The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multi-species approach for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on landscape connectivity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Albert et al. (2017) and Sahraoui et al. (2017) selected 14 and 16 eco-profiles respectively, each composed of one or more species, in order to represent a broader range of dispersal behaviours and habitat requirements.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Sahraoui et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“These studies have demonstrated that it is possible to create connectivity analyses for a large number of species, which may be ecologically more relevant.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Sahraoui et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“it has been suggested to analyse a territory's features according to the needs of a diverse number of terrestrial and aquatic species”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Sahraoui et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“These eco-profiles were designed through dimensionality reduction based on species connectivity and habitat needs, either using clustering or multivariate analysis.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Sahraoui et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“The three studies have created composite maps by summing the single-species results or by calculating the mean score for each patch of habitat.”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Sahraoui et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability
Turner, B. L., Lambin, E. F., & Reenberg, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704119104 · Cited by 2,216
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Baillie J, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (2004) 2004 IUCN red list of threatened species: a global species assessment · DOI
- Bunn AG, Urban DL, Keitt TH (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manag 59:265–278 · DOI
- Calabrese JM, Fagan WF (2004) A comparison-shopper’s guide to connectivity metrics. Front Ecol Environ 2:529–536 · DOI · Paper page
- Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RG, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. J Appl Ecol 37(5):771–788 · DOI
- Clauzel C, Bannwarth C, Foltete J-C (2015) Integrating regional-scale connectivity in habitat restoration: an application for amphibian conservation in eastern France. J Nat Conserv 23:98–107 · DOI
- Clauzel C, Girardet X, Foltête J-C (2013) Impact assessment of a high-speed railway line on species distribution: application to the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Franche-Comté. J Environ Manag 127:125–134 · DOI
- Coffin AW (2007) From roadkill to road ecology: a review of the ecological effects of roads. J Transp Geogr 15:396–406 · DOI
- Cushman SA, Landguth EL (2012) Multi-taxa population connectivity in the Northern Rocky Mountains. Ecol Modell 231:101–112 · DOI · Paper page
- Cushman SA, Landguth EL, Flather CH (2013) Evaluating population connectivity for species of conservation concern in the American Great Plains. Biodivers Conserv 22:2583–2605 · DOI · Paper page
- Dunford W, Freemark K (2005) Matrix matters: effects of Surrounding Land Uses on Forest Birds Near Ottawa, Canada. Landscape Ecol 20:497–511 · DOI
- Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142 · DOI · Paper page
- Fahrig L (1997) Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. J Wildl Manag 61:603–610 · DOI
- Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515 · DOI · Paper page
- Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309(5734):570–574 · DOI · Paper page
- Foltête J-C, Clauzel C, Vuidel G (2012) A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks. Environ Model Softw 38:316–327 · DOI
- Foltete J-C, Clauzel C, Vuidel G, Tournant P (2012) Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models. Landscape Ecol 27:557–569 · DOI
- Foltête J-C, Girardet X, Clauzel C (2014) A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land-use planning. Landsc Urban Plan 124:140–150 · DOI
- Forman RTT (1995) Land Mosaics. The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · DOI · Paper page
- Forman RTT, Alexander LE (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:207–231 · DOI · Paper page
- Fu W, Liu S, Degloria SD, Dong S, Beazley R (2010) Characterizing the “fragmentation–barrier” effect of road networks on landscape connectivity: A case study in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Landsc Urban Plann 95(3):122–129 · DOI
- Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A (2011) Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: a guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biol Conserv 144:44–55 · DOI · Paper page
- Geneletti D (2006) Some common shortcomings in the treatment of impacts of linear infrastructures on natural habitat. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:257–267 · DOI
- Giplin M, Hanski I (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: empirical and theoretical investigations. Academic Press, London
- Girardet X, Foltête J-C, Clauzel C (2013) Designing a graph-based approach to landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures. Environ Impact Assess Rev 42:10–17 · DOI
- Goetz SJ, Jantz P, Jantz CA (2009) Connectivity of core habitat in the Northeastern United States: parks and protected areas in a landscape context. Remote Sens Environ 113:1421–1429 · DOI
