Cited by 56Digital Marketing and Social MediaMarketing and Advertising StrategiesConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

The unrealized value of incentivized eWOM recommendations

Kim, John, Naylor, Gillian, Sivadas, Eugene, Sugumaran, Vijayan·2016·Marketing Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11002-015-9360-3

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kim, Naylor, Sivadas, & Sugumaran (2016) studied incentivized e-WOM recommendations and concluded that manipulating reviews will have impacts on both the audience and the communicator depending on the valence of the recommendation.

    “Kim, Naylor, Sivadas, & Sugumaran (2016) have studied incentivized (inorganic) e-WOM recommendations and concluded that manipulating reviews will have impacts not only on the audience but also on the communicator (the producer of the manipulated recommendations) depending on the valence of the recommendation (positive or negative).”

    From Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions (2021) · cites this paper as Kim, Naylor, Sivadas, & Sugumaran (2016)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Naylor, G., Sivadas, E., & Sugumaran, V.
Affiliations
  • Oakland University (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, John
Venue
Marketing Letters
Published
2015-03-06
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
411-421
ISSN
  • 0923-0645 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-059X
OpenAlex
W1981707813
Cited by
56
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
15.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marketing Letters (publishedVersion)
  • University of Washington Tacoma Digital Commons (University of Washington Tacoma) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
electronic word of mouth, attitude change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review