CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139Adolescent and Pediatric HealthcareChild and Adolescent HealthFamily and Disability Support Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Associations of Family-Centered Care with Health Care Outcomes for Children with Special Health Care Needs

Kuo, Dennis Z., Bird, T. Mac, Tilford, J. Mick·2011·Maternal and Child Health Journal
DOI 10.1007/s10995-010-0648-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the association of family-centered care (FCC) with specific health care service outcomes for children with special health care needs (CSHCN). The study is a secondary analysis of the 2005-2006 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. Receipt of FCC was determined by five questions regarding how well health care providers addressed family concerns in the prior 12 months. We measured family burden by reports of delayed health care, unmet need, financial costs, and time devoted to care; health status, by stability of health care needs; and emergency department and outpatient service use. All statistical analyses used propensity score-based matching models to address selection bias. FCC was reported by 65.6% of respondents (N = 38,915). FCC was associated with less delayed health care (AOR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.66), fewer unmet service needs (AOR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.60), reduced odds of ≥1 h/week coordinating care (AOR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.93) and reductions in out of pocket costs (AOR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80, 0.96). FCC was associated with more stable health care needs (AOR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.21), reduced odds of emergency room visits (AOR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.99) and increased odds of doctor visits (AOR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.37). Our study demonstrates associations of positive health and family outcomes with FCC. Realizing the health care delivery benefits of FCC may require additional encounters to build key…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-010-0648-x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–101 of 101

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kuo, D. Z., Bird, T. M., & Tilford, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Kuo, Dennis Z.
ORCID
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2010-07-17
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
794-805
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
DOI
10.1007/s10995-010-0648-x
OpenAlex
W1979704291
Cited by
139
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
family-centered care, children with special health care needs, family burden, unmet service needs, out-of-pocket costs, care coordination, emergency department visits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Health Services, Child, Preschool, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Physician-Patient Relations, United States, Treatment Outcome, Children with Disabilities, Family Nursing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review