, M. A., & Hanan, E. J. (2019) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1350 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
“While there have been many studies of simulated fuels treatment effects using fire behavior models (see reviews Fulé et al., 2012; Stephens et al., 2012), which produce estimates of fire behavior and indices of crown fire potential, these studies do not typically link effects to ecosystem processes…”
BackgroundInfluential“Forest fire emissions: A contribution to global climate change”
Singh, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2022.925480 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“Trees do not disappear completely even during high-intensity fires, but their resilience capacity is significantly affected (Stephens et al., 2012).”
BackgroundManaging Sierra Nevada forests
North, M. P. (2012) · doi:10.2737/psw-gtr-237 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Effects of fire on pollinators and pollination
BROWN, J. M., York, A., Christie, F. J., & Mccarthy, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12670 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“Fire regimes can be manipulated by fire suppression and applying prescribed fire (e.g. Keeley et al. 2011), though the ability to control wildfire is expected to decrease as fire intensity increases across much of the globe under climate change (Stephens et al. 2012; Flannigan et al. 2013).”
BackgroundFulé, P. Z., Swetnam, T. W., Brown, P. M., Falk, D. A., Peterson, D. L., Allen, C. D., Aplet, G. H., Battaglia, M. A., Binkley, D., Farris, C. A., et al. (2013) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12136 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationTubbesing, C. L., Fry, D. L., Roller, G. B., Collins, B. M., Fedorova, V. A., Stephens, S. L., & Battles, J. J. (2019) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.010 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationKelley, D. I., Burton, C., Giuseppe, F. D., Jones, M. W., Barbosa, M. L. F., Brambleby, E., McNorton, J., Liu, Z., Bradley, A. S. I., Blackford, K. R., et al. (2025) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
How climate change and fire exclusion drive wildfire regimes at actionable scales
Hanan, E. J., Ren, J., Tague, C., Kolden, C. A., Abatzoglou, J. T., Bart, R. R., Kennedy, M. C., Liu, M., & Adam, J. C. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abd78e · Cited by 79 · see citing works
California Spotted Owl, Songbird, and Small Mammal Responses to Landscape Fuel Treatments
Stephens, S. L., Bigelow, S. W., Burnett, R. D., Collins, B. M., Gallagher, C. V., Keane, J. J., Kelt, D. A., North, M. P., Roberts, L. J., Stine, P. A., et al. (2014) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biu137 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citationStevens, J. T., Safford, H. D., & Latimer, A. M. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2013-0460 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Most current research on the effects of fuel treatments on forest resilience involves comparisons of different treatment types and untreated stands in the absence of any wildfire (Schwilk et al. 2009; Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundWildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California’s Sierra Nevada
Ma, Q., Bales, R. C., Rungee, J., Conklin, M. H., Collins, B. M., & Goulden, M. L. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125364 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“North, M., B. M. Collins & S. Stephens, 2012.”
Mockrin, M. H., Fishler, H. K., & Stewart, S. I. (2018) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-018-1030-9 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Waltz, A. E. M., Stoddard, M. T., Kalies, E. L., Springer, J. D., Huffman, D. W., & Meador, A. J. S. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.026 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Bernes, C., Jonsson, B. G., Junninen, K., Lõhmus, A., Macdonald, S. E., Müller, J. C., & Sandström, J. (2015) · Environmental Evidence · doi:10.1186/s13750-015-0050-7 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“[23]).”