- Gurrutxaga M, Rubio L, Saura S (2011) Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: a transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe). Landsc Urban Plan 101:310–320 · DOI
- Hanski I, Ovaskainen O (2000) The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:755–758 · DOI
- Hirzel AH, Helfer V, Metral F (2001) Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol Modell 145:111–121 · DOI
- Hirzel AH, Le Lay G (2008) Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J Appl Ecol 45:1372–1381 · DOI
- Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856 · DOI
- Lislevand T, Figuerola J, Szekely T (2007) Avian body sizes in relation to fecundity, mating system, display behavior, and resource sharing. Ecology 88:1605 · DOI
- Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy SA, McBride M, Mengersen K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol 26(1):29–38 · DOI
- Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: general synthesis. Island Press, Washington
- Mimet A, Clauzel C, Foltête J-C (2016) Locating wildlife crossings for multispecies connectivity across linear infrastructures. Landscape Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0373-y · DOI
- Minor ES, Lookingbill TR (2010) A multiscale network analysis of protected-area connectivity for mammals in the United States. Conserv Biol 24:1549–1558 · DOI
- Nathan R (2001) The challenges of studying dispersal. Trends Ecol Evol 16:481–483 · DOI
- Opdam P, Pouwels R, Steingröver S, Vos C (2008) Setting biodiversity targets in participatory regional planning: introducing ecoprofiles. Ecol Soc 13:20 · DOI
- Paradis E, Baillie SR, Sutherland WJ (2002) Modeling large-scale dispersal distances. Ecol Model 151:279–292 · DOI
- Pereira M, Segurado P, Neves N (2011) Using spatial network structure in landscape management and planning: a case study with pond turtles. Landsc Urban Plan 100:67–76 · DOI
- Pontius RG, Shusas E, McEachern M (2004) Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agric Ecosyst Environ 101:251–268 · DOI
- Rayfield B, Fortin MJ, Fall A (2011) Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. Ecology 92:847–858 · DOI · Paper page
- Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774 · DOI · Paper page
- Sanderson EW, Redford KH, Vedder A, Coppolillo PB, Ward SE (2002) A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements. Landsc Urban Plan 58:41–56 · DOI · Paper page
- Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plan 83:91–103 · DOI
- Saura S, Vogt P, Velásquez J, Hernando A, Tejera R (2011) Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses. For Ecol Manag 262:150–160 · DOI
- Smith MA, Green DM (2005) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography 28:110–128 · DOI
- Smith FA, Lyons SK, Ernest SK, Jones KE, Kaufman DM, Dayan T, Marquet PA, Brown JH, Haskell JP (2003) Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84(12):3403 · DOI
- Solé RV, Bascompte J (2006) Self-organization in complex ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton · DOI
- Sutherland G, Harestad AS, Price K, Lertzman KP (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4(1):16 · DOI
- Tannier C, Bourgeois M, Houot H, Foltête J (2016) Land Use Policy Impact of urban developments on the functional connectivity of forested habitats: a joint contribution of advanced urban models and landscape graphs. Land Use Policy 52:76–91 · DOI
- Taylor PD, Fahrig L, With KA (2006) Landscape connectivity: a return to the basics. In: Crooks KR, Sanjayan M (eds) Connectivity conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–43 · DOI
- Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218 · DOI
- Vasas V, Magura T, Jordan F, Tothmeresz B (2009) Graph theory in action: evaluating planned highway tracks based on connectivity measures. Landscape Ecol 24:581–586 · DOI
- Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD (2007) Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecol 22:171–177 · DOI
- Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PF, Ter Braak CJ (2001) Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat 157:24–41 · DOI
- Yager R (1977) Multiple objective decision-making using fuzzy sets. Int J Man Mach Stud 9:375–382 · DOI
- Zeller KA, Mcgarigal K, Whiteley AR (2012) Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review. Landscape Ecol 27:777–797 · DOI · Paper page
- Zetterberg A, Mortberg UM, Balfors B (2010) Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Landsc Urban Plan 95:181–191 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool
Tessier, D. L., Maranger, R., & Poisot, T. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.932095 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Sahraoui, Y., Foltête, J.-C., & Clauzel, C.
- ORCID
- Sahraoui, Yohan
- Venue
- Landscape Ecology
- Published
- 2017-07-19
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1819-1835
- ISSN
- 0921-2973
- 1572-9761
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- European FEDER funds (35446)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multi-species approach for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on landscape connectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10980-017-0551-6
- The paper
- Sahraoui, Y., Foltête, J.-C., & Clauzel, C. (2017). A multi-species approach for assessing the impact of land-cover changes on landscape connectivity. Landscape Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0551-6