Cited by 52Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareNursing education and management

Parents' experiences of midwifery students providing continuity of care

Aune, Ingvild, Dahlberg, MSc, Unn, Ingebrigtsen, Oddbjørn·2012·Midwifery

Abstract

Objective the aim of this study was to gain knowledge and a deeper understanding of the value attached by parents to relational continuity provided by midwifery students to the woman and her partner during the childbearing process. The focus of the study was on the childbirth and the postnatal home visit. Design/setting in this pilot project by researchers at Sør-Trøndelag University College, Norway, six midwifery students provided continuity of care to 58 women throughout their pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period. One group interview of eight women and two group interviews of five men, based on the focus group technique, were conducted at the end of the project. Qualitative data were analysed through systematic text condensation. Findings the findings included two main themes: 'trusting relationship' and 'being empowered'. The sub-themes of a 'trusting relationship' were 'relational continuity' and 'presence'. For the women, relational continuity was important throughout the childbearing process, but the men valued the continuous presence during birth most highly. 'Being empowered' had two sub-themes: 'individual care' and 'coping'. For the women, individual care and coping with birth were important factors for being empowered. The fathers highlighted the individual care as necessary to feel empowered for early parenting. The home visit of the student was highly appreciated. The relationship with the midwifery student could be concluded, and they had the opportunity to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.midw.2011.06.006

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies reveal that relational continuity often helps the woman and her partner to get attention and be respected.

    “Studies reveal that relational continuity often helps the woman and her partner to get attention and be respected.”

    From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Aune et al., 2012

  • Women need help to express their emotions following the birth experience.

    “The women need help to express their emotions following the birth experience (Fenwick et al., 2010; Aune et al., 2012).”

    From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Aune et al., 2012

  • Relational continuity generates trust and predictability.

    “Relational continuity in turn generates trust and predictability (Hunter et al., 2008; Aune et al., 2012; Dahlberg and Aune, 2013; Jenkins et al., 2015).”

    From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Aune et al., 2012

  • It is important for the women that the midwife offers positive feedback about their ability to handle the birth.

    “This is often not suf fi cient as it is important for the women that the midwife offers positive feed-back about their ability to handle the birth (Löf et al., 2006; Aune et al., 2012).”

    From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Aune et al., 2012

  • The woman's partner who has been present during the birth also finds himself in a new role and needs to process his own birth experience.

    “The woman's partner who has been present during the birth also fi nds himself in a new role and needs to process his own birth experience (Aune et al., 2012; Persson et al., 2012).”

    From Women's experiences of home visits by midwives in the early postnatal period (2016) · cites this paper as Aune et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aune, I., Dahlberg, M., & Ingebrigtsen, O.
Affiliations
Høgskolen i Sør-Trøndelag (NO)
Venue
Midwifery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
432-438
ISSN
0266-6138 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084948446
Cited by
52
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Midwifery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
midwifery students, continuity of care, relational continuity, parental experiences, childbirth, postnatal home visits, trust relationships, empowerment, fathers' experiences, individualized care, early parenting, midwifery education
MeSH terms
Adult, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Midwifery, Norway, Nurse-Patient Relations, Parents, Pilot Projects, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Students, Nursing, Nursing Evaluation Research, Patient Satisfaction, Focus Groups, Trust, Delivery, Obstetric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review