The cost of climate change: Ecosystem services and wildland fires
Lee, C., Schlemme, C. E., Murray, J., & Unsworth, R. E. (2015) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.020 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
The effects of thinning and burning on understory vegetation in North America: A meta-analysis
Willms, J. O., Bartuszevige, A. M., Schwilk, D. W., & Kennedy, P. L. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.03.010 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationAger, A. A., Evers, C., Day, M. A., Alcasena, F., & Houtman, R. M. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104212 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Treatment in these situations is driven by risk reduction, rather than achieving a reference condition within the historic range of variability (Stephens et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMorillo, N. T. J., Almendros, G., Arranz, J. M. D. L. R., Jordán, A., Zavala, L. M., Granged, A. J. P., & González‐Pérez, J. A. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138715 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Halofsky, J. S., Donato, D. C., Franklin, J., Halofsky, J., Peterson, D., & Harvey, B. J. (2018) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2140 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“…1 have been articulated for many forests ranging from wet coniferous forests to sub-alpine ecosystems (Bessie and Johnson 1995, Turner et al. 2003, Schoennagel et al. 2004, Keane et al. 2008, Mitchell et al. 2009, Stephens et al. 2012, Timpane-Padgham et al. 2017), but we expand on it here.”
Bat Response to Differing Fire Severity in Mixed-Conifer Forest California, USA
Buchalski, M. R., Fontaine, J. B., Heady, P. A., Hayes, J. P., & Frick, W. F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057884 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationStephens, S. L., Foster, D. E., Battles, J. J., Bernal, A. A., Collins, B. M., Hedges, R. F., Moghaddas, J. J., Roughton, A. T., & York, R. A. (2023) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2932 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
“Managers in the western US have implemented forest restoration and fuel treatments with research done simultaneously to study their ecological impacts (Covington et al., 1997; North et al., 2007; Stephens et al., 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDiversity in forest management to reduce wildfire losses: implications for resilience
Charnley, S., Spies, T. A., Barros, A. M. G., White, E. M., & Olsen, K. A. (2017) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-08753-220122 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“Of this set, surface fuels, which are not typically reduced by timber harvest, are considered the most hazardous in many forests (Stephens et al. 2012, Calkin et al. 2014, North et al. 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialFordyce, A., Hradsky, B. A., Ritchie, E. G., & Stefano, J. D. (2015) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyv159 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Fry, D. L., Stephens, S. L., Collins, B. M., North, M. P., Franco-Vizcaíno, E., & Gill, S. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088985 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“Restoring ecosystems through prescribed fire and fuel reduction treatments has been effective at reducing fire behavior of wildfires, decreasing tree mortality, and providing defensible space for communities and opportunities for suppression operations [97], [102–105].”
BackgroundSelf-citationAddington, R. N., Hudson, S. J., Hiers, J. K., Hurteau, M. D., Hutcherson, T. F., Matusick, G., & Parker, J. M. (2015) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf14187 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“…the world in recent decades, raising public concern and highlighting the need for cohesive strategies aimed at fuels management, community protection, landscape restoration and public education (USDA Forest Service 2000; Westerling et al. 2006; Butry et al. 2010; Stephens et al. 2012; McCaw 2013).”
BackgroundImpact of Stand and Landscape Management on Forest Pest Damage
Marini, L., Ayres, M. P., & Jactel, H. (2021) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-062321-065511 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Wildfire impacts on California spotted owl nesting habitat in the Sierra Nevada
Stephens, S. L., Miller, J. D., Collins, B. M., North, M. P., Keane, J. J., & Roberts, S. L. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1478 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“…small mammals, songbirds, etc.), because most ecosystem components exhibit very subtle or no measurable change relative to untreated areas (Stephens et al. 2012). however, given the many economic, administrative, and social constraints on landscape fuel treatment projects (Collins et al.…”
BackgroundSelf-citationEdge effects in fire‐prone landscapes: Ecological importance and implications for fauna
Parkins, K. A., York, A., & Stefano, J. D. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4076 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“In response to this, prescribed fire is increasingly being used as a management tool globally (Fernandes et al., 2013; Penman et al., 2011; Stephens et al., 2012).”
Are plant community responses to wildfire contingent upon historical disturbance regimes?
