Cited by 20Infant Health and DevelopmentInjury Epidemiology and PreventionInfant Development and Preterm Care

A retrospective study on infant bed-sharing in a clinical practice population

Norton, Patricia J., Grellner, Karrisa W.·2011·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

In 2005 the American Academy of Pediatrics published new recommendations on infant sleep environment which advised against infants bed-sharing. A retrospective study was done to determine the prevalence of infant bed-sharing and its associations in a clinical practice. Demographic data were collected from 2,405 infants from a large family practice residency program, which included OB care, in Missouri between March 2002 and February 2008. Data were extracted from electronic medical records at the first four well-child visits: 1 month, 2-3 months, 4-5 months, and 6-8 months of age. Data analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software package, version 12.0 and 15.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, Ill). At the first, second, third, and fourth well-child visit 19, 18, 12, and 11% of infants bed-shared with an adult. Bed-sharing was associated with an infant missing one or more well-child visits (first and third visits only), breastfeeding (first and second well-child visits only), and low SES. Stratified analysis by residence showed that over the 6-year study the decrease in the rate of bed-sharing, in the urban and non-urban areas, was statistically significant (P = 0.005, 0.04, respectively). Infants born 2006-2007 had a decreased rate of bed-sharing compared to infants born 2002-2005 (0.22, 0.30, respectively, P = 0.00). In light of the high rate of bed-sharing recorded at the first well-child visit, the researchers recommend an increased emphasis on safe sleeping education during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-010-0600-0

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across segments of society, sleep practices and beliefs can vary to a great extent.

    “Across segments of society, sleep practices and beliefs can vary to a great extent.”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [109]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norton, P. J., & Grellner, K. W.
Corresponding author
Norton, Patricia J.
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2010-04-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
507-513
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2083592160
Cited by
20
References
12
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
infant sleep safety, infant sleep environment, American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, breastfeeding, socioeconomic status, urban-rural differences, well-child visits, pregnancy
MeSH terms
Beds, Family Practice, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Medical Audit, Missouri, Mother-Child Relations, Retrospective Studies, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review