Cited by 2,142Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective

Herr, Paul M., Kardes, Frank R., Kim, John·1991·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

The effects of word-of-mouth (WOM) communications and specific attribute information on product evaluations were investigated. A face-to-face WOM communication was more persuasive than a printed format (experiment 1). Although a strong WOM effect was found, this effect was reduced or eliminated when a prior impression of the target brand was available from memory or when extremely negative attribute information was presented (experiment 2). The results suggest that diverse, seemingly unrelated judgmental phenomena—such as the vividness effect, the perseverance effect, and the negativity effect—can be explained through the accessibility-diagnosticity model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/208570

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accessibility-diagnosticity perspective suggests that information that is more diagnostic and clearly discriminates among alternate categorizations strongly informs judgments and choice.

    “The accessibility-diagnosticity perspective also suggests that information that is more diagnostic and clearly discriminates among alternate categorizations strongly informs judgments and choice (e.g., Herr et al. 1991).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J.
Affiliations
Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
1991-03
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
454
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2099594827
Cited by
2,142
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 102 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 148 · 2014: 130 · 2013: 135 · 2012: 114
FWCI
19.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
word of mouth, persuasion, product evaluation, negativity bias, consumer judgment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review