Miller, J. E. D., & Safford, H. D. (2020) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13115 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“…on fire behaviour than contemporary forest thinning and fuel treatment management, which leave the larger trees, explicitly reduce surface fuels and cull small, fire-intolerant trees, thus tending to reduce fire severity (Safford, Stevens, Merriam, Meyer, & Latimer, 2012; Stephens et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInteractions of climate, fire, and management in future forests of the Pacific Northwest
Wimberly, M. C., & Liu, Z. (2013) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.043 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Forest Fire Severity Patterns of Resource Objective Wildfires in the Southern Sierra Nevada
Meyer, M. D. (2014) · Journal of Forestry · doi:10.5849/jof.14-084 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Drivers of California’s changing wildfires: a state-of-the-knowledge synthesis
MacDonald, G. M. S. D., Wall, T., Enquist, C. A. F., LeRoy, S. R., Bradford, J. B., Breshears, D. D., Brown, T. J., Cayan, D. R., Dong, C., Falk, D. A., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf22155 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Sequential application of these tools is a typical approach, particularly if the management goal is to reduce surface fuels rather than redistribute them (Stephens et al. 2012).”
Beyond reducing fire hazard: Fuel treatment impacts on overstory tree survival
Collins, B. M., Das, A. J., Battles, J. J., Fry, D. L., Krasnow, K. D., & Stephens, S. L. (2014) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/14-0971.1 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“The tradeoff associated with the mechanical-only treatment is that it was initially only moderately effective at reducing hazardous fire potential (Stephens and Moghaddas 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe Effect of Repeated Prescribed Burning on Soil Properties: A Review
Fontúrbel, T., Carrera, N., Vega, J. A., & Fernández, C. (2021) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f12060767 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“The broad scale of the treatments carried out in the US for ecological restoration of past fire regimes and the frequent use of combined treatments in that approach are providing relevant information on this point [52,158,159].”
BackgroundSitters, H., Stefano, J. D., Christie, F. J., Swan, M. H., & York, A. (2015) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/14-1562 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Moriarty, K. M., Epps, C. W., Betts, M. G., Hance, D. J., Bailey, J. D., & Zielinski, W. J. (2015) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0216-2 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“Keywords Connectivity Forest management Fuel reduction Functional connectivity Landscape fragmentation Martes americana Martes caurina Marten Movement Titration experiment”
Using Unplanned Fires to Help Suppressing Future Large Fires in Mediterranean Forests
Regos, A., Aquilué, N., Retana, J., Cáceres, M. D., & Brotons, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094906 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Other issues have been recognized as key, such as the management of fuel to reduce fire intensity and the extent and impact of large fires, but they pose difficulties in terms of effective implementation at large spatial scales [14,15,16,17].”
BackgroundFire and Insect Interactions in North American Forests
Fettig, C. J., Runyon, J. B., Homicz, C. S., James, P. M. A., & Ulyshen, M. D. (2022) · Current Forestry Reports · doi:10.1007/s40725-022-00170-1 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationLoehman, R. A., Keane, R. E., & Holsinger, L. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2020.00003 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“strategies to ameliorate undesired wildfire impacts in many ecological systems (Stephens et al., 2012; Svenning and Sandel, 2013; Schoennagel et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSitters, H., Christie, F. J., Stefano, J. D., Swan, M. H., Penman, T. D., Collins, P. C., & York, A. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.01.009 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Archetypes of community wildfire exposure from national forests of the western US
Evers, C., Ager, A. A., Nielsen‐Pincus, M., Palaiologou, P., & Bunzel, K. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.004 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“examined received fires from areas of the national forest where mechanical thinning, slash removal, and prescribed fires are suited to reduce wildfire size and severity (Stephens et al., 2012) and improve the capacity of managers to contain or suppress fires when needed.”
