Cited by 74Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest ecology and management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alternative characterization of forest fire regimes: incorporating spatial patterns

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10980-017-0528-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Together, these datasets have revealed much greater heterogeneity in fire effects than previously characterized.

    “Together, these datasets have revealed much greater heterogeneity in fire effects than previously characterized (Cansler & McKenzie, 2012;Collins et al., 2017).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Collins et al., 2017

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Agee JK (1993) Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Island Press, Washington DC
  2. Agee JK (1998) The landscape ecology of Western forest fire regimes. Northwest Sci 72:24–34
  3. Brown PM, Wienk CL, Symstad AJ (2008) Fire and forest history at Mount Rushmore. Ecol Appl 18:1984–1999 · DOI
  4. Cansler CA, McKenzie D (2014) Climate, fire size, and biophysical setting control fire severity and spatial pattern in the northern Cascade Range, USA. Ecol Appl 24:1037–1056 · DOI
  5. Chambers ME, Fornwalt PJ, Malone SL, Battaglia MA (2016) Patterns of conifer regeneration following high severity wildfire in ponderosa pine—dominated forests of the Colorado Front Range. For Ecol Manag 378:57–67 · DOI
  6. Clark JS, Silman M, Kern R, Macklin E, HilleRisLambers J (1999) Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology 80:1475–1494 · DOI
  7. Collins BM, Stephens SL (2010) Stand-replacing patches within a ‘mixed severity’ fire regime: quantitative characterization using recent fires in a long-established natural fire area. Landscape Ecol 25:927–939 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Collins BM, Roller GB (2013) Early forest dynamics in stand-replacing fire patches in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Landscape Ecol 28:1801–1813 · DOI
  9. Fulé PZ, Covington WW, Moore MM (1997) Determining reference conditions for ecosystem management of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecol Appl 7:895–908 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Harvey BJ, Donato DC, Turner MG (2016) Drivers and trends in landscape patterns of stand-replacing fire in forests of the US Northern Rocky Mountains (1984–2010). Landscape Ecol 31(10):2367–2383 · DOI
  11. Hessburg PF, Spies TA, Perry DA, Skinner CN, Taylor AH, Brown PM, Stephens SL, Larson AJ, Churchill DJ, Povak NA, Singleton PH, McComb B, Zielinski WJ, Collins BM, Salter RB, Keane JJ, Franklin JF, Riegel G (2016) Tamm review: management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California. For Ecol Manag 366:221–250 · DOI
  12. Kemp KB, Higuera PE, Morgan P (2016) Fire legacies impact conifer regeneration across environmental gradients in the U.S. northern Rockies. Landscape Ecol 31:619–636 · DOI
  13. Lydersen JM, Collins BM, Miller JD, Fry DL, Stephens SL (2016) Relating fire-caused change in forest structure to remotely sensed estimates of fire severity. Fire Ecol 12:99–116 · DOI
  14. McDonald PM (1980) Seed dissemination in small clearcuttings in north-central California. General Technical Report PSW-150. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, CA, USA, p 5 · DOI
  15. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS v3: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst
  16. Miller JD, Quayle B (2015) Calibration and validation of immediate post-fire satellite derived data to three severity metrics. Fire Ecol 11:12–30 · DOI
  17. Miller JD, Thode AE (2007) Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sens Environ 109:66–80 · DOI
  18. Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE (2009) Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12:16–32 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Miller JD, Collins BM, Lutz JA, Stephens SL, van Wagtendonk JW, Yasuda DA (2012) Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA. Ecosphere 3:80 · DOI
  20. Odion DC, Hanson CT, Arsenault A, Baker WL, DellaSala DA, Hutto RL, Klenner W, Moritz MA, Sherriff RL, Veblen TT, Williams MA (2014) Examining historical and current mixed-severity fire regimes in ponderosa pine and mixed-conifer forests of western North America. PLoS ONE 9:e87852 · DOI
  21. Perry DA, Hessburg PF, Skinner CN, Spies TA, Stephens SL, Taylor AH, Franklin JF, McComb B, Riegel G (2011) The ecology of mixed severity fire regimes in Washington, Oregon, and Northern California. For Ecol Manag 262:703–717 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Schoennagel T, Veblen TT, Romme WH (2004) The interaction of fire, fuels, and climate across Rocky Mountain forests. Bioscience 54:661–676 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Stevens JT, Safford HD, Harrison S, Latimer AM (2015) Forest disturbance accelerates thermophilization of understory plant communities. J Ecology 103:1253–1263 · DOI
  24. Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, Crisafulli CM, Dellasala DA, Hutto RL, Lindenmayer DB, Swanson FJ (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ 9:117–125 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Swetnam TW, Allen CD, Betancourt JL (1999) Applied historical ecology: using the past to manage for the future. Ecol Appl 9:1189–1206 · DOI
  26. Taylor AH (2004) Identifying forest reference conditions on early cut-over lands, Lake Tahoe Basin, USA. Ecol Appl 14:1903–1920 · DOI
  27. Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, Hargrove WW (1997) Effects of fire size and pattern on early succession in Yellowstone National Park. Ecol Monogr 67:411–433 · DOI
  28. van Wagtendonk JW (2006) Fire as a physical process. In: Sugihara NG, van Wagtendonk JW, Shaffer KE, Fites-Kaufman JA, Thode AE (eds) Fire in California’s ecosystems. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 38–57 · DOI
  29. Wu J, Shen W, Sun W, Tueller PT (2002) Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecol 17:761–782 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Collins, B. M., Stevens, J. T., Miller, J. D., Stephens, S. L., Brown, P. M., & North, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Collins, Brandon M.
Venue
Landscape Ecology
Published
2017-05-25
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1543-1552
ISSN
  • 0921-2973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9761
OpenAlex
W2617342008
Cited by
74
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Landscape Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station
  • College of Natural Resources, University of California Berkeley
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
forest fire regimes, stand-replacing fire, spatial patterns, post-fire vegetation dynamics, fire severity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review