Cited by 141Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Views of Women and Clinicians on Postpartum Preparation and Recovery

Open access
Martin, Anika, Horowitz, Carol, Balbierz, Amy, Howell, Elizabeth A.·2014·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

To explore important domains of women's postpartum experiences as perceived by postpartum mothers and obstetricians/midwives, and to investigate how postpartum care could enhance patient preparation for the postpartum period. Qualitative research study was conducted to explore women's and clinicians' perceptions of the postpartum experience. Four focus groups of postpartum women (n = 45) and two focus groups of obstetric clinicians (n = 13) were held at a large urban teaching hospital in New York City. All focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using grounded theory. Four main themes were identified: lack of women's knowledge about postpartum health and lack of preparation for the postpartum experience, lack of continuity of care and absence of maternal care during the early postpartum period, disconnect between providers and postpartum mothers, and suggestions for improvement. Mothers did not expect many of the symptoms they experienced after childbirth and were disappointed with the lack of support by providers during this critical time in their recovery. Differences existed in the major postpartum concerns of mothers and clinicians. However, both mothers and clinicians agreed that preparation during the antepartum period could be beneficial for postpartum recovery. Results from this study indicate that many mothers do not feel prepared for the postpartum experience. Study findings raise the hypothesis that capturing patient-centered domains that define the postpartum experience and integrating these domains into patient care may enhance patient preparation for postpartum recovery and improve postpartum outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-013-1297-7

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women were generally satisfied and felt ready at time of discharge.

    “Women were generally satisfied and felt ready at time of discharge in contrast to retrospective reports of unmet learning needs (Martin et al., 2014; Tully et al., 2017).”

    From Scoping Review of Postpartum Discharge Education Provided by Nurses (2022) · cites this paper as Martin et al., 2014

  • Retrospective reports indicated unmet learning needs among postpartum women.

    “Women were generally satisfied and felt ready at time of discharge in contrast to retrospective reports of unmet learning needs (Martin et al., 2014; Tully et al., 2017).”

    From Scoping Review of Postpartum Discharge Education Provided by Nurses (2022) · cites this paper as Martin et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, A., Horowitz, C., Balbierz, A., & Howell, E. A.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Balbierz, Amy
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2013-06-18
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
707-713
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W1963890845
Cited by
141
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000067)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS009698, R01 HS09698-03)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R24MD001691, P60MD000270)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
postpartum recovery, postpartum care, patient preparation, obstetricians' perceptions, midwives, continuity of care, provider-patient relationship, patient-centered care, postpartum symptoms, postpartum support
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Male, New York City, Postnatal Care, Patient Satisfaction, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review