BackgroundExpansion of US wood pellet industry points to positive trends but the need for continued monitoring
Aguilar, F. X., Mirzaee, A., McGarvey, R. G., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75403-z · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Prichard, S. J., Kennedy, M. C., Wright, C. S., Cronan, J. B., & Ottmar, R. D. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.025 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Restoring surface fire stabilizes forest carbon under extreme fire weather in the Sierra Nevada
Krofcheck, D., Hurteau, M. D., Scheller, R. M., & Loudermilk, E. L. (2017) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1663 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Thompson, M. P., Freeborn, P. H., Rieck, J. D., Calkin, D. E., Gilbertson-Day, J. W., Cochrane, M. A., & Hand, M. S. (2016) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf14216 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“…of hazardous fuel loads can similarly influence localised and landscape scale fire behaviour, particularly in areas treated with prescribed fire (Finney et al. 2007; Moghaddas Journal compilation IAWF 2016 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ijwf et al. 2010; Syphard et al. 2011a; Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundDaniels, L. D., Dickson‐Hoyle, S., Baron, J. N., Copes‐Gerbitz, K., Flannigan, M., Castellanos‐Acuña, D., Hoffman, K. M., Bourbonnais, M., WILKINSON, S., Röeser, D., et al. (2024) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2024-0092 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Tague, C., & Moritz, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Forests and Global Change · doi:10.3389/ffgc.2019.00036 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Forest thinning changes movement patterns and habitat use by Pacific marten
Moriarty, K. M., Epps, C. W., & Zielinski, W. J. (2016) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.1060 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Such treatments have been proposed or applied across North America (Agee et al. 2000, Kalies et al. 2010, Stephens et al. 2012), and result in simplified forest structure.”
BackgroundA Disrupted Historical Fire Regime in Central British Columbia
Brookes, W., Daniels, L. D., Copes‐Gerbitz, K., Baron, J. N., & Carroll, A. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.676961 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Grassland plant community spatial patterns driven by herbivory intensity
Limb, R. F., Hovick, T. J., Norland, J. E., & Volk, J. M. (2018) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.01.030 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Theory and Practice of Wildland Fuels Management
Omi, P. N. (2015) · Current Forestry Reports · doi:10.1007/s40725-015-0013-9 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Carbon loss from planned fires in southeastern Australian dry Eucalyptus forests
Volkova, L., & Weston, C. J. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.018 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Do forest fuel reduction treatments confer resistance to beetle infestation and drought mortality?
Steel, Z. L., Goodwin, M. J., Meyer, M. D., Fricker, G. A., Zald, H. S. J., Hurteau, M. D., & North, M. P. (2021) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.3344 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“While removal of smaller trees (e.g., ≤25 cm) may be less effective at mitigating drought mortality, treatments focused on ladder and surface fuels may still be preferred when considering non-drought objectives such as reducing fire hazard or maintaining wildlife habitat (Stephens et al. 2012).”
BackgroundSollmann, R., White, A. M., Gardner, B., & Manley, P. (2015) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2015.03.002 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“Compared o more mesic forests, studies of small mammals in high-frequency re forests are few and have been largely restricted to the more omogeneous forests of the interior US (Stephens et al., 2012, 014).”
Simulating post‐wildfire forest trajectories under alternative climate and management scenarios
Tarancón, A. A., Fulé, P. Z., Shive, K. L., Sieg, C. H., Meador, A. J. S., & Strom, B. A. (2014) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/13-1787.1 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“…surface- fire regimes, such as ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), management interventions aimed at reducing fuels and restoring the functional properties of surface fire regimes have been demonstrated to reduce wildfire severity (Fulé et al. 2012, Safford et al. 2012, Stephens et al. 2012).”
Background
- Authors
- Stephens, S. L., McIver, J. D., Boerner, R. E. J., Fettig, C. J., Fontaine, J. B., Hartsough, B. R., Kennedy, P. L., & Schwilk, D. W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- BioScience
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 549-560
- ISSN
- 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3244
- OpenAlex
- W2149920440
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 20.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BioScience (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
- Keywords
- fuel reduction treatments, prescribed burning, mechanical fuel treatment, wildfire risk, high-severity fire, fire regimes, fire hazard management, ecosystem impacts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review