CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Climate change impacts on agricultureClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and Sustainable Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Socio-economic impacts of climate change on rural United States.

Lal, Pankaj, Alavalapati, Janaki R. R., Mercer, Evan D.·2011·Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
DOI 10.1007/s11027-011-9295-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11027-011-9295-9

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Alavalapati JRR, Lal P (2009) Woody biomass for energy: an overview of key emerging issues. Virginia Forests 2009(3):4–8
  2. Alavalapati JRR, Lal P, Susaeta A et al (2011) Future of Southern U.S. Forests in the face of Forest Bioenergy Markets. In: Wear D, Greis, John (eds) Southern Forest for Future Report. United States Forest Service Technical Report (in press)
  3. Frumhoff PC, McCarthy JJ, Melillo JM et al (2007) Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast: science, impacts and solutions. Synthesis report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge
  4. Hanna JM (2007) Native communities and climate change: legal and policy approaches to protect Tribal legal rights. University of Colorado School of Law, Boulder, CO, Natural Resource Law Center
  5. Houser S, Teller V, MacCracken M et al (2001) Potential consequences of climate variability and change for native peoples and homelands. In: Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Report for the U.S. Global Change Research Program. U.S. National Assessment Synthesis Team. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
  6. Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change [IPCC] (2001) Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA et al (eds) Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–103
  7. Janetos A, Hansen L, Inouye D et al (2008) Biodiversity. In: Backlund P, Janetos A, Schimel D et al (eds) The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States. Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington
  8. Kiely T, Donaldson D, Grube A (2004) Pesticides industry sales and usage: 2000 and 2001 market estimates. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington
  9. Kinney PL, Shindell D, Chae E, Winston B (2001) Public health. In: Rosenzweig R, Solecki WD (eds) Climate change and a global city: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Columbia Earth Institute, New York, pp 103–120
  10. Lettenmaier D, Major D, Poff L, Running, S (2008) Water resources. In: The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States. In: Backlund P, Janetos A, Schimel D et al (eds) Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, pp. 121–150
  11. Mimura N, Nurse L, McLean RF et al (2007) Small islands. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP et al (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  12. Moser S (2005) Enhancing decision-making through integrated climate research. Summary of an exploratory workshop for the NOAA-OGP-RISA Program, Alaska Regional Meeting. Anchorage, AK February 18–19 2004. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration–Office of Global Programs. Available at: http://www.climate.noaa.gov/cpo_pa/risa/20040218_ak/report.pdf . Cited July 15, 2010
  13. Murphy B, Falkiner L, McBean G et al (2005) Enhancing local level emergency management: the influence of disaster experience and the role of household and neighbourhoods. ICLR Research Paper Series 43. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Toronto
  14. National Assessment Synthesis Team [NAST] (2001) Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. Report for the U.S. Global Change Research Program. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  15. Nilsson C (2008) Climate change from an indigenous perspective: key issues and challenges. Indigenous Aff 1–2:9–16
  16. Parson EA, Carter L, Anderson P et al (2001) Potential consequences of climate variability and change for Alaska. In: National Assessment SynthesisTeam (ed) Climate change impacts on the United States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  17. Ryan MG, Archer SR, Birdsey R et al (2008) Land resources. In: Backlund P, Janetos A, Schimel D et al (eds) The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States. Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, pp 75–120
  18. Scott D (2006a) Climate change and sustainable tourism in the 21st century. In: Cukier J (ed) Tourism research: policy, planning, and prospects—2003. Department of Geography Publication Series, University of Waterloo, Waterloo
  19. Zimmerman G, O’Bady C, Hurlbutt B (2006) Climate change: modeling a warmer Rockies and assessing the implications. The 2006 state of the Rockies report card. Colorado College, Colorado Springs, pp 89–102

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 121

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lal, P., Alavalapati, J. R. R., & Mercer, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Lal, Pankaj
ORCID
Lal, Pankaj
Venue
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-05-03
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
819-844
ISSN
  • 1381-2386 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1596
DOI
10.1007/s11027-011-9295-9
OpenAlex
W2170673330
Cited by
121
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
climate change impacts, rural communities, socioeconomic vulnerability, climate change adaptation, climate change mitigation, urban-rural differences, IPCC climate scenarios, agricultural impacts, water stress, energy costs, poverty, regional disparities, rural resilience, adaptation policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review