Cited by 57Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Screening for Postpartum Depression in Well-Baby Care Settings: A Systematic Review

Open access
van der Zee-van den Berg, Angarath I., Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M., IJzerman, Maarten J., Haasnoot-Smallegange, Riet M. E., Reijneveld, Sijmen A.·2017·Maternal and Child Health Journal

Abstract

Introduction Postpartum depression (PPD) is a mental health problem frequently experienced by mothers in the first year postpartum. Early detection and treatment can help to reduce its negative effect on the development of the newborn child. Well-baby care (WBC) is a promising screening setting for early detection of PPD. This systematic review investigates the evidence of the effectiveness of screening for PPD in WBC settings regarding mother and child outcomes. Methods Three electronic databases were searched: SCOPUS, PsychINFO and CINAHL. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection. Data extraction was based on a predefined data extraction form. Results Six studies were included; a quality assessment rated two studies as strong and four as weak. Four studies measuring outcomes at process level showed improvement in detection, referral and/or treatment rates. Four studies, including the two strong ones, where screening and enhanced care were combined, showed improvements in the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores of the mothers in the intervention groups. No improvements were reported on other outcomes at parent level or at child level. At child level, weight was the only outcome that was measured. Discussion This review provides limited yet positive evidence for the value of screening for PPD in a WBC setting. The outcomes are comparable with studies on screening for PPD in general. The evidence that we found is very promising but the small number of available studies shows a need for additional high-quality studies, to strengthen the evidence regarding the potential benefits of screening in a WBC setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10995-016-2088-8

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Myers ER Aubuchon-Endsley N Bastian LA Efficacy and Safety of Screening for Postpartum Depression (Comparative Effectiveness Review 106) 2013 Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 23678510

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Zee-van den Berg, A. I., Boere-Boonekamp, M. M., IJzerman, M. J., Haasnoot-Smallegange, R. M. E., & Reijneveld, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Venue
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published
2016-08-12
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
9-20
ISSN
  • 1092-7875 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6628
OpenAlex
W2511494236
Cited by
57
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Maternal and Child Health Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (15901.0003)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, screening, well-baby care, early detection, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, infant weight
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Mass Screening, Mental Health Services, Pregnancy, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review