Creating an MCH Pipeline for Disadvantaged Undergraduate Students
Abstract
Purpose To address minority health disparities in maternal and child health (MCH), increasing the diversity of the MCH workforce is an important strategy. Description Guided by the MCH Leadership Competencies, we developed an undergraduate pipeline program for disadvantaged students. Our target population is minority undergraduates who are interested in entering health professions but have academic challenges. We identify these students early in their undergraduate careers and expose them to the field of MCH through a 4-unit course, summer field practicum at an MCH community-based organization or agency, and volunteer experience in a student-run organization focused on helping children and families. We also provide academic advising and personal counseling by a faculty mentor and leadership training opportunities. Assessment Since 2006, 75 students have participated in our program, of which 36 are still enrolled and 39 have graduated. Among the graduates, three (8 %) have completed graduate school and are working in a health field; 11 (28 %) are enrolled in graduate school; and 13 (33 %) are currently applying to graduate school. Of the remaining graduates, seven (18 %) are employed in a health field, and five (13 %) are working in an unrelated field. Conclusion Pipeline programs should attempt to reach students as early as possible in their undergraduate careers to more effectively influence their academic trajectories. Many minority students face academic and personal challenges; therefore, intensive academic advising and one-on-one faculty mentoring are important components of pipeline programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Few program evaluations describe the impact of pipeline programs beyond short-term outcomes.
“Few program evaluations describe the impact of these programs beyond short-term outcomes.10,13,14”
From Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
A holistic approach and flexibility to recruit students who have the potential and interest to matriculate into health professions schools and who need the "intangible" supports may lead to an overall decrease in the percentage of "successful" participants, but will likely lead to an increase in medical school matriculants from disadvantaged backgrounds and enhance overall diversification of the健康
“We recognize this may lead to an overall decrease in the percentage of “successful” participants, but will likely lead to an increase in medical school matriculants from disadvantaged backgrounds and enhance overall diversification of the health care workforce in line with the social justice mission of many of these programs.12,13,16”
From Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs
Stephenson-Hunter, C., Strelnick, A. H., Rodriguez, N., Stumpf, L. A., Spano, H., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2021) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2020.0126 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kuo, A. A., Verdugo, B., Holmes, F. J., Henry, K. A., Vo, J. H., Perez, V. H., Inkelas, M., & Guerrero, A. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuo, Alice A.
- Venue
- Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Published
- 2015-06-19
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2111-2118
- ISSN
- 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6628
- OpenAlex
- W586290821
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Pirkanmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri
- University of California, Irvine
- Division of Undergraduate Education
- Maternal and Child Health Bureau
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD080461)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- pipeline programs, minority health disparities, health workforce recruitment, faculty mentoring, academic advising, student leadership training
- MeSH terms
- Maternal Health, Career Choice, Health Occupations, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Minority Groups, Pediatrics, Students, Program Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review