Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Growing a Best Babies Zone: Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Multi-Sector, Place-Based Initiative to Reduce Infant Mortality

Best Babies Zone Initiative Team, Pies, Cheri, Barr, Monica, Strouse, Carly, Kotelchuck, Milton·2016·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-016-1969-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Alexander, G. R., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges and directions for the future. Public Health Reports, 116, 306–316. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50052-3 . · DOI
  2. Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1–11. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation . · DOI
  3. Bryant, A. S., Worjoloh, A., Caughey, A., & Washington, A. E. (2010). Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: Prevalence and determinants. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(4), 335–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864 . · DOI
  4. Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 36–41. Retrieved from http://ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact .
  5. Kim, D., & Saada, A. (2013). The social determinants of infant mortality and birth outcomes in western developed nations: A cross-country systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(6), 2296–2335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10062296 . · DOI · Paper page
  6. Loggins, S., & Drumond Andrade, F. C. (2014). Despite an overall decline in U.S. infant mortality rates, the black/white disparity persists: Recent trends and future projections. Journal of Community Health, 39, 118–123. · DOI
  7. Pies, C., & Kotelchuck, M. (2014). Bringing the MCH life course perspective to life. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18, 335–338. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1408-5 . · DOI · Paper page
  8. Uribe, M., & Luginbuhl, J. (2015). Health and wealth: Building community pathways to economic vibrancy in BBZ Oakland. In: Presentation at the CityMatCH Urban MCH Leadership Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. Abstract retrieved from http://www.citymatch.org/sites/default/files/documents/EFS%202015%20Conference%20Compendium%20Final%20Draft.pdf .
  9. Vechakul, J., Shrimali, B. P., & Sandhu, J. S. (2015). Human-centered design as an approach for place-based innovation in public health: A case study from Oakland, California. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(12), 2552–2559. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1787-x . · DOI

Cited by

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Best Babies Zone Initiative Team, Pies, C., Barr, M., Strouse, C., & Kotelchuck, M.
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2016-03-24
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
968-973
ISSN
  • 1092-7875
  • 1573-6628
Cited by
21
References
1
Language
en
Funders
W.K. Kellogg Foundation (P3020008)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growing a Best Babies Zone: Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Multi-Sector, Place-Based Initiative to Reduce Infant Mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10995-016-1969-1
The paper
Best Babies Zone Initiative Team, Pies, C., Barr, M., Strouse, C., & Kotelchuck, M. (2016). Growing a Best Babies Zone: Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Multi-Sector, Place-Based Initiative to Reduce Infant Mortality. Maternal and Child Health Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1969-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.