Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Potential role of lncRNA-TSIX, miR-548-a-3p, and SOGA1 mRNA in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Habieb, Alaa, Matboli, Marwa, El-Tayeb, Hanaa, El-Asmar, Farid·2019·Molecular Biology Reports

Abstract

Recent trends are moving towards the use of the circulating transcriptome as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic tool for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study is to identify circulatory RNA based biomarker panel, in addition to their relationship to the outcome in HCC. First, utilizing bioinformatics tools, we selected an HCC-specific RNA-based biomarker panel that depended on the integration of suppressor of glucose autophagy-associated (SOGA1) gene expression with the chosen panel of epigenetic regulators of this gene [long non-coding RNA antisense for X-inactive-specific transcript (lncRNA-TSIX) and microRNA-548-a-3p (miR-548-a-3p)]. Second, we attempted to validate these biomarkers using the sera of 65 patients with HCC, 34 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (CHC) infection and 32 healthy volunteers. Finally, the expression levels of the chosen RNA-based biomarker panel were assessed in the serum samples using qRT-PCR assays. The panel of 3 RNA-based biomarkers (lncRNA-TSIX, miR-548-a-3p, and SOGA1) exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating HCC patients from CHC patients and healthy controls. Among these 3 RNAs, serum lncRNA-TSIX and SOGA1 were independent prognostic factor. The chosen circulatory RNA-based biomarker panel may serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for HCC.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11033-019-04810-x

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. American Cancer Society (2018) Cancer facts & figures 2018. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
  2. Shi Y, Qiu M, Wu Y, Hai L (2015) MiR-548-a-3p-3p functions as an anti-oncogenic regulator in breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 75:111–116 · DOI
  3. Khokhar A, Noorali S, Sheraz M, Mahalingham K, Pace DG, Khanani MR, Bagasra O (2015) Computational analysis to predict functional role of hsa-miR-3065-3p as an antiviral therapeutic agent for treatment of triple infections: HCV, HIV-1, and HBV. Libyan J Med 7:19774 · DOI
  4. Weakley SM, Wang H, Yao Q et al (2011) Expression and function of a large non-coding RNA gene XIST in human cancer. World J Surg 35:1751–1756 · DOI

Cited by

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Habieb, A., Matboli, M., El-Tayeb, H., & El-Asmar, F.
Venue
Molecular Biology Reports
Published
2019-04-19
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
4581-4590
ISSN
  • 0301-4851
  • 1573-4978
Cited by
29
References
47
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Funders
Egyptian Science and Technology Development Fund (RSTDG 2259). (RSTDG 2259).)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.