Cited by 1Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Elucidating the binding specificity of interactive compounds targeting ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2)

Open access
Kumar, Pawan, Kumari, Indu, Prasad, Rajendra, Ray, Shashikant, Banerjee, Atanu, Prakash, Amresh·2025·Molecular Diversity

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The ATP-binding cassette transporter superfamily plays a pivotal role in cellular detoxification and drug efflux. ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) referred to as the Breast cancer resistance protein has emerged as a key member involved in multidrug resistance displayed by cancer cells. Understanding the molecular basis of substrate and inhibitor recognition, and binding within the transmembrane domain of ABCG2 is crucial for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Herein, utilizing state-of-the-art molecular docking algorithms and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, molecular binding of substrates and inhibitors with ABCG2 are defined, distinctly. We performed extensive virtual screening of Drugbank to identify the potential candidates, and MD simulations of docked complexes were carried out in POPC lipid bilayer. Further, the binding affinities of compounds were estimated by free binding energy employing MM-GBSA. To gain deeper insight into the binding affinities and molecular characteristics contributing to inhibitory potential of certain substrates, we included some well-known inhibitors, like Imatinib, Tariquidar, and Ko 143, in our analysis. Docking results show three compounds, Docetaxel > Tariquidar > Tezacaftor having the highest binding affinities (≤ 12.00 kcal/mol) for ABCG2. Remarkably, MM-GBSA results suggest the most stable binding of Tariquidar with ABCG2 as compared to the other inhibitors. Furthermore, our results suggested that Docetaxel, Ozanimod, Pitavastatin, and Tezacaftor have the strongest affinity for the drug-binding site(s) of ABCG2. These results provide valuable insights into the key residues that may govern substrate/inhibitor recognition, shedding light on the molecular determinants influencing substrate specificity, transport kinetics, and ABCG2-mediated drug efflux.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11030-024-11078-2

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, P., Kumari, I., Prasad, R., Ray, S., Banerjee, A., & Prakash, A.
Affiliations
  • Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
  • Amity University (IN)
  • Amity University Gurugram (IN)
  • Mahatma Gandhi Central University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Banerjee, Atanu
  • Prakash, Amresh
Venue
Molecular Diversity
Published
2025-01-09
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
5635-5648
ISSN
  • 1381-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-501X
OpenAlex
W4406219493
Cited by
1
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Diversity (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
ABCG2, ABC transporters, substrate specificity, inhibitor binding, multidrug resistance, drug efflux, tariquidar, imatinib, docetaxel, tezacaftor, ozanimod, pitavastatin, binding affinity, POPC bilayer, MM-GBSA binding free energy, virtual screening
MeSH terms
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2, Binding Sites, Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Protein Binding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review